What Brown V. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionLegal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 26
... rules were quite simple. Each person was asked to write an opinion using only materials available as of May 17, 1954, when the first opinion in Brown was handed down. The opinion could be structured as a majority opinion, a concurrence ...
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Contents
The History of the Brown Litigation | 29 |
A Guide to the Opinions | 44 |
Jack M Balkin judgment of the Court | 77 |
Drew S Days III concurring | 92 |
Frank I Michelman concurring in part and concurring | 124 |
Catharine A MacKinnon concurring in the judgment | 143 |
Michael W McConnell concurring in the judgment | 158 |
Cass R Sunstein concurring in the judgment | 174 |
Comments from the Contributors | 201 |
The Constitution of the United States | 233 |
247 | |
Other editions - View all
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Limited preview - 2001 |
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin No preview available - 2002 |