Page images
PDF
EPUB

you will.

The Jury having considered of the Evidence
some time, gave in their Verdict.
Cl. of Arr. Gentlemen of the jury, are you
agreed of your verdict?
Jury. Yes.

Cl. of Arr. Who shall say for you?
Jury. The foreman,

known tongue; and further says, that he gave | think you need not stir from the bar, but do as the Sacrament to seven or eight according to the manner of the Church of Rome in a wafer, at Mrs. Stamford's house in Wolverhampton. Jarvis, the other witness, swears that he hath been at confession with him, and hath oftentimes received the Sacrament of him. Here are two other honest men, that speak very full as to circumstances; so that in the whole you cannot have a more clear evidence: and, gen. tlemen, I must tell you, it is to these sorts of men we owe all the troubles and hazards we are in, the fear of the king's life, the subversion of our government, and the loss of our religion. It is notorious by what they have done, that they are departed from the meekness and simplicity of Christ's doctrine, and would bring in a religion of blood and tyranny amongst us. As if God Almighty were some omnipotent mischief, that delighted and would be served with the sacrifices of human blood. I need not say more to you, the matter's plain; I

Cl. of Arr. Gaoler, set up William Atkins. [Which was done.] Gentlemen of the jury look on the prisoner. What say you, Is he Guilty of the High-treason whereof he stands indicted, or Not Guilty? Jury. Guilty.

Cl. of Arr. What lands, goods or tenements had he?

Jury. None to our knowledge.

Cl. of Arr. Look to him, Gaoler, he is found Guilty of high-treason.

He received the sentence usual in cases of high-treason.

257. The Trial of FRANCIS JOHNSON, a Franciscan, at Worcester, for High Treason: 31 CHARLES II. A. D. 1679. [Written by Himself.*]

I BEING at London on All Saints-day, when the proclamation came forth to command all Catholics to depart from thence by the Friday following, I obeyed, and came to a friend's house in Worcestershire, not intending to stay there; but the king's second proclamation being presently published, That no Catholics should walk above five miles without being stopt, and carried before a justice to have the oaths tendered, I asked counsel of the wisest I could, both of Protestants (whereof one was a lawyer) and another a constable, as also of Catholics, Whether that proclamation did so strongly oblige, that it permitted me no longer to go further? They all concluded it was not secure to go, so I resolved to obey, and stay where I was, and with good reason.

First, Because all Catholics are obliged to obey the king's commands in all things that are not against our religion and conscience, and his commands in this nature are against neither. Secondly, Should I have disobeyed, and have been taken, in penalty I should have suffered, which would not have been so directly for my conscience and religion sake, as for disobeying the king's command; because in case I should be taken by staying there in obedience to the proclamation, and be carried before the justices to have the oaths offered, whatever I was to suffer for refusing them, I should have this

* From a Pamphlet entitled; "A NARRATIVE of the proceedings and trial of Mr. FRANCIS JOHNSON a Franciscan, at Worcester, last Summer-Assizes, a. D. 1679; Written with his own band as followeth: To which is annexed his Speech at his Execution, August 22, 1679."

double comfort before God, and the king; before the king, because I rather chose to stay there, than remove against his command; be-fore God, because I rather chose to go to prison, than to remove from his law, by taking the oaths against my conscience-Therefore I was taken and put in prison.

The Manner of my being taken was as followeth:

The Sheriff's deputy came to the house where I was with six or eight taen, to arrest a gentleman in the house for debt: The officers coming into the house in the morning, and not finding the person they came for, broke down all the doors, and among the rest mine, before I was out of bed, and by a mistake arrested me, instead of the other gentleman; and although the deputy, coming into my chamber, looking on me, told them they were deceived, for I was not the man they came for; yet other soldiers coming into my chamber, one of them said he knew me: It seems he had been a servant in the house seven years before, therefore he said he would have me to the justices, and bid his companions secure me, and so they did, and would not let me go out of their sight,until they carried me before the justice; And this they did, without either constable, or warrant, law or justice.

When I came before the justice of peace, I told him the occasion that had brought me to him; and if I would have taken the oaths, I had been presently freed: But I told them that persuaded me to take the oaths, That it was against the faith and religion I professed, and against my conscience, and I would never of

fend against either by so complying, whatever I suffered for the contrary.

