Page images
PDF
EPUB

Mr. H. Sidney, sir, I would beg leave to observe to you, because I think it may be necessary to be considered by your committee what an opinion was giving not long since by some of these Judges about Printing; which was, that printing of news might be prohibited by law; and accordingly a Proclamation issued out. I will not take on me to censure the opinion as illegal, but leave it to your farther consideration. But I remember there was a consultation held by the Judges a little before; and they gave their opinion, that they knew not of any way to prevent printing by law; because the act for that purpose was expired. Upon which, some Judges were put out, and new ones put in; and then this other opinion was given. These things are worthy of a serious examination. For if Treasurers may raise money by shutting up the Exchequer, borrowing of the bankers, or retrenchments; and the judges make new laws by an ill construction, or an ill execution of old ones: I conclude, that parliaments will soon be found useless; and the liberty of the people an inconvenience to the government. And therefore, I think, sir, you have been well moved to endeavour to pass your censure on some of these illegal proceedings by a vote.

--

Mr. Powle. Sir, in the front of Magna Charta it is said, nulli negabimus, nulli differemus justitiam;' we will defer, or deny justice to no man to this the king is sworn, and with this the Judges are entrusted by their oaths. I admire what they can say for themselves; if they have not read this law, they are not fit to sit upon the bench: and if they have, I had almost said, they deserve to lose their heads. The state of this poor nation is to be deplored, that in almost all ages, the Judges, who ought to be preservers of the laws, have endeavoured to destroy them: and that to please a CourtFaction, they have by treachery attempted to break the bonds asunder of Magna Charta, the great treasury of our peace. It was no sooner passed, but a chief justice (Hubert de Burg) in that day, persuades the king he was not bound by it; because he was under age when it was passed. But this sort of insolence the next parliament resented, to the ruin of the pernicious Chief Justice. In the time of Rd. ii. an unthinking dissolute prince, there were Judges that did insinuate into the king, that the parliament were only his creatures, and depended on his will, and not on the fundamental constitutions of the land: which treacherous advice proved the ruin of the king, and for which all those evil instruments were brought to justice. In his late majesty's time, his misfortunes were occasioned chiefly by corruptions of the long robe; his Judges, by an extra-judicial opinion, gave the king power to raise Money, upon any extraordinary occasion, without parliament; and made the king judge of such occasions: charity prompts me to think they thought this a service to the king; but the sad consequences of it may convince all mankind, that every illegal act weakens the royal interest; and to endeavour

[ocr errors]

to introduce absolute dominion in these realms, is the worst of treasons: because whilst it bears the face of friendship to the king, and designs to be for his service, it never fails of the contrary effect.-The two great pillars of the government, are Parliaments and Juries; it is this gives us the title of free-born Englishmen for my notion of free Englishmen is this, that they are ruled by laws of their own mak ing, and tried by men of the same condition with themselves. The two great and undoubted privileges of the people, have been lately invaded by the Judges that now sit in Westminster-Hall; they have espoused Proclamations against law; they have discountenanced and opposed several legal acts, that tended to the sitting of this house; they have grasped the legislative power into their own hands, as in that instance of printing; the parliament was considering that matter, but they in the interim made their private opinion to be law, to supersede the judgment of this house. They have discharged Grand-Juries, on purpose to quell their presentments, and shelter great criminals from justice; and when juries have presented their opinion for the sitting of this parliament, they have in disdain thrown them at their feet, and told them they would be no messengers to carry such Petitions; and yet in a few days after, have encouraged all that would spit their venom against the government: they have served an ignorant and arbitrary faction, and been the messengers of Abhorrences to the king.-What we have now to do, is to load them with shame, who bid defiance to the law: they are guilty of crimes against nature, against the king, against their knowledge, and against posterity. The whole frame of nature doth loudly and daily petition to God their Creator; and kings, like God, may be addressed to in like manner, by petition, not command. They likewise knew it was lawful to petition: ignorance can be no plea, and their knowledge aggravates their crimes; the children unborn are bound to curse such proceedings, for it was not Petitioning, but parliaments they abhorred. atheist pleads against a God, not that he disbelieves a deity, but would have it so. Tresilian and Belknap were. Judges too; their learning gave them honour, but their villainies made their exit by a rope. The end of my motion therefore is, that we may address warmly to our prince against them: let us settle a Committee to enquire into their crimes, and not fail of doing justice upon them that have perverted it; let us purge the fountain, and the streams will issue pure.

