Page images
PDF
EPUB

Llanverras, The King v. 603

Murray v. Harding, ii. 859 Lloyd v. Wooddall, 29

Mylock v. Saladine, 480 -- qui tam v. Williams, ii. 722, 792 Loane v. Casey, ii. 965

NAUNTON, Lessee of, v. Leman, ii.993 Long v. Dennis, 630

Neal, Lessee of, v. Roberts, 476 - Lessee of, v. Lamy, 265

Newby v. Reed, 416 - v. Linch, ii. 740

Newman, Lessee of, v. Newman, 938 Longhead on dem. of Hopkins v. Phelps, - v. Goodman, ij. 1093, 1110 ii. 704

Nicholl v. Nicholl, ii. 1159 Lord o. Cooke, 436

Nicol v. Verelst, ii, 1277 Lovegrove v. Bethell, 668

Nightingale v. Devisme, ii. 684 Lowe v. Jolliffe, 365

- v. Nightingale, ii. 1274 Lowndes v. Horne, ii. 1252

Noden, Lessee of, v. Griffiths, 605 Lucas, Lessee of, v. Fulford, 288

Norris v. Levi, ii. 1188 Luke v. Lloyd, 190

- v. Waldron, ii. 1199 Luke v. Harris, ii. 1261, 1293

Norwich, The Mayor of, v. Berry, 636 St. Luke's Middlesex, The King v. 553

-v. Swann, ii. 1116 - Hospital, The King v. The Oc Nottingham, The King v. 59 cupiers of, 249

Nueys and Galley, The King v. 416 MABER v. Massias, ii, 1072

OATES, Lessee of Markham,v.Cooke, 543 Manby v. Wortley, ii. 1223

Ogilvie v. Foley, ii. 1111 Markham, Lessee of, v. Cooke, 543 Oldfield v. Licet, ii. 1001 Marsden and Others, The King v. 579 Oldham v. Peake, ii. 959 Marsh v. Bower, ii. 851

Oldknow v. Wainwright, 229 Marshall's Case, ii. 912

Olding v. Arundel, 357 Martin, The King v. 634; ii. 790

Onslow v. Horne, ii. 750 v. Podger, ii. 701

Openshawe, The King v. 463 v. Kesterton, ii. 1089

Over-Norton v. Salford, 433, 455 Massen v. Touchet, ii. 706

Oxenden, Lessee of, v. Laurance, ii. 1259 Mash's Case, ii. 805 Mason v. Vere, ii. 1217, 1309

PALLANT v. Roll, ii. 900 Mast v. Goodson, ii. 848

Parker v. Ansell, ii. 920, 963 Maxwell v. Mayre, 271, 364

Parsons, The King v. 392, 401 Mayre v. Coulthard and Goodwin, ii. 1230 -- v. Lloyd, ii. 845 Medhurst v. Waite, 350

Paty, The King v. ii. 721 Melchart v. Halsey, ii. 741

Paul, Lessee of, v. Paul, 255 Methold, Lessee of, v. Noright, 290

Pawley v. Holly, ii. 853 Michael, (St.), Southampton, The King v. Peale v. Watson, ii. 922 ii. 718

Pearson v. Meadon, ii. 903 Miller's Case, 451; ii. 881

Peckham and Clarke, The King v. ii. 1218 Miller v. Taylor, a note relative to, 675. Pemberton, The King v. 230 - The King v. ii. 797

Perkins, Lessee of Vowe, v. Sewell, 654 - v. Seare, ii, 1141

-- v. Kempland, ii. 1106 Milward v. Caffin, ii. 1330

Perrin v. Blake, 672 Mitchell v. Morris, ii. 1179

Phipps, Lessee of, v. Allin, ii. 1041 Mole, Lessee of, v. Thomas, ii. 1043 Pick v. Clarkson, ii. 1318 Molyneaux v. Scott, 376

Pickering v. Watson, ii. 1117 Moncaster v. Watson, 402

Pitt and Mead, The King v. 380
Money and Others v. Leach, 555

Pochin v. Pawley, 670 ·
Montacute (Lord) and Others, The King Poitier v. Croza, 48
V. 60.

