Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

PRINTED AND SOLD BY TAYLOR AND WILLMER, RANELAGH STREET;

SOLD ALSO BY ALL THE BOOKSELLERS.

1820.

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

ADDRESS.

In presenting to the Public the following pages, the publishers deem it necessary to state, that it has been their desire to collect, without partiality, every production that has issued from the press during the Election. In adhering to this object, they disclaim the slightest intention of giving offence to either party.

RANELAGH-STREET PRINTING-OFFICE.

[ocr errors]

ELECTION,

IN British polity, is the people's choice of their representatives in parliament. In this consists the exercise of the democratical part of our constitution: for in a democracy there can be no exercise of sovereignty but by suffrage, which is the declaration of the people's will. In all democracies, therefore, it is of the utmost importance to regulate by whom, and in what manner, the suffrages are to be given. And the Athenians were so justly jealous of this prerogative, that a stranger, who interfered in the assemblies of the people, was punished by their laws with death; because such a man was esteemed guilty of high treason, by usurping those rights of sovereignty to which he had no title. In Britain, says Blackstone, where the people do not debate in a collective body, but by representation, the exercise of this sovereignty consists in the choice of representatives. The laws have therefore very strictly guarded against usurpation or abuse of this power, by many salutary provisions; which may be reduced to these three points, 1. The qualifications of the electors. 2. The qualifications of the elected. 3. The proceedings at elections.

1. As to the qualifications of the electors. The true reason of requiring any qualification, with regard to property, in voters, is to exclude such persons as are in so mean a situation, that they are esteemed to have no will' of their own. If these persons had votes, they would be tempted to dispose of them under some undue influence or other. This would give a great, an artful, or a wealthy man a larger share in elections than is consistent with general liberty. If it were probable that every man would give his vote freely, and without influence of any kind; then, upon the true theory and genuine principles of liberty, every member of the community, however poor, should have a vote in electing those delegates to whose charge is committed the disposal of his property, his liberty, and his life. But since that can hardly be expected in persons of indigent fortunes, or such as are under the immediate dominion of others, all popular

b.

« PreviousContinue »