The justice's wife was compassionate to wards me, and desiring to speak privately with me, she used her best persuasions to me to comply with what was desired of me concerning the taking the oaths, for fear of further trouble or danger. I answered her with thanks, and told her, That I was sorry she had no better opinion of me, than to think I had profest such a faith and religion all my life-time, and now upon the trial could be moved with any fear or danger (which God forbid) I told her it was such a faith, that in it I deposed my soul, my confidence, heaven and eternal life, and therefore I never did, nor (by God's grace) never would fear to suffer for it what pleased God; For who could fear even death itself of the body whose life is momentary, for profession of that faith wherein he deposeth the eternal life of his soul?

This answer satisfied both her and myself, for I was resolved to make a public profession of my faith and religion; upon which I returned to the justice, who thought tit I should go to another justice, who was sir John Packing ton, whither also he went with me.

When I came to sir John, he asked me who I was? I answered him, I was a gentleman sufficiently known for these 20 years in Worcestershire to all sorts of people. He asked me of what calling I was? I answered him, of none. He asked me what estate I had? I answered I was no landed-man. Then he asked me, If I would take the oaths? I answered, I understood them not. He replied, Will you take them, or will you not? I told him if he pleased to let me see them, I should return him my

answer.

Now the reason why I desired to see the oaths, was, because I was resolved to make a public declaration of my faith, that they were against my conscience, and therefore by declaring publicly the reasons why I could not take them, it should be publicly known, that whatsoever I was to suffer for not taking them, was for no other cause but for my faith and religion, because I would not swear against my conscience-For, would I have taken them, I had been there also freed..

When the oaths were brought to me, they told me I must read them out aloud, but I told them that because it was a public place, and many there present of several degrees, as well of the householders, as strangers, I feared least reading them aloud, some that heard me might think I swear what I read, and so might go and report they heard me take the oaths before the ju tices.. But they declared they would not think so, so I read them over and over, which when I had done, I said aloud, God save the king; and then declared to both the justices, and all the rest in this manner.

I am ready to swear as followeth : That I ever all my life-time have been, and now am, and ever will be to my last breath, as

faithful a subject to the king, as any subject whatsoever, and as faithful as if I should take the oaths now offered by them to me an hundred times over; but as for taking these oaths offered nie, I could not take them whatever I suffered, and the reason was, because I understood what an oath was, and the conditions which God has prescribed to us, before any could call him to witness lawfully in taking of any such oaths.

told them were these. The Conditions which God has prescribed I

Thou shalt swear the Lord liveth in truth, and in judgment, and in righteousness; so that in every oath, the life of God, the truth of God, the judgment of God and his righteousness, are included by all which we swear, and the oath we take is to have all these conditions, truth, judgment, and righteousness, Jerem. 4.--Therefore if I should take these oaths which are concerning damnable doctrines and heresies, I must call God to witness that I no more believe him to be a living God and true God, a just and righteous God, than I believe these things contained in the oaths to be true, just and righteous, to swear to which oaths I do not nor cannot in my conscience believe to be so. For, before I or any man else can understand the contents of these oaths to be true, as to call God to witness that I believe them to be as true, just and righteous, I must be able to define what is faith or heresy in these contents I swear to, and I must know the full extent of all cases of this nature that God has left to all temporal princes and their power; I must also understand the full extent of all cases of this nature of power spiritual which God bath left in his church in or over christian kingdoms of temporal monarchs, which power in these oaths I am to swear on the one side, and forswearing the other.

I told them I was not of capacity nor knowledge to set the confines to each power, or to determine or define the extent given by God to all in this nature, so as to swear and call God to witness I am as sure of it, as I am sure he is a living God, as I must do if I take these oaths, the extent of which I did not understand in my conscience to be so as to believe them ; Therefore I could not nor would not swear to them. I having spoken these things, nobody said any more to me, but the justices going out of the hall made my mittimus and sentence for Worcester prison, because I would not take the oaths they tendered me.

I have been since called to the bar at the sessions, where I spake to the same effect before Judge Street, and the justices, as I had spoken before to sir John Packington, having first asked their leave to speak, which they gave me for a little time, and then bid me return to the prison. But first they were urgent with me to answer positively, Ay or No, was I jesuitical priest, or was I not? To which I answered, It was an easy thing for me to say No, but by saying No, I might prejudice others, who here

after being asked the same question, if they did not answer No, it might be an argument that they were guilty, if they did not deny it, as others before them had done.-Therefore I desired that what proof could be brought against Ine, might be produced against me, and I would answer for myself: But I desired I might not be urged to answer Ay or No, to any thing, before some witness or argument came against me; for, I told them in such cases, neither law of God nor man obliged any one (although he was guilty) to bear witness against himself without some proof were alledged against him, for, that was no less than to be his own executioner.