Pole v. Jonson, ii. 764
Montefiori v. Montefiori, 363

Poole v. Peate, ü. 1206 Moorhouse v. Wainhouse, 638

Pope v. Vaux, ii. 1060 Moreau's Case, ii. 1205

Portsmouth, The King v. The Overseers of, Morgan and Others, The King v. 397 395 ;. Morris v. Harwood and Pugh, 312, 320 Povey, Lessee of, v. Doe, ii. 892 _ v. Miller, 632

Powel v. Little, 8 - v. Rees, ii. 838

- The King v. ii. 787 Morrison v. Kelly, 385

- v. Milbank, ii. 851 Mortis, The King v. ii. 733

- v. Peach, ii. 1202 Moses v. Macpherlan, 219

Preston v. Merceau, ii. 1249 Motteaux v. Si. Aubin, ii. 1133

Price v. Neale, 390 Moulsdale v. Birchall, ii. 820

Pulteney v. Townson, ii. 1227

Purnell (Dr.), The King v. 37

Say v. Ellis, ii. 955 Pye v. Leigh, ij. 1065

Sayre v. The Earl of Rochford, ii. 1165 - Lessee of, v. Bird, ii. 1301

Scott, The King v. 291, 350 Pyke v. Dowling, ii. 1257

- v. Perry, ii. 758

— v. Shepherd, ii. 892 QUANTOCK v. England, ii. 702

- v. Shearman, ii. 977

Seaford, The King v. The Justices of, 432 RADCLIFFE (Charles), The King v. 3 Selwin v. Selwin, 222, 251 Rafael v. Verelst, ii. 983, 1055, 1067 Seton v. Sinclair and Others, 'ii. 880 Raines v. Nelson, ii. 1181

Sharpe v. Brice, ii. 942 Ramsey v. Macdonald, 30

Shaw, The King v. ii. 789 Rayment, Lessee of, v. Walford, ii. 938 - v. Tunbridge, ii. 1064 Reed v. Harrison, ii. 1218

Shirley v. Collis, ii. 940 Reeve and Others, The King v. 231 Shorter v. Packhurst, 19 Reynolds, The King v. 230

Showler and Others, The King v. 419 Rice o. Shute, ii. 695

Simon v. Mettivier or Motivos, 599 Richards v. Acton, ii. 1220

Simmons r. Shannon, ji. 725 Richardson v. Morriss, ii. 1179

Simpson (Sir Edward), The King v. 456 Ricord v. Bettenham, 563

- v. the Hundred of Ashwarden, Right, Lessee of Basset, v. Thomas, 446 ii. 812 Rispal, The King v. 368

-- v. Stone, ii. 785 Roberts v. Andrews, ii. 720

Smallwood, Lessee of, v. Strother, ii. 706 Robinson v. Bland, 234, 256

Smedley v. Hill, ii. 1105
The King v. 541

Smith v. Scandret, 444
- Lessee of, v. Wharry, ii. 728 - v. Stotesbury, 204
Roche v. Carey, ij. 850

-- v. Fraser, 192 Roe, Lessee of Noden, v. Griffiths, 605 - on demise of Davis v. Saunders, ii. - on demise of Bendall v. Summerset, 736 ii. 692

-- on demise of Ginger v. Barnardis- on demise of Kaye v. Soley, ii. 726 ton, ii. 904

- on demise of Gray v. Gray, ii. 815 -- v. Eyles, ii. 970
- on demise of Lee v. Ellis, ii. 940 --- v. Parker, ii. 1230
-on demise of Callowv. Bolton, ii. 1045 Smollet (Dr.), The King r. 269

- on demise of Thorne v. Lord, ii. 1099 Snowdon v. Thomas, ij. 748 - on demise of Gilman v. Heyhoe, ii. Soulsby v. Hodgson, 463 1114

