to churches in Western Australia and later in Queensland) the same testimony is borne of him. He combines in a rare manner singleness of spirit with a strength of character which cannot fail to win affection and command confidence. What impressed and greatly delighted me in my friend was the utter absence of anything approaching vindictiveness. Not a bitter word has he spoken of the Church in which he had been reared and trained. The love for his old Church is deep, and its depth is the measure of the intensity of the struggle which separated him from her. His references to his confreres in the Church are always not only generous, but affectionate. This non-retaliative spirit has defeated the persecution to which he has been subjected since his secession, persecution which has not scrupled to use calumny and lying of the grossest kinds. They have, however, failed to provoke a retort. He has criticised, but never abused. Those whose condemnation and rejection of Papacy depend upon piquant revelations and innuendoes will look in vain for them in this volume. That men fail under the unnatural strain which the Roman Church puts upon its priests is to be expected. The wonder. is that so many maintain a high standard of virtue. Mr. Enright does not seek to make capital out of the moral disasters for which the system must be largely responsible. He attacks the Church in its very strength, and is confident that the reasons which constrained him to break some of the strongest and tenderest ties of life will suffice to convince others. If he fail in this, he is prepared to accept failure. If those within the fold of the Roman Church will be led to read the following pages, they will, I am sure, be compelled to recognise in this ex-priest one who is a fair and even a magnanimous critic. Mr. Enright has helped largely to modify and change the method of attack from the Protestant camp, and is destined to accomplish much more yet in this direction. My intercourse with him has strengthened my faith in Protestantism, while at the same time it has softened and chastened my aversion to the Romanist conception and helped me to appreciate its many excellent features, and to think with more tender charity of its numerous failures. This effect upon myself and many of my brethren to whom I have introduced Mr. Enright will, I am satisfied, be the effect of this volume. Such, I know, is the aim of the author. May God grant him the desire of his heart. W. H. LEWIS, Ex-Chairman of the Western Australian and Queensland Congregational Unions, and present pastor Congregational Church, Newtown, Sydney. To My Fellow-Traveller, the Reader. I find that Holy Writ in many places Hath semblance with this method where the cases Truth's golden beams; nay, by this method may Commit both me and it into that Hand That pulls the strong down, and makes weak ones stand. The man that seeks the everlasting prize. It shows you whence he comes, whither he goes, What he leaves undone, and what he does. It also shows how he runs and runs Till he into the gate of glory comes. It shows, too, who set out for life amain To My Late Colleagues in the Roman Priesthood. This book will make a traveller of thee, Yea, it will make the slothful active be; Art thou forgetful? Would'st thou remember This book is writ in such a dialect As may the minds of listless men affect. Nothing but sound and honest Gospel strains. -JOHN BUNYAN. Nota Bene. The italicising of the lines is mine. PREFACE. -JOHN ENRIGHT. MY Y chief reason in issuing this work is to spread that I wish to acknowledge my deep spirit of gratitude to those authors and writers from whom I have freely quoted, also to the Rev. W. H. Lewis, Brisbane, my father in the Protestant Faith, for his many wise suggestions in the compilation of this volume, and notably for his valued preface. I would also acknowledge my indebtedness to some works by the Rev. Thomas Connellan that I have read and which have greatly helped me. CONTENTS. THE POSITION. Chapter I.-"Buckle"-My Offence, My Sin, My Crime, FANATICISM. Chapter II.-Reasons for Statement-Dr. O'Reiley, Arch- MINOR REASONS. Chapter III.-Rev. F. W. Robertson-Fremantle Evening "LEAD, KINDLY LIGHT." Chapter IV.-The "Index"-My Little Brown Bag-The FOREWORD TO MAJOR REASONS. Chapter V.-Shirking the Searchlight-The Dominant Chapter VI.-E. Maitland-The Roman Position-Enter- ing into Conflict-The Famous Decree of 1870-It Fails to Carry Me Through-My Grief Then, and Its Cause-Further Chapter VII.-Closer Study of the Sacred Scriptures-What They Did Not Prove to Me-Mr. Gladstone and Cardinal Newman-Not Taught by the Master nor Enforced by the Apostles-From Gladstone's "Vatican Claims"-In a Maze- Chapter VIII.-Tradition: What It Did Not Prove to Me-Agatha-Leo - Irenæus-Optatus-Jerome Modes of Argument that Failed-Councils: Fourth of Constance, Second of Lyons-Florence-Vienna-Three Peculiar Facts Adduced as Proofs-A Fourth Peculiar Fact-"Gratis asseriturs" Not Chapter IX. "Nemo dat quod non habet"-Still Burrow- ing-Four Necessary Conditions-"Master, what shall I do to be saved?"-Non-necessity for Two Infallible Authorities Chapter X.-Ecumenical Council-Vatican Council, 1870, |