The Theory of the Divine Right of Kings |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 54
Page 23
... Ibid . 1. 497 , 8. " The king is conceived to hold his lands by a strictly hereditary right . Between his lands and the kingship it would be hard to distinguish .... The descent of the Crown was not so unique a phenomenon then as it is ...
... Ibid . 1. 497 , 8. " The king is conceived to hold his lands by a strictly hereditary right . Between his lands and the kingship it would be hard to distinguish .... The descent of the Crown was not so unique a phenomenon then as it is ...
Page 24
... evidence that the theory of re- presentative primogeniture was not yet accepted . 1 Pollock and Maitland , History of English Law , 11. 260 sqq . 2 Ibid . 1. 505 . On the other hand , this case , until the 24 EARLY IDEAS OF KINGSHIP .
... evidence that the theory of re- presentative primogeniture was not yet accepted . 1 Pollock and Maitland , History of English Law , 11. 260 sqq . 2 Ibid . 1. 505 . On the other hand , this case , until the 24 EARLY IDEAS OF KINGSHIP .
Page 31
... in Manorial Courts ; also History of English Law , I. 559 . 2 Ibid . 1. 160 , 1 . 3 See Maine , Early History of Institutions , Lectures XII , XIII . Lawyers ascribe almost do not as sove- reign . If EARLY IDEAS OF KINGSHIP . 31.
... in Manorial Courts ; also History of English Law , I. 559 . 2 Ibid . 1. 160 , 1 . 3 See Maine , Early History of Institutions , Lectures XII , XIII . Lawyers ascribe almost do not as sove- reign . If EARLY IDEAS OF KINGSHIP . 31.
Page 34
... Ibid . f . 34 . 5 Ibid . f . 107 . 7 Ibid . ff . 368 b and 389 b . " " 2 Ibid . ff . 5b , 6 , 369 . 4 Ibid . f . 55 b , 412 . 6 Ibid . f . 290 b . 8 Britton , 1. 1 . 9 Ibid . 1. 221. " Rois aussi ne porrount rien aliener les dreitz de ...
... Ibid . f . 34 . 5 Ibid . f . 107 . 7 Ibid . ff . 368 b and 389 b . " " 2 Ibid . ff . 5b , 6 , 369 . 4 Ibid . f . 55 b , 412 . 6 Ibid . f . 290 b . 8 Britton , 1. 1 . 9 Ibid . 1. 221. " Rois aussi ne porrount rien aliener les dreitz de ...
Page 48
... Ibid . Dist . xXCVI . c . 11 , " Si Imperator Catholicus est , filius non praesul ecclesiae . " 3 Ibid . c . 13 . 4 Decret . Greg . Lib . I. Tit . vI . c . 34 . 5 lbid . Tit . XXXIII . c . 6. There is a delightful explanation of ...
... Ibid . Dist . xXCVI . c . 11 , " Si Imperator Catholicus est , filius non praesul ecclesiae . " 3 Ibid . c . 13 . 4 Decret . Greg . Lib . I. Tit . vI . c . 34 . 5 lbid . Tit . XXXIII . c . 6. There is a delightful explanation of ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
admitted allegiance argument assert believers Bracton Christian Church civil clergy conscience constitution controversy Crown declares Defensor Pacis deposing Divine Right doctrine duty ecclesiastical Emperor Empire England English fact favour Filmer form of government France French God's Goldast heir Henry Henry VIII hereditary right History Hobbes Holy Roman Empire Ibid James Jesuits Julian the Apostate kingdom kingship Locke magistrate ment merely modern non-resistance notion obey Ockham opponents original compact Papacy Papal claims Papalist Parliament Passive Obedience political theory Pope popular rights position Potestate Presbyterian primogeniture prince principle realm regarded religion religious resistance Richard Richard II Right of Kings Roman royal royalist Salic law sanction Scripture secular governments sentiment Sermon seventeenth century shew shewn sove spiritual Statutes succession supporters supremacy supreme temporal theology theory of Divine theory of sovereignty tion treatise true truth utilitarian VIII Vindiciae Vindiciae contra Tyrannos Whig William of Ockham writers Wycliffe
Popular passages
Page 227 - And it appears in our books, that in many cases, the common law will control acts of parliament, and sometimes adjudge them to be utterly void ; for when an act of parliament is against common right and reason, or repugnant, or impossible to be performed, the common law will control it, and adjudge such act to be void ; and therefore in 8 E 330 ab Thomas Tregor's case on the statutes of W.
Page 48 - See, I have this day set thee over the nations and over the kingdoms, to root out, and to pull down, and to destroy, and to throw down, to build, and to plant.
Page 143 - I, AB, do declare that it is not lawful, upon any pretence whatsoever, to take arms against the King ; and that I do abhor that traitorous position of taking arms by his authority against his person, or against those that are commis•sioned by him...
Page 140 - The most high and sacred order of kings is of divine right, being the ordinance of God himself, founded in the prime laws of nature, and clearly established by express texts both of the Old and New Testaments.
Page 270 - England, the Imperial Crown of the realm of England, and of all the kingdoms, dominions, and rights belonging to the same, did by inherent birthright and lawful and undoubted succession descend and come to your most excellent Majesty, as being lineally, justly, and lawfully next and sole heir of the blood royal of this realm...
Page 269 - ... is, and in very deed and of most mere right ought to be, by the laws of God, and the laws and statutes of this realm, our most...
Page 8 - This matter is by the decree of the watchers, and the demand by the word of the holy ones: to the intent that the living may know that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will, and setteth up over it the basest of men.
Page 8 - Jesus answered, Thou couldest have no power at all against me, except it were given thee from above: therefore he that delivered me unto thee hath the greater sin.
Page 54 - Thou couldest have no power at all against me, unless it were given thee from above," prove at once that the Pope has no universal sovereignty and that secular government is of Divine appointment.
Page 6 - We will still believe and maintain that our kings derive not their title from the people but from God; that to Him only they are accountable; that it belongs not to subjects, either to create or censure, but to honor and obey their sovereign, who comes to be so by a fundamental hereditary right of succession, which no religion, no law, no fault or forfeiture can alter or diminish [quoted from "The Divine Right of Kings,