Page images
PDF
EPUB

505
527

CATTLE GUAR S-- Railways to maintain; L. S.

& M. S. R’y Co. vs. Sharp et al. Ohio.........

CHANGE OF BASE....

CHARGE TO JURY-Coniments of judge; when

not subject to execution ; Sindran vs. Peo-

ple. N. Y...

CHATTEL MORTGAGE-

Passes to assignee; Inghain Bros. vs. Linde-

mann, assignee. Onio....

Affidavit on indemnity ; inust show taken in

good faith; Nesbit vs. Worts et al. Ohio...

CHECKS-

As evidence; in exchango of; to so prove

and disprove payment; Albrecht vs. Ben-

der. Pa......

Holder of, need not indorse; Molurdy vs.

Society for Savings. CuyalogCo. C. P.

Ohio..

CHURCH DISCIPLINE-Member of, with vocal

peculiarities as subject of; State vs. Link-

haw. N. (......

CINCINNATI HOUSE OF REFUGE--Comunit-

ment to, not invalid for want of notice to

father; House of Refuge vs. Patrick H.

Ryan. Ohio........

UITY COUNCIL-Election of clerk ; Ohio er rel.

vs. Green. Ohio.......

CIVIL RIGHTS-Charge of Judge Baxter; United

States vs. John M. Bunton. U.S.......

COHABITATION-As proof of marriage; Badger

vs. Badger. N. Y

COMITY BETWEEN STATYS-Protecting re-

ceiver of another state against attachments;

Merchant's Nat'l Bank vs. M:Lood, re.

ceiver. Ohio....

COMMERCIAL LAW-Draft in payment of life

insurance premium ; Pendletoni vs. Knicker-

hocker Life Ins, ('0. U. S......

COMMISSIONER'S SALE-When voidable; inili-

tary exemption ; Sked vs. Sedgley et al. Ohio

COMMON LAW-Married woman's authority to

order goods not changed by statute; Flynn

Vs. Messenger. Minn ........

COMMON SCHOOLS-

Districts not corporations ; State ex' rel. vs.

Powers et al. Ohio.........

Laws regulating, uniform throughout the

State.....

COMUNICATED

CONSEALED WEAPONS.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND FACT-To be

stated by the Court; Trustees of Oxford Tp.

vs, Columbia et al. Ohio.

CONDITION—Land conveyed to Board of Educa-

tion its successors and assigns, a fee; Taylor

vs. Buford.

Ohio................

CONSIDERATION-Promise to pay debt after re-

lease of under seal, void and without; Inger-

soll vs. Martin. Md......
CONSPIRACY.
CONSTABLE-Justice of Peace no jurisdiction on

Bond of; Hornbuckle vs. State. Ohio.........

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-

Act April 20. 1874, giving a penalty for over-

charge by railroad company; C. S. & C. R.

R. Vs. Cook. Ohio.......

Art to revise general statutes of State ; she

vs. State. Obio.....
Act releasing sureties of public officer ; State

er rel. vs. School Board. Ohio.......

Common school districts not corporations

within meaning of; State ex rel. v . Powers.

Ohio.......

Depends on operation not fornı; State vs.

Hipp. Ohio.....

“ Uniform rule" in taxation construed ;

Wagner, treasurer, vs. Loomis et al. Ohio..

Dividing turnpikes into classes, not in con-

Alict with Art. II, Sec. 36 of; State of Ohio

ex rel. vs. Turnpike (o. Ohio....

CONTEMPT OF COURT-Where injunction al-

lowed, no undertaking given, punishment

for not, it'thorized, in not regarding injunc-

tion; Diehl vs. Friester. Ohio........

CONTINGENCY-Niles vs. Gray (12 O.S. 320) fol.

CONTINUANCE_When a matter of discretion in

bomicide; Akin vs. State. Tex.....

141

“CONTINUOUSLY”-Two parallel and compet-

ing railroads cannot be connected for car-

riage of freight, &c.; State is. Vanderbilt.

Ohio.....

386

CONTRACT-

A mechanic by, precluded from filing lien

as against other creditors; West, trustee,

vs, Klot... Ohio..........