The

Resolved, 1. "That the discharging of a Grand Jury by any Judge, before the end of the Term, Assizes, or Sessions, while matters are under their consideration, and not presented, is arbitrary, illegal, destructive to public justice, a manifest violation of his Oath, and is a means to subvert the fundamental laws of this kingdom. 2. That a Committee be appointed to examine the Proceedings of

3

1

the Judges in Westminster-Hall, and report the same, with their opinion thereon, to this house."

Impeachment ordered against Lord Chief Justice North.] Nov. 24. Mr. Attorney-General being called in, and examined touching the manner of issuing forth the Proclamation, stiled, A Proclamation against tumultuous Petitioning; and giving account to the house, that sir Francis North, Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas, was advising and assisting at the said drawing and passing the said Proclamation: it occasioned a debate, which terminated in the following Resolution: "That the Evidence this day given to this house against sir Francis North, Chief-Justice of the Common-Pleas, is sufficient ground for this house to proceed upon an Impeachment against bin for high Crimes and Misdemeanors;" and the heads of an Impeachment were ordered to be prepared accordingly.

whole process, but the least circumstance fully enforced and advanced, with such art and acuteness, as well answered to so great a cause, prosecuted by so high an authority, before so illustrious judges, and so august an assembly. -Some Witnesses were first produced to prove the reality, or at least the probability, of the Plet in general; but chiefly three appeared against the lord in particular, namely, Dugdale, Oates, and Turberville, the last said to be both a profligate and an indigent person. 1. Dugdale swore, That at a certain Meeting held at Tixall in Staffordshire, about the end of Aug. or beginning of Sept. 1678, the lord Stafford, with lord Aston and others, did, in the presence of the witness, give his full consent to take away the king's life, and introduce the Popish Religion. That on the 10th or 21st of Sept. this lord sent for the witness to his chamber, while he was dressing; and turning his servants out, offered him 500l. for his charges Nov. 26. The house resumed the Impeach- and encouragement, to take away the king's ment of Mr. Seymour. Resolved nem. con.life; and further told him, he should have free "That there was matter sufficient to impeach the said Mr. Seymour, on every Article exhibited against him; and ordered, that a committee be appointed to prepare the said Impeachment."

pardon of all his sins, and be sainted; for the king had been excommunicated, and was likewise a traitor and a rebel, and an enemy to Jesus Christ.' 2. Oates swore, That in 1677, both in Spain, and at St. Omers, he saw Trial of the Earl of Stafford.] Nov. 30. The several letters, signed Stafford, wherein his ldp. commons proceeded to the Trial of the earl of assured the Jesuits of his fidelity and zeal in Stafford; of which the following is an Abstract: promoting the Catholic Cause. That in 1678, The Managers for the commons, among whom being in London, his Idp. came to the chamber were the most considerable lawyers in the of father Fenwick, since executed, and there house, as serj. Maynard, sir Wm. Jones, Mr. in his presence received a Commission from Treby, &c. opened the cause with great co- him, to be Pay-Master-General to the army: piousness and eloquence: They began with whereupon his ldp. said, he must of necessity the Plot in general, and laid open the malice, go down into the country to take account how wickedness and horror of so dreadful, bloody affairs stood there; and did not doubt but at and hellish a design; they strenuously insisted his return, Grove should do the business. on the express positive oaths of the witnesses, And, speaking of the king, he further added, upon whom the credit of the Plot chiefly de- He hath deceived us a great while, and we can pended they expatiated upon Coleman's Let-bear no longer.' 3. Turberville gave an account, ters, and others, clearly proving the designs and activity of the writers: they pressed home the execrable murder of sir E. Godfrey, charged upon the Papists, as well by the oaths of selfacknowledged partners in the fact, as by a Letter sent from London to Tixall, intimating this very murder the 3rd day after it was committed: they fully displayed the Sham-Plots and Counter-Contrivances, whereby the Papists would have suborned the king's evidence, and turned all the guilt upon his majesty's most loyal subjects: they urged the firing the City, the burning the Navy, the calling in French Armies, Wild-Irish, Spanish-Pilgrims, &c. They recapitulated the several Trials of Ireland, Whitebread, Langhorn, &c. and alledged the Votes of both houses declaring the Plot. To corroborate all which, they repeated the cruelties of queen Mary, the French and Irish MasBacres, the Powder-Plot, &c. and they anatomized the wicked principles and practices of murdering, lying, equivocating, forswearing, faith-breaking, &c. imputed to the Papists as held by them lawful and meritorious. In sum, nothing was omitted, or neglected through the

