What Brown V. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionLegal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 38
... majority opinion, a concurrence, or a dissent. The participants were allowed to predict events if they chose but they could not refer to anything in the future as fact. Thus, they could not cite a 1995 study on school desegregation or a ...
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Contents
The History of the Brown Litigation | 29 |
A Guide to the Opinions | 44 |
Jack M Balkin judgment of the Court | 77 |
Drew S Days III concurring | 92 |
Frank I Michelman concurring in part and concurring | 124 |
Catharine A MacKinnon concurring in the judgment | 143 |
Michael W McConnell concurring in the judgment | 158 |
Cass R Sunstein concurring in the judgment | 174 |
Comments from the Contributors | 201 |
The Constitution of the United States | 233 |
247 | |
Other editions - View all
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Limited preview - 2001 |
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin No preview available - 2002 |