291

Based upon uarantees of facts, otherwise

cannot be enforced; ('onn. Mutual Fire

Ins. ('0. vs. Hunizinger, Assignee. P'a...... 46

Damages for breach of; Schweider vs. Lang.

Minni

612

Damages for breach, cannot be recovered for

expected protiis; Allis vs. McLean et al.

Mich..

024

Failure of subject matter; Scioto Fire Brick
('. vs. Pond. Ohio........

479
Failure to perforın on part of street contrac-
tor; Stone vs. Viele. Ohio........

587

Not required by statute to be reduced to

writing, and is valid though one sign and

others agree verbally; Bacon vs. Daniel.

Ohio......

237

Not ultra vires, when made by railroad for

fixed future period of time; ('leveland and

Mahoning R. R. Co. vs. Himrod Furnace

(v. Ohio.......

219

Of county, though irregular, titer perform-

ance of, binds railroad company contract-

ing; Athens vs. B. S. & L. R. R. ('o. Ohio.. 165

Defendant liable for services to another by

physician, who leaves him at office for

Treatment; Perry vs. Puisey. Ky ........... ISO
Policy of Life Insurance as to insured; Roly-
inson vs. Duvall. Ky .........

77
Refusal to deliver ore as per; contractor ab.

solved from demand; Swist Iron and Stecl
Co. Vs. Dewey Vance ('o. Ohio........

193
Right of action against railroad for non-im-

provement of street under, when aceruing;

C. & S. R. R. ('0. vs. ('arthage. Ohio......... 122
Right to recover money contributed to force

fictitious values; Raymond vs. Leavitt.

Mich......

92

To contribute to religious society, inade on

Sunday, valid; Dale, trustee, vs. Knapp.

Penn

170

Under statute to take shares in insurance

company must be in writing; Faming vs.
Hibernia Ins. ('o. Obio......

236

Univeral usage as to delivery ; Swist's Iron

and Steel Works vs. Dewey Vance & Co. O. 193

Less than face of note in full satisfaction ;

Sch weider vs. Lang. Minn).......

Vendee, personal property, refusing to ac-

cept under; Cullen et al. vs. Bimm et al.

Ohio...

180

Void as against public policy ; Raymond is.

Leavitt. Mich.

92

CONTRACTS BY CORRESPONDENCE.

632

CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE BY PERSONS

WITH DEFECTIVE SENSES

51

('OPYRIGHT..

617

CORPORATIONS-

A verbal promise to take shares does not

constitute stockholder; Fanning vs. Hiber-

nia Ins. Co. Ohio.........

236

Board of Directors, when no power to dimin-

ish capital stock; Gill vs. Balis. Mo ......... 154

Certificate specifying, fixes location; Pelton,

treasurer, vs. Northern Transportation ('o.

Ohio.

338

De facto and de jure, same footing as to credi-

tors; Rowland vs. Meader Furniture Co.

Ohio......

603

De facto ousted, no defence against collection

of stock subscription .....

Ibid

Discounting exchange at greater interest than

allowed by charter, bill void; Kilbreth, ss.
signee, vs. Bates et al. Ohio.......

561

In proceedings to appropriate private proper-

ty; Wagner vs. Ñ. Y. C. & St. L. Ř'yCo.

Ohio.....

433

Office regarded as location for taxing; Pelton

338

lowed; Piatt vs. Sintun, Ohio......

CONTINGENT ('EES.

262

129

[ocr errors]

vs. Yorthern Transportation Co. Ohio...... 358

Right of Stockholders as to directors, after

sale by receiver; State cx rel. vs. Merchant

et al. Ohio.....

203

Stockholders witi drawing prior to payment

of debts: Gill rs. Balis, Mo.......

134

Status of Mutual Life Associations in Ohio;

State er rel. vs. Siandard Life Association.

Ohio......

596

CORRECTION-Melvin vs. Weiant; page 24..... 49

('ORRESPONDEXOD..

