Page images
PDF
EPUB

are less resistant than the one taken as an example, the anthrax spores, and that we are not called upon every time to remove germs from our instruments of such stubborn resistance as these, still we should hold fast to the conditions we have named for proving the worth of our disinfection, and can not therefore accept a 5% sol. of carbolic acid as a sufficient means. Stronger solutions may scarcely be resorted to in practice on account of difficulty of dissolving, independent of the fact that cost is of no small importance.

From the group of fluid, chemically active disinfectants, we turn to the procedure of disinfection by heat. Yet this does not possess the conditions advanced as necessary for our purpose. Dry heat as Kimmell recommends it, is not sufficient, for according to Koch's examination, the anthrax spores are killed only after three hours exposure to a heat of 140°C. and the physician cannot wait so long for the disinfection of his instruments, therefore Ziegenspeck discards this and recommends that steel instruments be brought to a red heat. Though this form of dry heat is so efficacious, especially is such an important shortening of time, yet this great feature is against its use, that it dulls the instruments and in a short time makes them worthless. Besides only metalic instruments and metalic portions of compound instruments will stand a flame heat, which makes this plan also unfit for the general disinfection of instruments.

Another form of heat disfection is that by moist heat, which may be brought into use in two separate forms; first as steam and second as direct

1. Kimmell, "Centralblatt Turchirurgie," 1887, No. 17, "How shall the Physician Disinfect His Hands?"

moist heat in the water bath. The first, which Kimmell has also recommended, is, according to former experiments, the most energetic of all means of disinfection; it accomplishes the destruction of anthrax spores in a few minutes and must therefore be recognized by us as first in value. Its worth as a disinfectant of instruments is limited, from the circumstance that this method requires a particular encircling apparatus, which makes it difficult, if not impossible, of application by the practicing physician. The physician, who must be in position to disinfect his instruments at the dwelling of a patient, cannot carry about with him a steam sterilizing apparatus. Consequently there remains to us only the method of disinfecting by moist heat, i. e., cooking instruments, and it is this which as we shall see, answers all demands for a complete and sure disinfectant, as well as an easy and practicable accomplishment.

This method has already been much recommended, and often employed in clinics, yet in literature we find no definite information as to how long the cooking must be continued to result in complete disinfection. In the past three years, while assistant to Prof. Gluck, I saw this method of disinfection of instruments in practice, with the best results. After every operation the instruments were cleaned and polished, carefully rubbed over with fat, then this removed by rubbing with turpentine or ether, when they were cooked in quite a weak solution of soda. Another cooking of half an hour or longer was performed before, and up to the time of, the next operation. Now if it were necessary for a complete disinfection to boil instruments so long a

time, as Koch says, two hours, then this procedure must also be relegated to the useless for the practicing physician. In truth this is not the case and as my experiments directed especially to this point will show, a considerable lessening of this time may be made.

It must be borne in mind, that every portion of the instrument must receive the action of the most heat and that air pent up in holes, canals, eyes, etc., must be forced out. In water we possess a body, says Soyka 1 in a work of recent appearance, which has the properties, of conducting heat 27 times more rapidly than air, and of direct action on specific organisms in that it causes a swelling and softening of the cell walls and so promotes action of the disinfectant. These properties of water are brought into play and it meets the requirement of filling all unevennesses in the instruments. In the majority of instruments water finds access of itself to canals, etc., and it is sufficient to place these in a simple vessel filled with hot water. When this does not transpire, as in syringes, it is recommended to fill them with water before placing in the bath.

Now comes the question, how long a cooking is necessary? From experiments on our classical test spores, the anthrax, we find that they are killed by boiling water, at a temperature of 100°C. in two minutes. I thought, therefore that a somewhat longer action, say five minutes, would be required for such inaccessable places as holes, eyes, canals, etc., of instruments. Through special experiments I convinced myself that anthrax spores on silk threads brought into these same inaccessable places were killed by a five minutes cooking provided the article be a good conductor of 1. Soyka, To the Theory and Practice of Disinfection, "Berliner Klinische Medicinische Wochenschrift" 1888, No. 15, 16.

[blocks in formation]

We have taken it for granted that during the entire time of cooking the temperature is at 100°C. in the water bath, and the question now arises how is this to be reached?

