One of the Twelve Apostles of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,

Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1874, by

DAVID O. CALDER

IN THE OFFICE OF THE LIBRARIAN OF CONGRESS, AT WASHINGTON, D. C.

CORRESPONDENCE

BETWEEN

REVEREND DR. J. P. NEWMAN,

Pastor of the Metropolitan Methodist Church, Washington, D. C.,

AND

BRIGHAM

YOUNG,

President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

TO PRESIDENT BRIGHAM YOUNG:

SALT LAKE CITY, Aug. 6th, 1870.

Sir: In acceptance of the challenge given in your journal, "The Salt Lake
Daily Telegraph," of the 3d of May last, to discuss the question, "Does the Bible
sanction Polygamy?" I have hereby to inform you that I am now ready to hold a
public debate with you, as the head of the Mormon Church, upon the above question,
under such regulations as may be agreed upon for said discussion; and I suggest for
our mutual convenience that, either by yourself or by two gentlemen whom you
shall designate, you may meet two gentlemen whom I will select for the purpose of
making all necessary arrangements for the debate, with as little delay as possible.
May I hope for a reply at your earliest convenience, and at least not later than 3 o'clock
to-day?

Respectfully, etc.,

J. P. NEWMAN.

MAN.

REV. DR. J. P. NEWMAN:

SALT LAKE CITY, U. T., Aug. 6th, 1870.

Sir:-Yours of even date has just been received, in answer to which I have to in-
form you that no challenge was ever given by me to any person through the columns
of the "Salt Lake Daily Telegraph," and this is the first information that I have re-
ceived that any such challenge ever appeared.

You have been mis-informed with regard to the "Salt Lake Daily Telegraph;"
it was not my journal, but was owned and edited by Dr. Fuller, of Chicago, who was
not a member of our church, and I was not acquainted with its columns.

Respectfully,

BRIGHAM YOUNG.

SALT LAKE CITY, Aug. 6th, 1870.

TO PRESIDENT BRIGHAM YOUNG:

Sir:-I confess my disappointment at the contents of your note in reply to mine of this date. In the far East it is impossible to distinguish the local relations between yourself and those papers which advocate the interests of your Church; and when the copy of the "Telegraph" containing the article of the 3d of May, last, reached Washington, the only construction put upon it by my friends was that it was a challenge to me to come to your city and discuss the Bible doctrine of polygamy.

Had I chosen to put a different construction on that article, and to take no further notice of it, you could then have adopted the "Telegraph" as your organ and the said article as a challenge, which I either could not or dared not accept. That I am justified in this construction is clear from the following facts:

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

1. The article in the "Telegraph," of May 3rd, contains these expressions, alluding to my sermon as reported in the N. Y. "Herald," it says: "The discourse was a lengthened argument to prove that the Bible does not sustain polygamy. * * * The sermon should have been delivered in the New Tabernacle in this city, with ten thousand Mormons to listen to it, and then Elder Orson Pratt, or some prominent Mormon, should have had a hearing on the other side and the people been allowed to decide. Dr. Newman, by his very sermon recognizes the religious element of the question. * Let us have a fair contest of peaceful argument, and let the best side win. We will publish their notices in the "Telegraph," report their discourses as far as possible, use every influence in our power, if any is needed, to secure them the biggest halls and crowded congregations, and we are satisfied that every opportunity will be given them to conduct a campaign. We base this last remark on a statement made last Sunday week in the Tabernacle by President George A. Smith, that the public halls throughout the Territory have been and would be open to clergymen of other denominations coming to Utah to preach. Come on and convert them by the peaceful influences of the Bible instead of using the means now proposed. Convince them by reason and Scriptural argument and no Cullom Bill will be required."

*

*

*

2. I understand the article containing the above expressions, was written by Elder Sloan, of the Mormon Church, and at that time associate editor of the "Telegraph; and that he was, and has since been, in constant intercourse with yourself. The expressions of the said articles, as above cited, were the foundation of the impression throughout the country, that a challenge had thus been given through the columns of the Telegraph," and as such, I myself, had no alternative but so to regard and accept it. I may add that I am informed that an impression prevailed here in Utah, that a challenge had been given and accepted. Under this impression I have acted from that day to this, having myself both spoken of and seen allusions to the anticipated discussion in several prominent papers of the country.

3. It was not till after my arrival in your city last evening, in pursuance of this impression, that I learned the fact that the same Elder Sloan, in the issue of the "Salt Lake Herald," of Aug. 3rd. attempts for the first time to disabuse the public of the idea so generally prevalent. Still acting in good faith and knowing that you had never denied or recalled the challenge of the 3rd of May, I informed you of my presence in your city and of the object of my visit here.

My note this morning with your reply, will serve to put the matter before the public in its true light and dispel the impression of very many in all parts of the country, that such a challenge had been given and that such a discussion would be held.

Feeling that I have now fully discharged my share of the responsibility in the case, it only remains for me to subscribe myself, as before,

Respectfully,

J. P. NEWMAN.

SALT LAKE CITY, Aug. 6, 1870.

REV. DR. J. P. NEWMAN:

Sir:-It will be a pleasure to us, if you will address our congregation to-morrow morning, the 7th inst., in the small tabernacle at 10 a.m., or, should you prefer it, in the New Tabernacle at 2 p.m., same inst., or both morning and evening.

Respectfully,

BRIGHAM YOUNG.

P. S. I hope to hear from you immediately.

B. Y.