.411, 528, 595

COSTS—Recovered on second trial not lien on first;

Loomis vs. Second (iermania Building As-

sociation. Ohio..........

295

COL'YCII-Powers of, as to extending street rail-

ways; Sims et al. vs. Brooklyn Street R'y

('n, Ohio........

412

COUNTER-CLAIM ON COUNTER-CLAIM 616

COUSTY (OMMISSIONERS-

Duties; Jevyinassessments, &r., for “two-.

mile" road improvement; State ca: rel. vs.

('omissioners Fayette (0. Ohio.......

384

Powers in joint session, of two counties as to

ditch ; Cheslırongh vs. ('ommisioners Put-

nam and Pauldig. Ohio.........

367

(OLYTY TREASURER-

Mandamus to compel payment state taxes ;

Ohio rr rel. vs. Staley, treasurer. Ohio...... 574

What funds may be used for state taxes....... Ibid

(OURT MARTIAL-Enlisted minor; In .re Wall.

U. S..

108

CREDITOR-Right to retain all unpaid securities;

Hunter vs. Moul. Pa........

152

DAMAGES-

Action against railroad brought in different

state; Patton et al. vs. P. C. & St. Louis

R'y Co, Pa....

613

Assessment of against State, Sec. 6753 Rer.

Statutes ; Obio ex rel. vs. Board of Public

Works. Ohjo......

61

Flooding of mine; Williams vs. Pomeroy

Coal Co. Obio........

406

For brearh contract; expected protits; Allis

vs. McLean et al. Mich....

024

For negligent transinission telegraph mes-

sage; Western Union Telegraph Co. vs.

Griswolil and Dunham. Ohio......

246

In action for, against railroad for injuries by

fellow einployee; P. C. & St. L. R’y Co. vs.

Henderson. Ohio.

398

Liability, against one setting fire on his own

premnises, spreading to another; Krippner

vs. Biebl. Minn......

125

Measure of against railroad for not improve

ing street; tin. & S. R’y Co. vs. Carthage.

Ohio

122

Weasure of, against innocent purchasers;

L. S. & M. s: R'y vs. Hutchins, guardian.
Obio ....

280

Measure of, breach of contract; Western Un.

ion Tel.Co. vs. Berham & Moeller. Tex.... 132

No evidence of, case taken from jury; Phila.
& R. R. vs. Schartel. Pa.........

109
Quantum, physical suffering, drunken man ;
Lexington vs. uger. Ky .........,

662

Special, where allegation required; Melvin

vs. Weiant. Ohjo......

24

DEAD (THE) PRESIDENT.

98

DEATH OF PARTIES PENDING PROCEED-

INGS IN ERROR-Practica; Williams vs.

Englebrecht et al. Ohio.....

488

DEBT-

Loose declaration, not changing to gift or ad-

rancement; Harley vs. Harley. Md......... 489

When made, after voluntary release under

seal, void ; Ingersoll vs. Martin. Md......... 604

DEBTOR AND CREDITOR-Instrument in form

of warehouse receipt given to secure creditor,

when void ; Thorne vs. Nat'l Bank........ 204

DEED-Undue influence, in execution of; Cher-

bonnier vs. Evitts. Mo...

142

DEFECTIVE SERVICE-Cured by appearance,&c.

Handy et al. vs. Ætna Ins. Co. **Obio...... 289

DEFECTIVE SIDEWALK-Council with notice

liable for damages; Lexington vs. Auger.

Ky ................

162

brongh vs. Commissioners. &c. Ohio......... 367

Act 63, 0. L. 155, construed ; Kent vs. Perkins.

Ohio.......

120

Assessment for....

Ibid

In two counties, application for damages;

Chesbrough vs. Commissioners of Putnam,

& Ollio.........

367

In two counties, each commissioner part of

joint board......

Ibid

Majority of commissioners in two counties

may locate........

Ibid

DIVORCE-

A decree in another state where neither party

is domiciled, void; Van Fossen vs. State.

Ohio.........

260

Agrecment of separation, when a bar to;

Squires vs. Squires. Vt..

106

Effect of decree vesting title in wife, &c.;
Gallagher vs. Fleury. Ohio.......

