What Brown V. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionLegal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 40
... these, usually called Brown I, was decided on May 17, 1954. It held that state-enforced racial segregation of public school children violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The second opinion, decided ix Preface.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Contents
The History of the Brown Litigation | 29 |
A Guide to the Opinions | 44 |
Jack M Balkin judgment of the Court | 77 |
Drew S Days III concurring | 92 |
Frank I Michelman concurring in part and concurring | 124 |
Catharine A MacKinnon concurring in the judgment | 143 |
Michael W McConnell concurring in the judgment | 158 |
Cass R Sunstein concurring in the judgment | 174 |
Comments from the Contributors | 201 |
The Constitution of the United States | 233 |
247 | |
Other editions - View all
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Limited preview - 2001 |
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin No preview available - 2002 |