...to be within the contemplation of the contracting parties when the contract was made," in which case "they will not be held bound by general words which, though large enough to include it, were not used with reference to the possibility of the particular contingency which afterwards...

...the event is of such a character that it cannot be supposed to have been in the contemplation of tho contracting parties when the contract was made, they...general words which, though large enough to include, wero not used with reference to tho possibility of the particular contingency which afterward happens."...

...promissor. But where the event is of such a character that it cannot reasonably be supposed to have been in the contemplation of the contracting parties when...happens. It is on this principle that the act of God is iu some cases said to excuse the breach of a contract. This is in fact an inaccurate expression, because,...

...promissor. But where the event is of such a character that it cannot reasonably be supposed to have been in the contemplation of the contracting parties when...particular contingency which afterwards happens." The plaintiff in the case above abstracted, was accordingly held to be one of a numerous class of persons...

...promisor. But where the event is of such a character that it cannot reasonably be supposed to have been in the contemplation of the contracting parties when...words which, though large enough to include, were not useJ with reference to the possibility of the particular contingency •which afterwards happens. It...

...be supposed to have been in the contemplation of the contracting parties when the contract was madt, they will not be held bound by general words which,...were not used with reference to the possibility of 1he particular contingency which afterwards happens. It is on this principle that the act of God is...

...promisor. But where the event is of such a diameter that it cannot reasonably be supposed to have been in the contemplation of the contracting parties when...particular contingency which afterwards happens. It it on this principle that the act of God is in (a) Reynard v. Arnold, 10 Ch. timeret, quamvis periculum...

...said — "Where the event is of such a character that it cannot reasonably be supposed to have been in the contemplation of the contracting parties when...particular contingency which afterwards happens." 3 It is on this principle that the "act of God" is in ,some cases said to excuse the breach of a contract....

...supposed to have been in the contemplation of the contracting parties when the contract was made that they will not be held bound by general words, which,...possibility of the particular contingency" which afterwards happened. Chicago, etc., Ry. v. Hoyt, 149 US 14, 13 Sup. Ct. 779, 37 L. Ed. 625. Cf. Rowe v. Peabody,...

...that It cannot be reasonably supposed to have been In the contemplation of the contracting parties. they will not be held bound by general words which, though large enoneh to include, were manifestly not used with reference to, the possibility of the particular contingency...