The judge answered there were witnesses would swear against me.

[ocr errors]

I answered, if witnesses could make out what they swear of me, then my life was at the king's mercy: But in the mean time I told them I remained guiltless, though I did not answer them to their questions Ay or No, because I told them that being my saying No in my own behalf would not be sufficient testimony to acquit me, therefore there was no reason why any man should be urged to say Ay to accuse one-self though he was guilty.

command they suffer) to release them. And in the mean time they will have this comfort, That they give a testimony they fear God, and honour the king; they fear Ged, because they choose rather to suffer persecution, than swear against their consciences; they honour the king, because they are willing to suffer the penalties he commands, and yet remain faithful subjects to him, whom God long preserve, with his parliament and people, in all happiness.

judge Atkins at Worcester, to have my cause On Tuesday, April 15, 1679. I came before tried at the Sessions, having been committed 5 months before to Worcester-Castle by two justices of the peace, sir John Packington, and Mr. Townson, because I refused the oaths of supremacy and allegiance, and therefore was suspected to be a Jesuitical Priest.

The manner of my Trial was as followeth:

Four Witnesses were brought in against me; three of them were forced by warrant to come in, whether they would or no, from several towns, and were forced to speak all that they knew, had heard, or seen, concerning me; neither I, nor any of my friends knowing, that any would be compelled so to do, before the time of my trial was come. The fourth wit

who, the same day that I was first brought to
Worcester prison, offered himself to swear be-
fore the mayor of the town, that I was a priest,
before ever he cante to see who I was.

fore the judge, was this:
The Testimony which he gave against me be-

He swore he had been at confession with me, and that he had received the Sacrament at my hands about 2 years before at his father's house, whilst he was a catholic; and after he became a protestant, he said I told him afterward he should turn back from whence he had fallen, else he would be damned.

Upon this the judge sent me to prison again at Worcester, where now I am, which imprison-ness came of his own accord for lucre sake, ment, in these times especially, when none can send to their friends, nor friends come to them, is the best means to teach us how to put our confidence in God alone in all things; and then he will make his promise good, That all things shall be added to us, Luke 12, which chapter, if every one would read, and make good use of, a prison would be better than a palace; and a confinement for religion, and a good conscience-sake, more pleasant than all the liberties the world could afford. As for ny own part, God give me his grace, and all faithful Christians their prayers, I am happy enough; and as for others, I beseech God that the evil example of those that swear against their consciences, may not be guides for the rest to follow, nor their deeds a rule to their actions. We all ought to follow the narrow way, though there be many difficulties in it: It is an easy thing to run the blind way of liberty, but God deliver us all from broad, sweet ways. We know what Job saith of libertines, They lead their lives in the goods of this world, and in a moment they descend into hell. But, as our Saviour saith, What doth it profit a man to gain the world, and lose his soul?

The other three witnesses that were forced to come in against me, when they came before the grand jury, and were urged to take their oaths, to tell that which they never had known nor seen concerning my being a priest, they all unanimously declared, That they had nothing to say against me, and that they were by violence forced to appear there, and therefore they said they would never swear nor say any thing against me, for they knew nothing to accuse me of: which when the jury heard, they called for the gaoler to take the party that first denied God gave Job a goodly increase for all the to swear to prison, thinking by this violent way riches he took from him, and blest his latter end of proceeding so to affright them, that they more than his beginning, and gave him 140 should say something, out of which advantage years of flourishing life for his short affliction, should be taken against me; which the better in which, his constancy and faith in God was to effect, they made them first lay their hands tried; and our Saviour promiseth an hundred on the Bible, and then kiss it, which they did. fold to all that leave goods, and every thing wil- Then the jury told them, that now they were to lingly for his sake. Who well considers this, tell all the truth according as they were asked. will be content to leave both friends and for--First they asked whether any of them had tunes, and freedom by imprisonment, for their faith and religion-sake, till such time as it shall please God and the king (in obedience to whose

ever heard me read? One answered, yes, the Bible, and sometimes any other book. Then they asked, Whether they had ever scen me

pray? It was answered, yes. Then they asked what cloaths I had on when I prayed? And whether I used to change my cloaths when I came to pray? In these and other like questions they sifted them, to get out any thing that might do me hurt.