of disobliging his friends by leaving his friar's habit at Doway; and thereupon went into France, in 1675, where at Paris getting acquaintance with his Idp. he proposed to the witness a way, both to retrieve his credit with his friends, and make himself happy; and this was by taking away the life of the king, who was a heretic, and a rebel against God Almighty. That when he took leave of him, his ldp. appointed to meet him at London; but he soon after returned into France, not being willing to undertake the proposals, and was discountenanced by his friends, and reduced to poverty.'-The accused lord in his Defence, alledged many things to invalidate the credit of the Plot, and particularly the Reputation of these three witnesses. It would be too long to mention all the particulars of this Trial, which lasted a whole week, and in which great skill and dexterity was used by the managers to support the credit and reputation of the witnesses, among whom they believed there was no contrivance or confederacy. They argued,

That they had made it plain and apparent in the beginning of the Trial, by the testimony of

six witnesses, by the Declarations of both houses, by Coleman's Letters, by the Trial and conviction of other traitors, that there was a general design amongst the Papists, to introduce their religion, by raising of armies, murdering the king, and subverting the government. And as to his lordship's particular case, they had three witnesses, which sufficiently proved him guilty; and so expatiated upon the danger of Popish principles,' &c. Sir William Jones exerted his skill and eloquence in a long speech, as much to prove the reality of the Plot, as the guilt of the prisoner; and thus especially argued: So that I think now none remain that do prétend not to believe it, but two sorts of persons; the one, those that were conspirators in it; and the other, those that wished it had succeeded, and do desire it may so still.' And by way of conclusion he said, 'The Evidence is so strong that I think it admits of no doubt; and the offences proved against my lord and the rest of his party are so foul, that they need no aggravation. The offences are against the king, against his sacred life, against the Protestant religion, nay against all Protestants. It is a design that appears with so dreadful a countenance to your lordships, to this great assembly, and to the whole nation, that it needs not any words I can use to make yon apprehend. His lordship made two several pathetic speeches, besides his Answers to the witnesses, and in conclusion declared, in the presence of God, of his Angels, of their lordships, and all who heard him, that he was intirely innocent of what was laid to his charge; that he left it to their lordships to do justice, and with all submission resigned himself to them.

Dec. 6. The lords, by Message, acquainted the house, that they had appointed the next day to give judgment on lord Stafford; on which the house resolved nem. con. "That this house will then go, together with their Speaker, to the bar of the house of lords, to demand Judgment against the said lord."

