Atlantic Reporter, Volume 15West Publishing Company, 1889 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 40
Page 9
... indorsed it to the firm , and then , un- der the firm indorsement , had the note discounted for himself , leaving the firm to pay it at maturity . These facts , N. J. ] 9 FARRINGTON v . HARRISON .
... indorsed it to the firm , and then , un- der the firm indorsement , had the note discounted for himself , leaving the firm to pay it at maturity . These facts , N. J. ] 9 FARRINGTON v . HARRISON .
Page 22
... indorsed the writ or summons to be left with the de- fendant in the cause , or appeared for his principal before the court , justice , referees , or arbitrators , where the action is pending , or given notice in writ- ing that he is ...
... indorsed the writ or summons to be left with the de- fendant in the cause , or appeared for his principal before the court , justice , referees , or arbitrators , where the action is pending , or given notice in writ- ing that he is ...
Page 61
... INDORSEMENT BY THIRD PERSON - CONSIDERATION - FOR- BEARANCE TO SUE MAKER . Mere forbearance to sue one of the makers of a ... indorsed in blank after its execution and delivery to payee . Defense , want of consid- eration . The presiding ...
... INDORSEMENT BY THIRD PERSON - CONSIDERATION - FOR- BEARANCE TO SUE MAKER . Mere forbearance to sue one of the makers of a ... indorsed in blank after its execution and delivery to payee . Defense , want of consid- eration . The presiding ...
Page 62
... indorsement was " that I would not sue . " " He said , if I would not enter my suit , or make any trouble about it , he would see the note was paid . " And again , “ When Mr. Clewley indorsed the note , it was the understanding that I ...
... indorsement was " that I would not sue . " " He said , if I would not enter my suit , or make any trouble about it , he would see the note was paid . " And again , “ When Mr. Clewley indorsed the note , it was the understanding that I ...
Page 70
... indorsed the note to one Ketcham , who had re- indorsed it to the plaintiff . The reindorsement to the plaintiff bore date July 31 , 1816 , and was sent by mail from New York to Granville . There was no evidence when it was actually ...
... indorsed the note to one Ketcham , who had re- indorsed it to the plaintiff . The reindorsement to the plaintiff bore date July 31 , 1816 , and was sent by mail from New York to Granville . There was no evidence when it was actually ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action alleged amount appear apply assignment assumpsit authority Biese bill bond charge claim codicil common pleas complainant contract conveyance conveyed corporation counsel Court of Chancery court of equity creditors damages debt deceased declaration decree deed defendant defendant's duty easement entitled equity error evidence executed executor fact farm fendant filed fraud grant Hampshire supreme court held homestead husband indorsed insolvent intention interest issue John judge judgment jurisdiction jury land legislature liable license lien ment Montpelier mortgage N. J. Eq N. J. Law N. W. Rep negligence owner paid parties payment Pennsylvania plaintiff plaintiff in error possession premises probate court proceedings purchase purpose question Railroad Railroad Co real estate reason recover rule scire facias Sikle statute suit Supreme Court testator testimony thereof tion trial trust verdict wife witness writ
Popular passages
Page 13 - The conclusion to be deduced from the authorities is that where power is given to public officers, in the language of the act before us, or in equivalent language — whenever the public interest or individual rights call for its exercise — -the language used, though permissive in form, is in fact peremptory.
Page 272 - To avoid Improper Influences which may result from Intermixing In one and the same act such things as have no proper relation to each other, every law shall embrace but one object, and that shall be expressed In the title.
Page 182 - That the people have a right to hold themselves, their houses, papers, and possessions free from search or seizure, and therefore warrants without oaths or affirmations first made, affording a sufficient foundation for them, and whereby any officer or messenger may be commanded or required to search suspected places, or to seize any person or persons, his or their property, not particularly described, are contrary to that right, and ought not to be granted.
Page 50 - States * * • and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction * * * saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it".
Page 552 - It is whatever is given for the love of God, or for the love of your neighbor, in the catholic and universal sense; given from these motives, and to these ends, free from the stain or taint of every consideration that is personal, private, or selfish.
Page 52 - Constitution was adopted, was most certainly intended and referred to when it was declared in that instrument that the judicial power of the United States shall extend 'to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction...
Page 209 - See, also, Coleman v. Duke of St. Albans, 3 Ves. Jr. 25; Gresley v. Adderly, 1 Swanst. 573. The American cases sustain the rule that, so long as the mortgagor is allowed to remain in possession, he is entitled to receive and apply to his own use the income and profits of the mortgaged estate; and, although the mortgagee may have the right to take possession upon condition broken, if he does not exercise the right, he cannot claim the rents; if he wishes to receive the rents, he must take means to...
Page 155 - The constitution of the United States provides that no state shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts.
Page 211 - ... to make, ordain and establish all manner of wholesome and reasonable orders, laws, statutes, ordinances, directions and instructions, either with penalties or without, so as the same be not repugnant or contrary to this constitution, as they may judge for the benefit and welfare of this State, and for the governing and ordering thereof, and of the subjects of the same...
Page 104 - And in determining whether it was so intended, a decisive test is, whether the vendor assumes to assert a fact of which the buyer is ignorant, or merely states an opinion or judgment upon a matter of which the vendor has no special knowledge, and on which the buyer may be expected also to have an opinion, and to exercise his judgment. In the former case there is a warranty, in the latter not.