Sowley v. Jones, ii. 725 - on demise of Bree v. Lees, ii. 1171 Sparrow v. Naylor, îi. 876

on demise of Aistrop v. Aistrop, ii. - 0. Cooper, ii. 1314 1228

Spelman's Case, 19 on demise of Pye v. Bird, ii. 1301 Spong v. Hog, ii. 802 Rogers v. Holled, ii. 1039

Spraggs, The King v. 209 Rolfe, Lessee of, v. Harwood, ü. 937 Spriggins, The King v. 2 Rolls v. Barnes, 65

Stafford, Earl of, v. The Bishop of Norwich, Ross v. Bradshaw, 312

Cambridge University, and Baker, ii.881 Rowe v. Hasland, 404

Stationers' Company v. Carnan, ii. 1004 Rowning v. Goodchild, ii. 906

Stean v. Holmes, ii. 754 Rudge, The King v. 432

Stephen v. Coster and Others, 413, 423 Ruffle v. Hitchacock, ii. 1097

Stevens v. Evans and Others, 284

Stevenson v. Snow, 315, 318 ST. DEVEREUX v. Much-Dew-Church,

Lessee of, v. Noright, ii. 746 367

v. Hardie, ïi. 872 St. George's, Middlesex, The King v. The Stiles on demise of Rayment v. Walford, Overseers of, ii, 694

ii. 938 St. John v. The Bishop of Winton and Hill, Stock v. Eagle, ii. 1052 ii. 930

Strithorst v. Græhme, ii. 723 St. Saviour's, Churchwardens of, v. Smith, Strong v. Teatt, 200 351

Stuart v. Tucker, ii. 1137 Salomon v. Gordon and Berrie, ii. 813 Sulston v. Norton, 317 Sanderson v. Baker and Martin, ii. 832 Sutton v. Bishop, 665 Santler v. Heard, ii. 1031

v. Fenn, ii. 847 Satterthwaite, Less.of, v. Satterthwaite, 519 Swann v. Broome, 496, 526 Saunders and Others v. Lowe, ii, 1014 Swift, Lessee of Neale, v. Roberts, 476 Savage qui tam v. Smith, ii. 1101

Symonds v. Parminter, 20

TALBOT v. Linfield, 450

West Riding of Yorkshire, the King v. ii. 685 Tasker, Lessee of, v. Burr, 596

Weyhill, The King v. 206 Taunton Market, the Clerk to the Trustees Wharfs, The Case of the London, 581 of, v. Kimberley, ij. 1120

Wharton v. Gresham, ii. 1083 Tavistock, The King v. 635

Wheatley, The King v. 273 Thorne, Lessee of, v. Lord, ii. 1099 Wheeler, The King v. 311 Thrustout on demise of Levick v. Coppin,

-- v. Cooper, 603 ii. 801

Whitehead and the Bishop of Linclon v. - on demise of Barnes v. Craster, Wolferstan, 490 ii. 826

Whitmore, The King v. 37 on demise of Gower v. Cun Whitten and Wife v. Fuller, ii. 902 ningham, ii, 1046

Wigan, The King v. The Inhabitants of, 47 Timbrell v. Mills, 205

The King v. The In-Burgesses of, Timmins v. Rowlison, 533

468 Timson and Another v. Noden, ii. 963 Wightwick, Lessee of, v. Truby, ii. 944 Tonson v. Collins, 301, 321

Willet v. Atherton, 35 Torriano v. Legge, 420

Williams v. Vaughan, 28 Trinity v. St. Peter's, Dorchester, 443 - The King v. 93 Triquet v. Bath, 471