Dec. 7. The commons resolved, “That the Managers of the Impeachment against the lord Stafford be empowered, in case the lords should, immediately after the fact found, proceed to Judgment, to insist upon it, that it is not parliamentary for their lordships to give judgment, until it be first demanded by this house."-Mr. Speaker then left the chair, and the committee of the commons were present at the court in Westminster-hall, when the peers found the said lord Guilty of High Treason. When the Lord Chancellor, now Lord High Steward, collecting the Votes, which were 55 guilty, 31 not guilty; the said High Steward pronounced lord Stafford guilty of High Treason, who replied, 'God's holy name be praised!' And then being asked, what he could say for himself, why Judgment of Death should not pass upon him, according to law? he added, My lord, I have very little to say; I confess am surprized at it, for I did not expect it. But God's will be done; I will not murmur at it.

[ocr errors]

God forgive those who have falsely sworn against me!'

After which, the commons, with Mr. Speaker and the mace, went up to the bar of the house of lords, and, by Mr. Speaker, in the name of the commons in parliament, and of all the commons of England, demanded Judgment of High Treason.-The house then returned, and the lords by Message signified, that they were going presently to give the said Judgment.

The managing committee then went into Westminster-hall, and were present when the lords gave Judgment, &c.-At which time, the Lord High Steward made the following Speech, "That which remains now to be done, is very sad on my part; I have never given Sentence on any man, and I am very sorry I must begin with your lordship, a person of your quality and fortune, descended of noble ancestors, a great sufferer in the late times, obliged to the government for the moderation you had in the exercise of your religion; obliged to the king's father, and so much to this king: yet you have gone about not only to consult his death, but even the destroying of three whole nations, both of body and soul, as far as in you lay; of which you stand impeached by the commons, and have been found Guilty by the lords. There have been many and great conspiracies against the life of the king for the destroying of the government; and they have been carried on by consults, letters, and otherways; by the burning of London, and the death of sir E. Godfrey, the Plot hath been carried on abroad, at White-hall, and London, and your ldp, bath been concerned in them all, with a mixture of malice: You have called the king 'heretic,' and said,' he was an enemy to God Almighty;" here the proverb is verified, Curse not the king, though in the inward chamber, for the birds of the air will reveal it.' It hath pleased God to leave you to yourself, and you have digged a pit, and fallen into it yourself. God never leaves any man until they leave themselves; think not still well of your religion, and let not blind guides mislead you; true repentance is never too late, and be not persuaded not to confess that sin in public, which you possibly have been absolved of in private: for whatsoever value you set on the prayers of them you call Heretics, yet I am sure, that both they that cleared you, and those that condemned you, are sorry for your condition. I will pray for your Idp.; and this is the last time I must call you my lord." And so he pronounced Sentence of Death against him, according to the usual form in case of High Treason.*

Many writers, and in particular Mr. Worth and sir John Reresby, are of opinion, that this nobleman was selected by the commons to bear the sins of the whole five, on the presumption that he was least capable of defending himself, and that his very spirits, as well as his parts, would fail him, under the weight of such a prosecution. He was old and infirm,

are discharged this house, and the custody of the serjeant, paying your fees*.

Sir Rob. Peyton expelled.] Dec. 14. It appearing to the house by the Report made at the bar, and by the Confession of sir Rob. Peyton (a Member) in his place, that the said sir Robert had negotiated with the duke of York, by the means of the earl of Peterborough, Mrs. Cellier, and Mr. Godfrey, at such time when they were turning the Popish Plot upon the protestants." Ordered, "That Sir Rob. Peyton be expelled the house, and that he be brought to the bar, and do receive the Censure of the house upon his knees." But not being to be found, the house afterwards ordered him to be taken into the custody of the serjeant

at arms.

Dec. 15. Sir Rob. Peyton appeared at the bar upon his knees, to receive the Sentence of Expulsion.

