What Brown V. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionLegal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 65
... desegregation or a law review article written in 1996, although they were free to make any arguments or predictions about the future they wanted. Although the opinions were to be written as of 1954, a few anachronisms remain. In 1954 ...
... desegregate their schools “with all deliberate speed.” I asked the participants to draft an opinion that addressed the ... desegregation that occurred first in the South and later in the North. The goal is not to come up with the magic ...
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Contents
The History of the Brown Litigation | 29 |
A Guide to the Opinions | 44 |
Jack M Balkin judgment of the Court | 77 |
Drew S Days III concurring | 92 |
Frank I Michelman concurring in part and concurring | 124 |
Catharine A MacKinnon concurring in the judgment | 143 |
Michael W McConnell concurring in the judgment | 158 |
Cass R Sunstein concurring in the judgment | 174 |
Comments from the Contributors | 201 |
The Constitution of the United States | 233 |
247 | |
Other editions - View all
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin Limited preview - 2001 |
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin No preview available - 2002 |