Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

Inhabitants of Phillips v. Inhab- Marriage andre. 83 Me. 205...... 770

itants of Madrid

In re Meyer.....

Neg. instruments... 78 Wis. 615..... 435

Iron City Nat. Bank v. McCord..Neg. instruments...139 Pa. St. 52.... 166

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Lantz v. Vermont Life Ins. Co....Insurance...... ..139 Pa. St. 546... 202

Larsen v. Johnson...

Lehew v. Brummell..

Leonard v. Flynn..
Lilly v. Tobbein.......
Long v. Fife....

....

Maker v. Lazell.....

Marshall v. Roll

Mayo v. India Mut. Ins. Co...

..Devise.....

...Schools..

......

Ejectment..
Wills..

...

.Process.

Deeds..

78 Wis. 300..... 404 ..103 Mo. 546...... 895

....

89 Cal. 535...... 500 .103 Mo. 477.... 887 45 Kan. 271..... 724

83 Me. 562...... 795

Fraud. conveyance. 139 Pa. St. 399... 198

Marine insurance..152 Mass. 172.... 814

Mayrhofer v. Board of Education.. Mechanics' liens.... 89 Cal. 110...... 451

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Mulvane v. City of South Topeka..Mun. corporations.. 45 Kan. 45...... 706

[blocks in formation]

Phillips v. Burlington L. Co......Corporations

Pullman P. Car Co. v. Smith.....Railroads.........

[blocks in formation]

20 Or. 392.... 126

[ocr errors]

79 Tex. 543..... 363 78 Wis. 209.

400

78 Wis. 27...... 389 .141 Pa. St. 462... 304

79 Tex. 468..... 356

Putnam Nail Co. v. Dulaney.....Trade-marks......140 Pa. St. 205... 228

[blocks in formation]

Rankin v. Amazon Ins. Co.......Insurance.....
Reigelman v. Focht..............Landlord and ten't. 141 Pa. St. 380 .. 293
Renshaw v. Missouri etc. Ins. Co.. Insurance.........103 Mo. 595...... 904
...Landlord and ten't. 89 Cal. 464...... 488
Mortgage....... .152 Mass. 108.... 804

[blocks in formation]

NAME.

[blocks in formation]

455

Riegel v. American Life Ins. Co..Equity .... ......140 Pa. St. 193... 225
Richards v. Travelers Ins. Co.....Accident insurance. 89 Cal. 170......
Robinson-Rea Mfg. Co. v. Mellon. Arbitration........ .139 Pa. St. 257... 186
Roden v. Chicago and Grand
Trunk R'y Co.....

Rodenhausen v. Craven..

Railroads

.133 Ill. 72 ....... 585

[blocks in formation]

Nuisance... .......141 Pa. St. 546... 306
Negligence........140 Pa. St. 475... 250
Master and servant. 139 Pa. St. 42.... 160

.Mortgage..

Savannah etc. R'y Co. v. Harris.. Carriers..

[blocks in formation]

Schuster v. Bauman Jewelry Co... Husband and wife.. 79 Tex. 179.....
.Gaming ....

Shaffner v. Pinchback.....

.133 Ill. 410 ......

Sherrin v. St. Joseph etc. R'y Co.. Master and servant. 103 Mo. 378...

Shreffler v. Nadelhoffer.

Smith, Estate of..

....

[ocr errors]

551 327

624 881

626

..133 Ill. 536..............
45 Kan. 423..... 737

.140 Pa. St. 344... 237
83 Me. 108...... 761

Pleading

.Infants...

..Trusts

.Animals..

..........

[blocks in formation]

.134 Ill. 24.................

646

South Florida R. R. Co. v. Rhodes. Carriers....

[blocks in formation]

.Mandamus....

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Smith v. Davenport....

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

State v. Kansas Mercantile Ass'n. Lottery...

State v. Taylor......

State v. Wheeler...

45 Kan. 351..... 727

......

.Office and officer...108 N. C. 196.... 51 ..Criminal law...... 20 Or. 192... 119 45 Kan. 708..... 746 20 Or. 410...

Stewart v. Board of Comm'rs.....Injunctions....

[blocks in formation]

.Assignment...

......

132

Taylor etc. R'y Co. v. Taylor.....Master and servant. 79 Tex. 104..... 316

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

AMERICAN STATE REPORTS.

VOL. XXIII.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

[65 NEW HAMPSHIRE, 27.]

INSURANCE. - A PAID-UP POLICY IN A MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY IS NOT FORFEITED by the failure to pay interest on premium notes given on the original policy in lieu of which the paid-up policy had been issued, though the latter declares "that it shall become null and void in case interest is not paid annually in advance on any notes which may be given for any portion of the premium on this policy, and that before pay. ment will be made, any indebtedness of the company on account of this policy will first be deducted therefrom." INSURANCE POLICY SHOULD BE INTERPRETED AS THE ASSURED UNDERSTOOD Ir and the company intended he should understand it, if all parts of the contract, taken together, admit of such construction.

INSURANCE. Forfeiture of a LIFE INSURANCE POLICY FOR NON-PAYMENT OF PREMIUM when it becomes due cannot be insisted upon when the assured is entitled to share in the profits, and therefore cannot know what amount he is required to pay, and no notice has been given him of what sum the insurer claims to be due from him. INSURANCE. STIPULATIONS FOR FORFEITURE ARE STRICTLY CONSTRUED. A notice to the assured of the amount claimed to be due from him for premiums must be exact; and if it specifies a sum greater than the insurer is entitled to exact, the failure to pay does not work a forfeit

ure.

Leach and Stevens, for the plaintiff.

S. G. Lane and W. L. Foster, for the defendants.

CLARK, J. The policy in suit purports to be a paid-up policy in lieu of policy No. 39135, issued September 24, 1869. The contract set forth in the policy is, that in consideration of $480.25 paid, and of the annual payment of interest on four notes on or before the eleventh day of November in every year during the continuance of the policy, the company insure the

[blocks in formation]
« PreviousContinue »