---, Lessee of Johnson, v. Keen and Trott v. Welsh and Swann, 392

Morgan, 197 Tyssen v. Clarke, ii. 891, 941

Wills v. Palmer, ii. 687 Tyte v. Steventon, ii. 1298

Wilson v. Sewell, Master of the Rolls, 617

v. Smith, 507 VANDEVALD, The King v. 212

Wiltshire, The King v. The Justices of, 467 Vane (Lord), The King v. 18

Wingfield, The King v. 602 Varley, The King v. ii. 682

Winn v. White, ii. 840 Vowe, Lessee of, v. Sewell, 654

Winter v. Trimmer, 395

Winterborne, The King v. 452 UPPOM v. Sumner, ii. 1251, 1294 Witney, The King o. The Inhabitants of,

· ï. 709 WADDINGTON, Lessee of, v. Thrustout, Wood's Case, ii. 745 ï. 800

Wood qui tam v. Ellis, ii. 1154 Wade v. Rogers, ii. 780

- qui tam v. Johnson, ii. 1157 Waldron v. Norris, ii. 769

- qui tam v. Caffin, ibid. Walker u. Parkins, Administrator, 517

- v. Chessall, ii. 1254 - v. Giblett, ii. 811

Wooden v. Boyntun, 50 - v. Carter, ii. 816

Woolmer v. Muilman, 427 Walkhouse v. Darwent and Larwood, 19 Woolston v. Woolston, 281 Wallen qui tam v. Holton, 233

Wright, Assignee of Scott, v. Campbell, 628 Walpole St. Peter's, The King v. 669

- v. Page, ii. 837 Walter v. Stuart, ii. 918

-, Lessee of, v. Wright, ii. 889 Waraker v. Gascoyne, ii. 1297

- v. Russell, ii. 923, 934 Ward, The King v. 386

- on demise of Allingham v. Dow— v. Gansell, ii. 735

ley, ü. 1185 - Lessee of, v. Badtitle, ü. 763 Wyndham v. Chetwynd, 95 Warman's Case, ii. 1204 Watkins v. Heydon, ii. 762

YATES v. Carlisle and Others, 270, 291 Watson v. Cox, ii. 1065

Young v. Lynch, 27 Webb, The King v. 19, 460

v. Hockley, ii. 839 Wellington u. Wellington, 645

Yeaw v. Holland, ii. 717
Wells v. Watling, ii. 1233
West v. Eyles, i. 1059

ZINCK v. Walker, ii. 1154
Weston v. Coulson, 506

Zouch, Lessee of Abbot, v. Parsons, 575

OF

CA S E s.

MICH. TERM,-20 Geo. II. 1746.-KING'S BENCH.

in the con time must bel and Stracey of this caskot having

HANKEY v. TROTMAN. M OTION for a new trial. Plaintiff was a banker; had a No new trial bill on defendant; for which the defendant gave him a bill on where the ver

dict is neither another banker, at twelve at noon, who stopped payment before against evidence the next morning. The question was, Whether plaintiff or nor law. defendant should stand to the loss; or whether there was any

No time prelaches in the plaintiff, who got the bill marked for acceptance for the receipt the same night. On the trial, the jury found a verdict for the of bills of exdefendant.

change. Sir John Strange, Sir R. Lloyd, and Mr. Ford, argued for the plaintiff, that he endeavoured to receive the bill as soon as in the common course of business it used to be received ; and that some time must be allowed for the circulating paper credit.

Mr. Hume Campbell and Stracey, contra, laid it down that a trading jury was the best judge of this case, and had not gone against law in this verdict, the law not having prescribed any time for receiving bills; and that the Court was not to interpose, unless the jury was manifestly wrong.

Per Cur'. Lee, C. J.-I was of opinion for the plaintiff at the trial, though there was variety of evidence; but doubt whether the verdict can be set aside, as it is a question of * fact, whether there was convenient time allowed for receiving [ 2 ] the money.

WRIGHT, J.-The jury is the proper judge of circumstances and facts. But the question here is, Whether the plaintiff had any time at all. Some time must be allowed: Therefore I doubt whether the verdict is not against evidence, imputing laches to the plaintiff where there was none.

DENISON, J.-Both juries and Judges have been of different sentiments as to this point. The question is, Whether the VOL I.

« PreviousContinue »