| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1922 - 836 pages
...on the ground that from the time of the accident he was wholly incapacitated from earning any wages in the employment in which he was engaged at the time of the accident. The determination of the industrial accident board is affirmed, with costs to appellee. STEERE, CJ,... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1920 - 800 pages
...entered by the board on May 24, 1918, viz., $3.23 weekly during the period he is partially incapacitated in the employment in which he was engaged at the time of the accident, and $10.00 weekly should he again become totally incapacitated in such employment; the board further... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - Law reports, digests, etc - 1919 - 808 pages
...It was further ordered : "That if it should develop that applicant is not able to resume or continue in the employment in which he was engaged at the time of the accident, April 23, 1917, because of physical disability chargeable to said accident, said applicant is to be... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1905 - 1120 pages
...the evidence introduced on behalf of the plaintiff established the fact that he assumed the risk of the employment in which he was engaged at the time of the injury, and that he was therefore not entitled to recover. The defense of an assumed risk was set up... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1923 - 1210 pages
...weekly wages are provided in the statute. The first is that, if the injured employé shall have worked in the employment in which he was engaged at the time of the injury substantially the whole of the year immediately preceding the injury, his average annual wages... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1892 - 1274 pages
...instruct the jury that plaintiff was bound to exercise such care as was commensurate with the danger of the employment in which he was engaged at the time of the injury, and if he did not use sucli core, and by Its exercise could have avoided the injury, he could... | |
| Insurance - 1889 - 980 pages
..."total inability to labor." It was shown that the member was incapacitated to earn his livelihood at the employment in which he was engaged at the time of the accident, yet was able to earn as much or more money at some other employment. HELD— The injury of the member... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1891 - 1120 pages
...Did the deceased, as matter of law, assume the risk of the injury he suffered by reason of accepting the employment in which, he was engaged at the time of the accident The general rule is well settled that, where the master performs his whole duty to his servant in furnishing... | |
| Railroad law - 1905 - 970 pages
...the evidence introduced on behalf of the plaintiff established the fact that he assumed the risk of the employment in which he was engaged at the time of the injury-, and that he was therefore not entitled to recover. The defense of an assumed risk was set... | |
| Nebraska. Supreme Court, David Allen Campbell, Guy Ashton Brown, Lorenzo Crounse, Walter Alber Leese, Lee Herdmen, Henry Clay Lindsay, Henry Paxon Stoddart - Law reports, digests, etc - 1909 - 938 pages
...recovered from the injury so as to be able to perform labor similar and equivalent to that required in the employment in which he was engaged at the time of the accident, or was able to perform the duties of an Keith v. Chicago, B. & QR Co. engagement that was open and... | |
| |