De Vere as Shakespeare: An Oxfordian Reading of the Canon

Front Cover
McFarland, Dec 24, 2014 - Literary Criticism - 280 pages
The question may be met with chagrin by traditionalists, but the identity of the Bard is not definitely decided. During the 20th century, Edward de Vere, the most flamboyant of the courtier poets, a man of the theater and literary patron, became the leading candidate for an alternative Shakespeare. This text presents the controversial argument for de Vere's authorship of the plays and poems attributed to Shakespeare, offering the available historical evidence and moreover the literary evidence to be found within the works. Divided into sections on the comedies and romances, the histories and the tragedies and poems, this fresh study closely analyzes each of the 39 plays and the sonnets in light of the Oxfordian authorship theory. The vagaries surrounding Shakespeare, including the lack of information about him during his lifetime, especially relating to the "lost years" of 1585-1592, are also analyzed, to further the question of Shakespeare's true identity and the theory of de Vere as the real Bard.

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

De Vere as Shakespeare: an Oxfordian reading of the canon

User Review  - Not Available - Book Verdict

This is a compilation of current studies positing that Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford, is the real author of the Shakespeare canon rather than Will Shakespeare of Stratford-on-Avon. Yet Farina, a ... Read full review

Contents

Foreword by Felicia Hardison Londré
1
Introduction
5
Comedies and Romances
17
Histories
103
Tragedies and Poems
157
Conclusion
237
Notes
241
Bibliography
263
Index
265
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2014)

William Farina has written books on Arthurian legend, early Christianity, the American Civil War, Shakespeare and baseball. He lives in Chicago and works as a real estate consultant for the federal government.

Bibliographic information