119

DIVORCE (THE) INCREASE OF

33+

DOGS–Licence fee for, not tax; Cole vs. John
Hall, collector. Ill...

611

DOWER-

Acts of widow as evidencing election to take

under will, or ; Milliken, administrator,vs.

Welliver, administrator. Ohio.......

355

Widow to acquire cquitablo estate husband

must have been in possession; Abbott vs.

Bosworth. Ohio......

74

DRUNKENNESS AND CRIME.

568

DUTIES OF JURIES.....

569

ECCENTRIC BEQUESTS......

32

ELECTION-

By acrilamation, one nominee ; State of Ohio

vs. Green. Ohio.....

175

Members of council present cannot defeat by

refusing to vote.....

Ibid

Acquiescence in clerks.....

Ibid

ELECTION OF REMEDIES—Right to proceed

against principal and surety at same time;

Second Nat'l Bank vs. D. Morrison et al.

(Cuyahoga Co. 'C. P.) Ohio....

.......................

225

EMINENT OHIO LAWYERS

279

EMPIRICISM-Act May 5, 1868, construed; West

vs. Clutter. Ohio.......

250

ENDORSER-

Agreement limiting liability, &c.; Second

Nat'l Bank vs. Morrison et al. (Cuyaloga

Co. C. P.) Ohio..............

223

Induced by fraud, liable to innocent endorsee;

Pitt, Graham & Co. vs. Foglesong: Ohio...

423

Holder of check need not endorse ; McCurdy

vs. The Society for Savings. (Cuyaloga Co.

C. P.) Ohio.......

636

EQUITY-

Clear title to maintain bill quiia timet ; Cham-

berlain vs. Marshall et al. U. S....

309

Rescission of contract, fraud or mistake;

Lynch's appeal. Pa......

102

Specific periormance, accordance with terms

on contract; Marietta & Cincinnati R. R.

Co. vs. Western Union Tel. Co, et al. Ohio.. 436

When judgment lien not decreed invalid;

Gifford vs. Morrison, Ohio......

367

Both parties unfair, decree not granted ;

Lynch's appeal. Pa........

102

ERROR—Testimony of withdrawn party; Conger

vs. Bean et al., Ohio...........

610

ESTOPPEL-

Specific performance as; Porter vs. Wagner.

Obio.

6

Relying on former judgment, must plead;

Fanning vs. Hibernia Ins. Co. Obio........... 254

EVIDENCE-

Absence of, to sustain a judgment, set aside;

Western Union Tel, Co. vs. Bertram &

Moeller. Tex........

Action against telegraph company for negli-

gent transmission, burden of proof on de-

fendant; Western Union Tel. Co. vg. (dris-

wold & Dunbam. Ohio.......

Allowing defendant to open and close, error

without special reason shown; Dille vs.

Lovell et al. Ohio..

A correction of testimony by letter ; when

proper; Cullen et al. vs. Burnett et al, Ohio

Aitempt to cure error by striking out part of

testimony; Pinney, Administrator, vs.

Orth et al. N. Y......

Burden, to prove failure subject matter on

defendant; Scioto Fire Clay Works Vs.

Pond. Ohio......

Burden, on transferee on fraudulent note;

Darrow vs. Blake. Minn....

Burden, defendant pleading insanity in

criminal cases ; People vs. Hamilton. (al.

Burden, valid modification, terms of note on

plaintiff; Andrews vs. Campbell. Ohio.....

Burden, to disprove, negligence on agent los-

ing money of principal..............

Checks, to prove accommodation exchange

of, and disproving payments; Albrecht vs.

Breder. Pa..

Circumstantial; charging jury to explain

and connect facts; error; Robertson vs.

State of Texas. Tex.....

Cohabitation as; marriage; Badger vs. Badger.

N. Y......

Conversation between testator and defend.

ant; Pinney, administrator, vs. Orth et al.

N. Y....

Excluding facts on which opinion of expert

is based ; Koons vs. State.Ohio........

Except as to specified matters, husband and

wife competent, for or against; Howard,

administrator, v8. Brower. Ohio......

