Reports of Cases Heard and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Volume 22; Volume 29Banks & Bros., 1881 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page iii
... Second Department . HON . NOAH H. DAVIS , P. J. 66 JOHN R. BRADY , 66 GEORGE C. BARRETT , * HON . JOSEPH F. BARNARD , P . J. JASPER W. GILBERT , JACKSON 0. DYKMAN . Third Department . Fourth Department . HON . WM . L. LEARNED , P. J. ...
... Second Department . HON . NOAH H. DAVIS , P. J. 66 JOHN R. BRADY , 66 GEORGE C. BARRETT , * HON . JOSEPH F. BARNARD , P . J. JASPER W. GILBERT , JACKSON 0. DYKMAN . Third Department . Fourth Department . HON . WM . L. LEARNED , P. J. ...
Page 1
Marcus Tullius Hun. Cases DETERMINED IN THE SECOND DEPARTMENT , AT GENERAL TERM , September , 1880 . THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel . JOHN W. FLAHERTY AND GEORGE C ... SECOND DEPARTMENT , SEPTEMBER TERM , 1880 . the counsel.
Marcus Tullius Hun. Cases DETERMINED IN THE SECOND DEPARTMENT , AT GENERAL TERM , September , 1880 . THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel . JOHN W. FLAHERTY AND GEORGE C ... SECOND DEPARTMENT , SEPTEMBER TERM , 1880 . the counsel.
Page 2
... Another thing . Are you aware that the juror , Wilmer , is a chum of the Bennetts , sons of George C. , with whom he has been in the habit of ... SECOND DEPARTMENT , SEPTEMBER TERM , 1880 . The writer 2 PEOPLE ex rel . FLAHERTY v . NEILSON .
... Another thing . Are you aware that the juror , Wilmer , is a chum of the Bennetts , sons of George C. , with whom he has been in the habit of ... SECOND DEPARTMENT , SEPTEMBER TERM , 1880 . The writer 2 PEOPLE ex rel . FLAHERTY v . NEILSON .
Page 5
... another court . The writ of error is , therefore , properly in this court . Upon the merits I think this judgment should be reversed for ... SECOND DEPARTMENT , SEPTEMBER TERM , 1880 . GILBERT , PEOPLE ex rel . FLAHERTY v . NEILSON .
... another court . The writ of error is , therefore , properly in this court . Upon the merits I think this judgment should be reversed for ... SECOND DEPARTMENT , SEPTEMBER TERM , 1880 . GILBERT , PEOPLE ex rel . FLAHERTY v . NEILSON .
Page 6
Marcus Tullius Hun. SECOND DEPARTMENT , SEPTEMBER TERM , 1880 . GILBERT , J. , concurred . Present - BARNARD , P. J. ... SECOND DEPARTMENT , SEPTEMBER TERM , 1880 . the County 6 SEGELKEN v . MEYER .
Marcus Tullius Hun. SECOND DEPARTMENT , SEPTEMBER TERM , 1880 . GILBERT , J. , concurred . Present - BARNARD , P. J. ... SECOND DEPARTMENT , SEPTEMBER TERM , 1880 . the County 6 SEGELKEN v . MEYER .
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abide event action was brought affidavit agreement alleged amount APPELLANT assessment assignment attorney Bank Barb bond and mortgage cause of action City of Elmira Civil Procedure claim commenced complaint concurred costs to abide creditors damages deceased deed defendant defendant's demurrer DYKMAN entitled evidence ex rel execution executor fact fendant foreclosure FOURTH DEPARTMENT GILBERT Hannah Carpenter held IMPLEADED interest issued John Judgment affirmed judgment in favor jury justice Kings county land letters testamentary liable Matter ment mortgage motion NOVEMBER TERM OCTOBER TERM Opinion PER CURIAM Order affirmed order denying Order reversed paid party payment person plaintiff possession premises proceedings purchaser question railroad real estate received recover referee RESPONDENT SECOND DEPARTMENT SEPTEMBER TERM Smith Special Term statute testator therein thereof thereto THIRD DEPARTMENT tion town trustees usury vacated verdict Wend York YORK ex rel
Popular passages
Page 572 - From the commencement of an action or special proceeding, or the service of an answer containing a counterclaim, the attorney who appears for a party has a lien upon his client's cause of action, claim or counterclaim, which attaches to a verdict, report, decision, judgment or final order In his client's favor and the proceeds thereof in whosoever hands they may come; and the lien cannot be affected by any settlement between the parties before or after Judgment or final order.
Page 340 - Where it appears, from the complaint, that the plaintiff demands, and is entitled to a judgment against the defendant, restraining the commission or continuance of an act, the commission or continuance of which, during the pendency of the action, would produce injury to the plaintiff, an injunction order may be granted to restrain it.
Page 322 - An unconditional promise in writing to accept a bill before it is drawn is deemed an actual acceptance in favor of every person who, upon the faith thereof, receives the bill for value.
Page 242 - ... according to our best information; and that, with the exception of those cases in which the value of the said real estate has been changed by reason of proof produced before us...
Page 201 - No private or local bill, which may be passed by the Legislature, shall embrace more than one subject, and that shall be expressed in the title.
Page 340 - Where it appears, by affidavit, that the defendant, during the pendency of the action, is doing, or procuring, or suffering to be done, or threatens, or is about to do, or to procure, or suffer to be done, an act, in violation of the plaintiff's rights, respecting the subject of the action, and tending to render the judgment ineffectual, an injunction order may be granted to restrain him therefrom.
Page 393 - Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, made upon the minutes of the justice before whom the action was tried.
Page 700 - ... to procure a judgment, directing a conveyance of real property ; and every other action to recover, or to procure a judgment, establishing, determining, defining, forfeiting, annulling, or otherwise affecting, an estate, right, title, lien, or other interest, in real property, or a chattel real.
Page 526 - The principle derived from that source is very plain and simple. It requires equal justice to all. But the equality which is to be observed in relation to the public and to every individual consists in the restricted right to charge, in each particular case of service, a reasonable compensation, and no more. If the carrier confines himself to this, no wrong can be done, and no cause afforded for complaint.
Page 335 - But if the owner intrusts to another, not merely the possession of the property, but also written evidence, over his own signature, of title thereto, and of an unconditional power of disposition over it, the case is vastly different. There can be no occasion for the delivery of such documents, unless it is intended that they shall be used, either at the pleasure of the depositary, or under contingencies to arise. If the conditions...