« PreviousContinue »
ordered to maren into a mai. tu 'in the Turk I nk, and take it. It chanced that he 0420e 12 g by a co who beliers the gri Canat. ara ான் மr fams NOTIS, A conner froxa a nengnoning wage intorrer, there that troops were advancing to take the twn. They are answered. if they will take it, they must b e
came, oing in with colors flying, and firany poing their munii defiance. They looked round for an enemy, and saw the farms at tua pionghi, the blacksmith at his anvil, and the woken at their charts and spinning-wheels. Babies crosed to hear the music, and bots ran ont to see the pretty trainers, with feathers and bright buttons, the harlequins of the nintzenth century. Of course none of these were in a proper Veition to be shot at. "Where are your goldiers?' they asked. We have gone was the brief reply. But we have come to take the rwn."Well, friends, it ligg before you.'·But is there wobody here to fight?" "No, we are all Christians. Here was an emergency alugether unprovided for by the military schools. This was a sort of resistance which no bullet could hit; a fortres perfectly bomb-proof. The commander was perplexed. “If there is nobody to fight with, of course we can't fight,' said he. "It is inpussible to take such a town as this.' So he ordered the horgon heads to be turned about, and they carried the human aniInals out of the village, as guiltless as they entered, and perchance
somewhat wiser. This experiment on a small scale indicates how easy it would be to dispense with armies and navies, if men only had faith in the religion they profess to believe.”
Even paganism has exemplified, in some degree, the beauty and power of this principle. The island of Loo-Choo in the Chinese sea, was visited in 1816 by the two war-ships which took Lord Amherst to China as ambassador from England. In order to procure supplies, and make some repairs, they anchored in a harbor of the island ; and many of the natives immediately came on board, to whom the Captain, through an interpreter, stated whence the ships came, on what embassy sent, and why they had anchored there. Learning what things were wanted, they began forthwith to furnish them in great abundance, which they continued for six weeks, and then refused the slightest compensation.
Some of the crew being sick, were taken ashore to a temple as a temporary hospital, and there treated with the utmost tenderness.
Nothing,' says Capt. Hall,'could be more interesting than to observe the care which the natives took of our sick men. They crowded round to assist them out of the boats, carried those confined to their beds, all the way from the beach to the hospital, and gently supported those who had strength barely to walk; and when safely lodged, they were immediately supplied with eggs, milk, fowls and vegetables already cooked.
'I was absent a while on a survey of the coast; and on my return I was glad to find the sick men much recovered, and very grateful for the kindness of the natives. The best provisions had been brought to them every day; and when disposed to take exercise, they were sure to be accompanied by some of the natives, who helped them up the steep side of the hill behind the hospital, to a grassy spot on the summit, and having lighted pipes for them, remained patiently till the invalids wished to return. Never were sailors so caressed ; and it was pleasing to observe our hardy seamen so much softened, that they laid aside for the time all the habitual roughness of their manners, and without any interference of the officers, treated the natives with the greatest consideration. Indeed, from the first hour of our visit, their amiable disposition and gentle manners won the good will of all; and, by a sort of tacit, spontaneous understanding, every one of our men treated them not only with kindness, but with entire confidence. The proud, haughty feeling of national superiority, so common among British seamen, was here completely subdued by the kind and gentle manners of this pacific people. Though continually intermingled, no quarrel or complaint occurred during all our stay ; but each succeeding day seemed to increase our mutual cordiality and friendship.
We also inquired into their government; and while partaking - of the general mildness, we deemed it highly efficient from the great order always maintained. - The chiefs, though quite decided in giving their commands, were mild in manner and expression ; and the people always obeyed them with the greatest alacrity and cheerfulness. Crimes were said to be very unfrequent; the peo-. ple went entirely unarmed; and they always declared that they had no military weapons. We looked sharply for them, but could find none. Their behavior on seeing a musket fired, showed their ignorance of fire arms; and they invariably denied having any knowledge of war by experience or tradition.'
The case of Williain Penn, however, is perhaps the fullest and fairest illustration of pacific principles in their bearing on the intercourse of pations. His colony, though an appendage to Eng. land, was to the Indians an independent State. They knew DO power above or beyond that of Penn himself; and they treated his colony as another tribe or nation. Their king had himself expressly abandoned these Quakers entirely to their own resources. 6 What!” said Charles II. to Penn on the eve of his departure, 6 venture yourself among the savages of North America! Why man, what security have you, that you will not be in their warkettle within two hours after setting your foot on their shores?" * The best security in the world,' replied the man of peace. “I doubt that, friend William; I have no idea of any security against those cannibals, but a regiment of good soldiers with their muskets and bayonets; and I tell you before hand, that, with all my good will for you and your family, to whom I am under obligations, I will not send a single soldier with you." "I want none of thy soldiers ; I depend on something better. " Better! on what?"
On the Indians themselves, on their moral sense, and the promised protection of God.