The Speaker. Sir Robert Peyton: It is a long time that you have had reputation in the world, and that you have served as knight of the shire for the county of Middlesex. Two parliaments, the last and this, your county made a free election of you; your county had a great opinion of you; and now you are in that condition, that you have appeared to the world the man you really were not, You have made a show, and have acted a part against Popery and arbitrary power, yet really and inwardly you have sought your own advantage, and not that of your country. It is manifest, by the report from the committee, and your own defence makes it clear. Many gentlemen here, whose eyes are in their heads, their tongues and eyes have moved as well as yours. You have sat betwixt the Devil and the Witch, Mr. Gadbury and Mrs. Cellier. The dark ways you have taken show your ill designs; your company and conductors show your errand. You are fallen from being an angel to be a devil. From the beginning, you sought your own interest. To set up a common-wealth, you had 20,000 men' to inake your interest the stronger. You were bustling, like the wind, in this house, and in coffee-houses. Your county chose you to this place, not only for your interest, but for an example to other men, not with noise and thundering, but to behave yourself without vanity or ostentation. You are one of them that have played your own game and part; and that all men may take notice, you are a warning for all other members, and I hope there are none such. It shows that this parliament nauseates such members as you are. You are no longer a part of this noble body. How you will reconcile yourself to your country, is another consideration. You

had been under confinement for above ten years; was timorous by nature; had the popular tide against him; had the ablest and most zealous members of the house of commons for his prosecutors; a large and considerable body of his judges, the peers, were on the same side; and his najesty, though he pitied the victim, had not resolution enough to prevent the sacrifice." Ralph.

VOL. IV.

[ocr errors]

The King's Speech to both Houses on Alliances, and the State of Christendom.] This day his majesty made the following Speech to both | houses:

"My lords and gentlemen; At the opening of this parliament I did acquaint you with the Alliances I had made with Spain and Holland, as the best measures that could be taken for the safety of England, and the repose of christendon. But I told you withal, that if your friendship became unsafe to trust to, it would not be wondered at, if our neighbours should begin to take new resolutions, and perhaps such as might be fatal to us. I must now tell you, that our allies cannot but see how little has been done since this meeting, to encourage their dependance upon us. And I find by them that unless we can be so united at home, as to make our Alliance valuable to them, it will not be possible to hinder them from seeking some other refuge; and making such new friendships as will not be consistent with our safety. Consider that a neglect of this opportunity is never to be repaired.-I did likewise lay the matter plainly before you, touching the estate and condition of Tangier. I must now tell you again, that, if that place be thought worth the keeping, you must take such consideration of it, that it may be speedily supplied; it being impossible for ine to preserve it, at an expence so far above my power.-I did promise you the fullest satisfaction your hearts could wish, for the security of the protestant religion; and to concur with you in any Remedies, which might consist with preserving the succession of the crown in its due and legal course of descent. I do again with the same reservations, renew the same promises to you; and being thus ready, on my part, to do all that can reasonably be expected from me; I should be glad to know from you, as soon as may be, how far I shall be assisted by you; and what it is you desire from me."

Resolved, "That this house will on Saturday next take into consideration his majesty's most gracious Speech."

Debate on Popery.] The house then resolv

* Grey. "The Speaker performed his of fice in such coarse terms, and thereby so highly exasperated him, that the session was no sooner over, than he challenged him; but, instead of answering it, Mr. Williams, with more propriety than gallantry, made his complaint to the privy-council, and Sir Robert was, in consequence thereof, again committed to the Tower." Ralph.

Sir Robert took care to have the most offensive part of this Speech printed, under the following Title," A Specimen of the rhetoric, candour, gravity, and ingenuity, of William Williams, Speaker to the late house of commons, at Westminster, in his Speech to sir Robert Peyton, when he expelled him that house."

4 K

ed into a grand committee, how to secure the kingdom against Popery and Arbitrary Government. Mr. Powle in the chair.

am of opinion, we had best try something else; and although I know not what other act can be made to serve instead of that, but will either prove too weak, or too strong: yet seeing we are put upon it, we must try, that so we may not be represented as stubborn. And therefore I humbly move you, That a Bill may be brought in for the association of all his majesty's protestant subjects.