mon's were to them; and as great a gift from God to me, as theirs to them; and therefore God has laid as great an obligation on me to defend myself and my life, as he had on them for theirs, and also had given to every one a strict command not to impair or prejudice me in the least, no more than the greatest potentate. Therefore being I was now brought be

concerns me, lay at stake, and my life, and my credit, I did humbly beseech his lordship to proceed accordingly with me, as I presumed according to his prudence and worth he would. He assented to what I petitioned, and did bid

But how charitable or Christian-like these proceedings of the jury, were, let the world judge now, as God will hereafter; for, if this before him in a case, where the world as much as a charitable way of proceeding among Christians, that our neighbours should by such strange violence, as by warrant and oath be brought against their wills from any part of England, to swear whatever they have seen, heard, or known of their neighbours, what hor-me speak for myself. rid confusions and odiums must this make among all sorts of people both friends and foes? -But I do not blame those three witnesses, after they had been inconsiderately induced to lay their hands upon the Bible, and kiss it; II staid all night.—But as for this witness, I was Suppose they judged themselves bound to say what they did.

In answer therefore to the first voluntary witness against me, I told his lordship it was true, I had been at such a night at his father's house, and accordingly, as I was desired by him,

a stranger to him, and he to me, as he confest himself. Then the judge. asked him, whether After this, when the jury had got out of them he knew me before or no? For he declared what they could, the four witnesses and I were publicly, that he never knew me, nor saw me called before the judge. The first witness that before or since, till he saw me at Worcester, came to swear against me, as the custom is, re- and yet he said the next morning he made his peated his testimony over again before the confession to me, and I gave him the communion judge, and so did the other three that were at mass as he supposed in my chamber; but forced; which when I heard how absurd and he said that none of all the family was present insignificant some of their testimonies were, I at that time, only he and I alone; whereupon inconsiderately smiled, at which the judge being I desired the judge to consider what possible offended, I hambly begged his pardon, and told likelihood could be of the truth in this his af him I was sorry for it.-But forasmuch as firmation, that I should come to a house where laughing or smiling were passions of nature, I was acquainted with them all, father, mother, over which no man had a free course or power, and children, with all but this witness who as I hoped and beseeched him not to impute it to he declared knew me not, nor ever had seen me me; he told me he would not be displeased at before, what likehood is there I should say me for it. Then he asking me, whether I was mass before him alone, hear his confession, and guilty, or not guilty of my accusations? and I give him the sacrament, and so go away withanswering, Not Guilty, he bad me shew it, by out any one of the family (with whom I was answering for myself; I told him I was ready so well acquainted) bearing, seeing, or knowto do it; but told him first, I had an humble ing the least of this that past between him and petition to his lordship, which was, that I de- ine. I therefore desired my lord to ask him, sired a full and free liberty without hindrance whether I spake of confession or communion? to answer to every objection, and plead for my or what I said to him when I gave it him? or self; I also desired he would reflect in my be- whether I told him I would give him the sacrahalf, that as he was to be iny judge, so he was meut? which when the judge had asked him, to be my advocate. And forasmuch as all he answered, that indeed I never had spoken earthly judges were to imitate the heavenly to him either about confession or communion judge, who as advocate ten thousand times miti- to come to either; neither did he know what I gates the severity of a judge, whilst his hand of said to him, when I gave him bread like a mercy is infinitely stretched forth beyond the wafer; but he of his own accord did desire hand of judgment. And therefore I begged of me to hear his confession, and give him the his lordship, that I might find the favour of an wafer which he took.-Whereupon the judge advocate from him, rather than the rigour of a asked how it came to pass that he, never havjudge, especially in those things which accord-ing known nor seen me before, nor I spoke with ing to law may be advantageous or disad-him about confession or communion, how could vantageous to me, which I understanding not he now tell who I was, or how could he desire how to make the best use of them, desired his such a thing of me who was a mere stranger lordship would vouchsafe to do it for me; which to him, neither of us knowing any thing of one that the better he might be moved to do, I de- another's condition; sure, said the judge, we do sired he would be pleased to consider that this not give the commuinon on sach terms.-To my life and concerns were (in comparison of which he answered, that his father had told him others greater) not so much considerable, I that if he would be might confess to me, and being but a private person, yet my little was to that I would give him the communion.-So alme much, because iny little was my all; and though he had sworn before, that none in the my life to me were as much as Cæsar's or Solo-house was witness or saw him confess or re

ceive, yet rather than be confounded, he would bring his father into confusion, and accuse him as guilty of being the cause of what he did, which might be the ruin of his family.

