Page images
PDF
EPUB

Defence of Rev. Godfridus Dellius against Bellomont's charges. 1394

Duty of self-vindication - A general denial-Selfishness of

Leisler's zeal for William III.-Tyranny of Leisler- Le-

gality of the execution of Leisler and Milbourne - Bayard's

excellent character, and Dellius's absence in Boston, dis-

prove the charge of their malice against Leisler...... 1394-1400

Bellomont's misrepresentations of Dellius in civil matters-

Patents for land obtained in a strictly legal manner In-

dians satisfactorily compensated - The deeds disprove Bello-

mont's assertion as to Dellius's sole ownership - The

Indians never rebelled because of these Patents - The King

had not asked to have Patents vacated, and the Bill had

not been signed - The deposition of Dellius was affected by

an irregular Assembly, against a strong memorial, by per-

sons of low degree, and by an illegal vote - This action

was confirmed in the Council also in an irregular and illegal

The Bill forced through by Bellomont — Illegality

in manner of obtaining Indian testimony against Dellius -

Testimony recanted by the Indians ...

1401-1407

As to moral charges; charge of drunkenness untrue Charge

of immorality untrue, as proved by the alleged letter-

Charge of improper friendship with Jesuits, untrue, as

proved by the alleged letter Bellomont's ignorance about

the land grants, as proved by his own language — The

absuridity of his charge about the forgery of testimonie'

in behalf of Dellius The real loyalty of all the Dutch

ministers to William III.- The excellent character of Flet-

Dellius - Bellomont's former bad char-

Suspended from office; and now about

America

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Jan.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

2 Bellomont to Lords of Trade Masts taken from tract of
Dellius before vacating Act had been approved by the King
Bellomont's idea of Fletcher's hypocrisy - Size of Del-

lius's tract

SYNOD OF NORTH HOLLAND, AT ALCKMAER.

1680, July 15 et seq.

Art. 9. Extracts from letters from the Indian Churches.

Extract from a letter from Rev. Casparus van Zuren, minister in New Netherland, on Long Island, dated October 30, 1678.

In this he complains, first of all, of the mutual quarrels of his combined churches, about the burden to be borne in the building of a parsonage.

He also complains of the matter of his salary, saying that the Rev. Classis as well as himself had been deceived. For although he had been promised seven hundred and fifty guilders, Holland money, that he is permitted to enjoy, at the most, not more than six hundred guilders. This is worth not more than four hundred and fifty guilders in Holland.

That he had in vain complained of this, getting nothing in reply but mockery and contempt.

That, finally, the matter was treated again at a general meeting. After several propositions, however, he could bring it no further than an offer, which was one hundred guilders less than the meeting itself confessed was his due. This loss had to be borne entirely by him. He professes that he cannot get along under the circumstances.

After several earnest debates, the meeting broke up in such confusion, that all hopes of improvement were practically cut off for him. Add to this, that free fire-wood, also promised to him, has not yet been attended to. What will be the result of all this remains as yet uncertain. He is strongly inclined to return to the Fatherland at the earliest opportunity. To this end he requests that the Rev. Classis of Amsterdam will be pleased to take to

1680

1680

heart his distressful condition, and will devise some means to relieve him, and secure his return, if there should be any opposition thereto on that side.

Extracts from a letter from Rev. Lawrence Gaasbeeck, dated 15-25 October 1679, at New York, of the following contents:

That he had also sent a letter on October 7/17, which he doubted whether we had received.

That having started (from Holland) on May 13, 1678, he had safely arrived on August 21, and had begun his services at Esopus on September 15.

Further, he describes the situation of that place and nation; the three churches to which he must minister; the order of the preaching services, and the number of members.

He says that he has begun to organize, and shall continue to organize everything on the basis of the churches of the Father land, and recently a new church, (New Paltz?) in which he shall soon preach.

Signed,

Lawrentius Gaasbeeck,

Ecclesiastes Esopiensis.

Art. 27. Labadists.

Ad Art. 32. Speaking of the Labadists and Jacob Coelman, the respective Classes report: As regards the Labadists, that they shall be watchful against them, although but a few remnants of them are any longer to be detected among us. The Rev. Correspondents from South Holland have given notice in their Acta, that the Correspondent of Friesland had reported in their Synod, that one of the ministers who had joined the Labadists had returned again.

Coelman.

As to Jacob Coelman: It is learned that he shows himself here and there, and travels from one place to another in order

« PreviousContinue »