What Brown V. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionLegal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 75
... principles of constitutional interpretation. Herbert Wechsler of Columbia Law School famously argued in 1959 that he could not come up with a neutral principle to justify the result in the case. Critics of the philosophy of original ...
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Contents
The History of the Brown Litigation | 29 |
A Guide to the Opinions | 44 |
Jack M Balkin judgment of the Court | 77 |
Drew S Days III concurring | 92 |
Frank I Michelman concurring in part and concurring | 124 |
Catharine A MacKinnon concurring in the judgment | 143 |
Michael W McConnell concurring in the judgment | 158 |
Cass R Sunstein concurring in the judgment | 174 |
Comments from the Contributors | 201 |
The Constitution of the United States | 233 |
247 | |
Other editions - View all
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Limited preview - 2001 |
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin No preview available - 2002 |