But the judge taking no notice of what he had accused his father, spake to me, and told me, by this it might appear, that I had taken upon me what belonged to the priests office, by hearing his confession, and giving him the wafer. To which I replied, that with his leave, I would make it appear, that all which this witness had said against me, did not at all prove me to be a priest, or to have taken the office of a priest upon me: for all he said I had done, I might do it lawfully though no priest, so might other men that never were nor would be priests do the same, as many thousands had done and did do through the world. He asked me how I could prove that? I answered, as to bis confession he spoke of, in the nature he declared it, it was only an act of charity for me to do as I did, and every christian's duty obliges every man to do the same that he said I had done for him, and the same was practised by all sects whatsoever, that never knew what belonged to priesthood; For, if our neighbour have any thing that perplexed his mind, there is no better way to ease it, than by speaking of it to any whom he supposed might know how to take away or mitigate his grievances by counsel or advice; And therefore this witness having understood something from his father, that might move him to confide in me, came of his own accord, as he said he did, to impart his mind to me, and therefore I should not have fulfilled christian duty, if I should have slighted his trouble, and not have given him leave to ease his mind to me, and, in the best way I could, endeavour to assist him, and divert his trouble, though I was a stranger, being that he of his own accord, as he said, came to me for that intent, and therefore I desired the judge to ask him, if it were otherwise than what I had told his lordship?

The judge replied that I went further; for, as he says, I give him the wafer or communion. I answered, that suppose I had given him the wafer or communion (which whether I did or no I was not certain) yet according to his own word, this could no way prove that I gave him the sacrament; for, let him speak if I told him it was so; or let him declare if I said any thing to him concerning the communion, or what I said; he could not say I did, only I gave him something; therefore I told the judge, that if he pleased to give me leave, I would tell his lordship what practice ever had been, and is constantly used in the catholic church throughout the world, in giving hallowed bread or water, which is nothing belonging to the communion or sacrament; for I told my lord, as there was holy water kept in all private houses, as well as in the chapels, and places of prayer, so there was also holy bread, and, sometiines of the same nature as the wafer or the communion, and of this as well as of the other sort of bread, was on Sundays, and other certain

VOL. VII.

[ocr errors]

days not consecrated as the communion, but only blessed as holy water by the word and prayer, and so distributed to men, women, and little children, of two or three years old; and such like hallowed bread thousands of men, women and children, take, and may carry about them, and keep in their houses, and eat it at any time, and give it when, and to whom they would, to children, or others; and for my part, I have many times in my life taken it from others at any time; when I had it, or was in any private house where I found it, I have taken it to eat myself, and given it to any man, woman, or child, sometime they desiring it, sometime of my own accord I gave it, and so possibly I have given it to the man that witnesseth here against me; and if he know the contrary, but that it was as I said, I desire that he would speak: But he had nothing to say of me to the contrary.

I appealed to my lord to judge whether this testimony, or any other testimony this witness brought against me, were of any force or value to make me guilty in this matter, which no ways could be made out against me.

I proceeded therefore to answer his third accusation against, me, which was, that I should have told him, that if he did not return to the faith from whence he had fallen, he would be damned. To this my answer to my lord was, that I had all my life time been so fearful of such rash judgment, that I do declare it in the presence of God, as I did before him, that I had rather dye, than presume to pronounce the sentence of damnation against any man; but I told his lordship, that if he pleased to give me leave, I would relate what I had said to him, and others, upon the like occasion, which the judge being willing to hear, I told him, that I being at this man's mother in law's house, who was of no religion, no more than this witness, and the mother desiring to hear what catholics held, and the reasons for which we believe such points of faith, I told her what we held, and shewed her the proofs for what we held in her own Bible, and when she made any difficulty whether such texts of scripture were to be understood as we understood them, or in any other sense, I shewed her out of the Protestant Practice of Piety, and outofthe Protestant Common Prayer Book, that not only catholics, but all protestants understood them in such a sense; and she having those books by her, I turned those places to her to read in her own books, and so she did, and yet neither the Bible, nor Common Prayer Books, nor Practice of Piety could satisfy, or make her believe; whereupon I told her, that if she were a christian, she must believe something; for, as she believed, so she should be saved:-I told her also what the Bible declared to her, that without faith it was impossible to please God, and I bade her consider the text that saith, whatsoever is not of faith is sin; as also the txet that saith, the just man liveth by faith, and desired her to read those words of our Saviour, where he saith he that believeth shall be saved, but he that 3 B

« PreviousContinue »