Koch specifies that in an open water bath the temperature is not alike in all places. Careful measurement shows that the average temperature is 99°C., in the middle of the upper layer only 98.7°--98.8°C. and on the circumference about a tenth lower. If the heat supply is smaller, then the middle of the mass of water at a maximum, is 97.7°C., while the upper layer shows a temperature of only 97°C. I can fully endorse this, but also give the assurance, that if access of cold air is prevented, and the formed steam allowed to escape through only a small opening, a temperature of 100°C. may be reached and maintained in all layers of the water. So it is simply necessary to have a cover, to the water bath for disinfecting.

Now by putting together what we have found out we arrive at the following: That the very resistant infective germs, anthrax spores, that adhere to our instruments, may be destroyed with certainty, by immersion in a well closed water bath for five minutes, with the temperature held at 100°C. i. e. just the heat of boiling water, care only being taken that the depressions, etc., are filled with the fluid.

Our problem now becomes the adaptability for the conditions arising in practice, of what we have as yet proved for the anthrax spores only. The circumstances before us in practice are different from those already considered, in that here the organisms to be destroyed by disinfection are suspended in substances, e. g., pus, blood, etc., which coagulate by the action of higher degrees of heat, so that the micro-organisms are surrounded by an envelope, resistant to the permeation of heat. This factor naturally required attention in later experiments.

So far as the organism itself is concerned we have until now made experiments with a pure culture only, although of a very resistant organism, while in practice the infected substance may be of a most varied mixture, partly composed of spores of equal resistance to anthrax and partly of less resistant bacteria. It must then be primarily shown that our method is capable of killing pus bacteria which may be sticking to instruments. If we prove that anthrax spores, certainly the most resistant of all pathogenic spores, are destroyed, notwithstanding the increased difficulties of practice, then we have the assurance that we are freed from all less resistant organisms, such as those of diphtheria, tubercle, etc.

Next the question should be answered, if instruments soiled with pus bacteria from pure cultures, are cleansed from them by the method given? It is known that these organisms from a pure culture are destroyed in five minutes by boiling water. In our cases now, parts of instruments, little pieces of metals of all sorts, wood, bone, ivory, glass, etc., were sterilized in a dry chamber, and then smeared with pure culture of pus

bacteria, Staphylokokkus Pyogen, Aureus and Albus, Erysipel and Bacteria Pyocyaneus. Thereupon I either layed them directly into the boiling water or I allowed the smeared substances to dry on and then tried the disinfecting experiment. The pieces were brought out of the water bath with sterilized pinchers and transferred to bouillion or gelatine tubes and then placed in a brew oven held at a temperature of 37°C. Notwithsanding some difficulties which had to be overcome, arising from the presence of iron salts, these experiments proved that our method maintained itself.

It is by no means pure culture of known bacteria that we have to deal with in practice, but pus itself, foul and decomposing blood, wound secretion and such that soil the knife and other instruments, and make them a well of ever new infection, carries the destructive material from wound to wound, and therefore demands pressingly, a certain manner for their destruction. Our method then, if it accomplish its purpose, must be capable of disinfecting pus, i. e., to undoubtedly kill all infectious organisms in it. Previously it was by no means proved and certain that this method would do so, for pus as we have already remarked is a substance rich in albumen, which under the influence of higher degrees of heat coagulates and forms firm particles which surround some of the organisms with a mantle that must resist and prolong the entrance of the required temperature. The following experiment will show if in spite of this, boiling water is sufficient to kill the contained bacteria in five minutes. A moderately wide test tube was filled with pus and placed in a water bath so that the mouth reached just

to

above its surface prevent access of water and dilution of the pus. Then the water bath was covered over and the temperature maintained at 100°C. for five minutes. From pus treated in this manner,different amounts, from a particle to 2 c. c., were used to inoculate nourishing gelatine and examined by the plate method. It showed that in every case the pus bacteria were destroyed. In another case anthrax spores were added to fresh pus and treated in the same manner, when the plates showed that the anthrax as well as the pus spores were killed by their five minutes boil.

