Cruel and Unusual Punishment: Rights and Liberties Under the Law
In one of the lengthiest, noisiest, and hottest legal debates in U.S. history,Cruel and Unusual Punishment stands out as a levelheaded, even-handed, and thorough analysis of the issue.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
American argued Arizona armed robbery attorneys Bajakajian Bill of Rights capital punishment century certiorari Chief Justice claim committed consensus consider Constitution constitutionally convicted counsel Court held Court of Appeals crime criminal cruel and unusual death penalty death row death sentence decision declared defendant defendant’s deterrence disproportionate dissent due process Eighth Amendment Enmund evolving standards excessive execution federal courts felony felony murder Florida Fourteenth Amendment Furman Georgia Gregg guilty habeas corpus human impose the death imposition imprisonment inflicted inmates ishment issue judge judgment judicial jury Justice Blackmun kill legislative legislatures lethal injection Lockett McCleskey McCleskey’s ment mentally retarded mitigating evidence mitigating factors moral murder opinion parole Penry Penry’s person petitioner petitioner’s prison procedures prohibited proportionality rape reason sentenced to death sentences imposed Solem standards of decency State’s Supreme Court tence tion Tison trial United unusual punishment victim violates the Eighth
Page 205 - He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise ; the State remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
Page 63 - That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed; nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Page 203 - That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king ; and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal.
Page 301 - The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.
Page xi - Let me add that a bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference.
Page 202 - No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land.
Page 203 - AN ACT DECLARING THE RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF THE SUBJECT, AND SETTLING THE SUCCESSION OF THE CROWN.
Page 200 - Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife, nor his man-servant, nor his maid-servant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor anything that is thy neighbor's.
Page 204 - That the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of parliament.
Page 288 - ... (3) if raised by the evidence, whether the conduct of the defendant in killing the deceased was unreasonable in response to the provocation, if any, by the deceased.