Such was the reliance of Penn; and a single fact will show his mode of dealing with the Indians. Learning that there was some very choice land not included in his first purchase, he sent to inquire of the Indians if they would sell it. They replied they did not wish to part with the land where their fathers were sleeping, but to please him, they would sell him a part of it. Accordingly, they agreed, for a certain quantity of English goods, to sell as much land as one of his young men could walk round in a day; but this mode of measurement, though their own choice, did not in the end satisfy the Indians, since the young Englishman, chosen to walk off the tract, walked much faster and farther than they expected. Penn observed their dissatisfaction, and inquired the cause. “ The walker cheat us.” “Ah! how can that be? Did you not yourselves choose to have the land mcasured in this way?' “Yes," said the Indians, “ but white brother make too big walk.” Some of Penn's commissioners, waxing warm, said the bargain was a fair one, and insisted that the Indians ought to abide by it, and, if they would not, should be compelled to do so. Compelled !' exclaimed Penn, how can you compel them without bloodshed? Don't you see this looks to murder?' Then turning with a benignant smile to the Indians, he said, "well, brothers, if you have given us too much land for the goods first agreed on, how much more will satisfy you?' This proposal gratified them much; and they mentioned the quantity of cloth, and number of fish-hooks, with which they would be satisfied. These were cheer
fully given; and the Indians shaking hands with Penn, went away smiling. After they were gone, the governor, looking round on his friends, exclaimed, “Oh, how sweet a thing is charity! Some of you just now spoke of compelling these poor creatures to stick to their bargain, that is, in plain English, to fight and kill them, and all about a little piece of land !
Such was the policy of Penn. He resolved to treat the Indians as the gospel requires, and then rely for safety on the better principles of their nature, and the promises of God. He brought no cannon; he built no forts; nor was there at his command a single musket or sword to assail or repulse an enemy. He treated none as enemies, but all as friends, and threw himself, with open-hearted confidence, upon the red man's generosity and justice. He met the rude sons of the forest as brethren; his kindness disarmed their enmity, and lulled their suspicions and fears asleep; he won their perfect confidence in his friendship; and, sitting down with them on the banks of the Delaware, they smoked together the calumet of peace and love. - Such was the course of William Penn; and what was the result? In the midst of the niost warlike tribes on this continent, the Quakers lived in safety, while all the other colonies, acting on the war-policy of armed defence, were involved almost incessantly in bloody conflicts with the Indians. Shall we ascribe this to the personal tact of William Penn? Shrewd he doubtless was ; but the success of his policy was owing mainly, if not entirely, to its pacific character. Penn was only an embodiment of his principles, and the efficacy of these is strikingly exhibited in the fact that * Pennsylvania, during all the seventy years of her peace policy, remained without harm from the Indians, but suffered, as soon as she changed that policy, the same calamities with the other colonies.
Such, then, is the efficacy of pacific principles. Not that they, or any thing else, can prevent all evil in a world like ours; but, when rightly applied, they are a far surer protection than the sword. We doubt whether they have ever been put to a fair test without proving successful; and any people who shall dare to trust these principles, will find them safe. Who seemed less likely than American Indians to feel their power? Yet how readily did they lay their tomahawks and scalping-knives at the feet of Penn, and humbly apologize for killing the only Quakers they ever attacked. “The men carried arms,' said they ; 'we supposed them to be fighters, and thought they pretended to be Quakers, merely because they were cowards.' So said the murderers of Lyman and Munson. They came with arms in their hands, and we took them for enemies. Had we known they were men of God, come to do us good, we would have done them no harm. There is no policy so safe as that of peace. Let any people abjure all war, and proclaim to the world that they will never fight under any provocation, but will be ready to settle all difficulties with other nations by umpires mutually chosen; and would any nation attack
such a people? No sooner than a duellist will now fight a woman or a child. Would not any nation be ashamed of an act so mean, and the whole world cry shame upon them, and brand them as the basest of poltroons and assassins ? .
• But experience pleads for the war-principle ; all nations have hitherto acted upon it; and does not this prove its necessity ?'No more than the extent and long continuance of paganism prove that to be necessary. Men have tried war more than five thousand years; and what is the result ? A world covered with crime, and drenched in blood and tears. Could any policy of peace have led to worse results ?
But would you have no means of defence?'_Yes, the best in the world; such as God himself has prescribed ; such as Penn used with perfect, glorious success; such as every fair trial has shown to be far more effectual than any weapons of war. We plead for the strictest principles of peace, not only because they are true, but also because they are the best security both for individuals and for nations. . But what security do these principles afford for our liberties and rights?' - The best possible; incomparably better than the sword can give. Search all history, and you will find war to have been the deadliest foe to popular freedom and rights. True, it has been alleged to have secured them both; but far more truly has it ever trampled them under its iron hoof. Peace is the best, if not the only soil for the sure and steady growth of free institutions ; and one century of universal, unbroken peace, would accomplish wonders for the liberty and rights of mankind.
But will nations ever act on the strict principles of peace?' — Individuals have, and nations may ; but whether they will or not, time alone can determine. We believe they one day will, for God has promised they shall; but until they do, surely these principles cannot be held responsible for their safety, any more than a medicine can cure those who do not take it. If all nations would adopt them, there would of course be an end to war, and the fear of its evils. We cannot flatter ourselves that the great national brotherhood of Christendom, or any of its members, will soon come fully into these views, discarding the sword as the arbiter of international disputes, and ceasing from all war, and all preparations for war; but already the whole civilized world are gradually approaching this policy; and, just as fast as they do, will their safety, as well as their general prosperity and happiness, be correspondingly increased. No fair-minded man will now deny that a pacific policy is in every respect the best; and, if we cannot bring all nations, or any one of them, up to the high standard of the gospel, we would fain bring them as near to it as we can. Our utmost efforts will doubtless leave them much below that standard; but every approximation to it will strongly tend to insure their peace, and to promote their general and permanent welfare.
AMERICAN PEACE SOCIETY, BOSTON, MASS.