One might object that the larger amount of the pus, covering the instruments, is disseminated through the entire amount, and that the dilution was not sufficiently disinfected, so that in any layer of water there might be organisms

to act anew as sources of infection for the instruments. The following shows that in all layers the diluted pus was alike disinfected. One hundred c. c. of pus were mixed with 1 liters of water, from this mixture a test plate was made, the remainder boiled five minutes at 100°C. and then gelatine and agar-agar plates inoculated under antiseptic precautions. The result was that on the test plate a large number of germ colonies developed, while on the other plates inoculated from the boiled mixture, scarcely any, some plates remaining entirely sterile,others developed a few colonies evidently from germs that had settled on the plates from the air, while others contained besides these colonies a few spores which were boiled for two hours without killing them, but they were afterwards found to be perfectly harmless by inoculating

animals with them. It is questionable if these resistant organisms were primarily in the pus or whether they were from unclean articles used in bringing it. The necessities of our case has to do only with the killing of infectious germs, and

we have shown that our measures are sufficient to destroy the most resistant of all such, the anthrax spores, and so we consider our problem in this direction answered. That there are bacteria that far exceed the anthrax spores in resistance is well known, and we have seen from recent works in what an extraordinary degree this may appear. But these organisms belong to the nonpathogenic and harmless and as Esmarch has recently shown, do not necessitate a change in our methods. We may therefore hold to our conclusion given above and proved; that five minutes boiling is undoubtedly sufficient. It has been shown that five minutes cooking kills with certainty pus bacteria from pure cultures applied to instruments, and above all, that it destroys pus germs as well as anthrax, mixed in the dried as well as the fresh pus. Now in conclusion, it must be proved if it does the same for pus adhering directly to instruments.

For various reasons it was necessary to scratch particles of coagulated pus from the instruments after their cooking, which was accomplished with a sterilized knife and gelatine plates could be inoculated with these particles. Pus was then mixed with a great quantity of bouillion cultures of the known pus bacteria, and various complicated instruments, as catheters, forceps, toothed pinchers, scissors, etc., were so thor

oughly coated with this mixture as could scarcely happen in practice (a hypodromic was entirely filled), then all were placed in turn in the covered water bath for five minutes at a temperature of 100°C. and it was so arrainged that after each experiment was finished with fluid pus, one with dried pus was inaugurated. After their boiling, the instruments were taken out under proper precautions, cooled off and particles scraped from them as described, for plate cultures. Nourishing fluid was inoculated with several drops from the boiled contents of the syringe and then the piston was withdrawn and particles from its upper surface and sides used for another plate, a drop of pus was taken from the eye of the catheter. The result was that notwithstanding the immense number of organisms primarily present after five minutes cooking of the instruments there were no more pus bacteria, not even in those cases where individual forms had been added in especially large quantities.

In conclusion we have the proof stone of all our measures of disinfection, the mixture of anthrax spores in pus, smearing of instruments with it and then treating as written above. After a cooking of five minutes duration the anthrax spores were destroyed.

Thus our method is capable of freeing with absolute certainty instruments, in the highest degree unclean, from adhering infectious organisms and in practice may fulfill its purpose much better, as here before the disinfection proper, a mechanical cleaning of the instruments will be made by brushing, syringing out, polishing, etc.

In a large series of cases I have convinced myself of the certainty of the specified proceedings. After the most

varied operations, on tuberculous gland abscesses, decomposed phlegmon of forearm, mastitis, periproctitic abscess, etc., whereby the instruments came in contact with pus in the most infectious manner, I have disinfected them in the manner described and thereafter examined them for organisms. Complicated instruments were proved with especial minuteness, and infected in the most inconvenient places, then I picked particles from these for examination and inoculation. The results were always the same, an entire sterilization of the instruments.

The supposition that cutting instruments loose their edge by cooking is not substantiated, for a freshly honed microtome knife was found by a competent instrument maker to have lost none of its properties and sections were cut with it of the same thinness as be fore its cooking. Also my own instruments which were cooked often enough during my experiments have lost none of their usefulness, and have taken no harm either in the points of union or otherwise.

The easiest and most reasonable method of disinfecting, is from my experiments, the following: The instruments are placed immediately after operation in cold water, pus, etc., washed from their surfaces, syringes and canulas syringed out and then filled with should be dried with a sterilized cloth. water, after they are taken out they Then they are cooked in a closed vessel for five minutes at a of temperature 100°C. their next using they are

Before cooked

again five minutes, taken out, allowed

to cool and used without the assistance of a disinfectant fluid.

« PreviousContinue »