struction; hoping we shall not meet always so bad success in the house of lords: for though the too much kindness of some men, who preLord Cavendish. Sir, when I consider the tended to be for the Bill, but underhand made immanities and advantages we enjoy by the a party against it, did this time operate as excellent composure of our government both fatally, as enmity disguised in friendship useth in Church and State: how the king, as sove- to do; yet I hope that on another occasion reign, enjoys all the prerogative that can be we may have better success; not doubting but necessary to make him either great or happy; a great many lords, when they are persuaded and the people all the liberty and privilege that they shall not be able to find out any that can be pretended for their encouragement other way (as I hear they begin to despair they to be industrious, and for securing to them- shall) to secure the Protestant Religion, that selves and posterities the enjoyment of what they will join with us in the same, or some they get by their industry; how the doctrine other Bill to the same purpose: especially my of the church is void of idolatrous, super- good lords the bishops, who cannot be prestitious opinions; and the government of ty- sumed to have made peace with Rome, but to ranny, or absolute dominion: I cannot but be ready to die for the Protestant Religion; admire that there should be any body amongst and therefore, doubtless, will not long stick at ourselves, that should aim at any alteration, joining in a Bill to save it. But seeing that, and be the occasion of this day's debate. according to the course of parliaments, we are But, sir, it is too evident that such there are; not like to bring this to a trial for a long time, and that they have made a great advance to I effect their design, by many contrivances which they have pursued for a long course of years, according to the results and consultations held by Jesuits for that purpose: but above all, by converting to their religion James duke of York; the presumptive heir of the crown; and by engaging him to espouse their interest with that zeal and fervency, which usually attends new converts: especially when so great a glory Mr. Ralph Montagu. Sir, great things are is proposed, as the rooting a pestilent heresy expected from this day's debate; and we could out of three nations; and the saving of so not well have entered into it sooner; it now many souls as would depend thereon. The comes more seasonable than it would have sad effect of this conversion we have felt for done before, because of the opportunities we many years, it having had the same operations have had to feel the pulse of affairs since the in our body politic, as some sorts of lingering beginning of the session; and the time we poison bath in bodies natural; made us sick have spent in asserting the Right of Petitionand consumptive, by infecting and corrupting ing, by which the essence of parliaments, and all the food and physic which hath been ap- the foundation of the people's Liberties were plied in order to preserve us from popery and struck at. And the Trial of my lords Stafford, slavery, worse than death itself. From this and the Disinheriting-Bill could not possibly fatal act, the declination of the grandeur of have been avoided. And as our labour hath this monarchy may be dated; and to the con- not been lost in all, so I hope that at last we sequences thereof, its absolute ruin (if not shall have some benefit of that spent about the timely prevented) will be hereafter attributed. Succession-Bill. For, as it was said at the This being our case, I could not but admire to passing of the Bill, that there were a loyal see this house so long coming to consider this party that would never acquiesce in it; so I weighty point: insomuch, that, I began to do believe, there is a true Protestant party persuade myself, that either our dangers were that will never acquiesce in any thing less, than not so great as our discourses, upon some what may be sufficient for the security of their other occasions, had represented them, or that Religion; which, I am apt to believe, will end we were not in good earnest to endeavour any in that Bill. But in the mean time, that we redress. It is true, when we consider what ill may shew that we are not humorists, let us try fortune we have had with our Bill, lately sent what strength we can muster up to oppose up to the lords, in having it thrown out in such these great enemies by some other laws; as a heat, without so much as a conference, when a house is on fire, we make use of buc(though whenever they shall consider of it inkets and tubs for casting of water, until the cool blood, they will find there can be no other way to secure the Protestant Religion) we may with some reason be discouraged. But I hope, sir, that, seeing our country have thought us worthy to be their representatives, we shall not be so easily daunted in what so nearly concerns them but be as indefatigable in finding out ways for our preservation, as our enemies are to find out means for our de

great engines can be got. But I would move you to be cautious what you do; for I am afraid that the design of putting you upon finding out expedients, is it not in order to have any thing done that may be effectual against Popery; but in order to have you offer at something that may purchase a disrepute on the house, and give your enemies an advantage to pursue their designs of breaking us, by

« PreviousContinue »