Expert testimony, facts open to common ob-

servation; Knoll vs. Wisconsin. Wis........

Former marriage, life of wife, to prove biga-

my. Cal.....

Foreign record of birth of; Germania Ins.

Co. vs. Rudwig, &c. Ky..

Holding over after term of lease, &c.; Eleva-

tor Co. V8. Brown. Ohio..........

Incompetent opinion as to Jaw of witness,

competent as to interest; Obio Coal Co. vs.

Davenport. Ohio.........

In homicide, admission of third party that he

had killed' deceased, not; Aken vs. State of

Texas. Tex.......

Self-defense in assault, character for peare of

prosecuting witness; Upthegrove vs. State.

Ohio ......

Intoxication in public place, what consti-

tutes; State vs. Moriarity. Ind........
Proof under Sec. 133 of Code; Lake Shore vs.

Mich. Southern R'y Co. vs. Lavalley. Ohio.
Of indebtedness and payment distinguished;

Home Ins. Co. vs. Tighe. Pa...........
of insanity - Preponderating testimony;

People vs. Wreden. Cal.....
Of irascibility, as proving impulse; Sindram

vs. the People. N. Y.....
Parol testimony as to the contents of written

instruments; Scioto Valley Rly Co. vs.

Cronin. Obio..........
Plaintiff must prove want of ordinary care in

action against railroad; P.C. & St.L. R'y vs.

McMillan. Ohio........

Presumption in bigamy, of continuing

life of first wife; People vs. Feilen. Cul...

Reasonable doubt clearly established; Peo-

ple vs. Wreden. Cal......

Relation between parties on different pleas ;

Moran vs. Abbey & Heffner. Cal......

Reports of mercantile agencies; declaration

of third parties: Cook vs. Penryhn Slate

Co. Ohio.....

Reputation of witness-Negation of testi-
mony. State vs. Nelson. Iowa..........

Term "family" not necessarily include wife;
People vs. Feilen. Cal.........

136

Testimony surviving parties as to extrane.

ous facts, valid; Pinney, adımistrator, ss.

Orth et al. N. Y.

612

Testiinony ruled out an error, subsequently
allowed ; Stato vs. Nelson. Iowa

5:22

Variance in 'name of, wonian, proving non

marriage; Barnett vs. Ward. Ohio..... 13

When adinission of incompetent, ground for

reversal; (ook vs. Penrylin Slate Co. Ohio.
When deposition by relvase of partner, ad.

missible; Conger et al. vs. Bean et al. Iowa. 610
Where, tends to make (uso for plaintiff, for

jury and supreme court will not weigh it;
('uddy vs. Horn. Ohio........

519
Wife of convict; State vs. McIntire, Iowu...
Witness as medical expert allowed to read

from inedical works; Knoll vs. Wisconsin.

Wis.........

614

Written statements as affecting another's

promise; Andrews vs. ('ampbell, Ohio..... 37

EVIDENCE AS TO CHARACTER

31

EXAMINING COMMITTEE FOR 1882..

259

'YECUTION-Stay of, executed after time, valid

as common law contract; Boling vs. Young.

Ohio.....

:504

EXECUTOR-Where co-executor declines, duty

devolves upon acting; ('ollier vs. Grimesey. O.
EXECUTORY AGREEMENT-Purchase of stock

from corporation by stockholder; Coppin vs.
Greenlees & Ransom (o. Ohio........

583

EXEMPLARY DAMAGES....

99

EXEMPLARY DAMAGES FOR INJURIES TO
PROPERTY FRAUD, &C.......

374

EXEMPTION, BENEFIT OF-

Must be asserted by him who is entitled;

Sked vs. Sedgley et al. Ohio.................... 72

Militia duty......

Ibid

EXPERT

Exclusion of facts on which opinion is based,

error ; Koons vs. State. Ohio.....

12

Testimony as to facts open to common oh-

servation ; medical, may read extracts from

medical works; Knoll vs. Wisconsin. Wis. 615
EXTRADITION..

378

FEES-

Prosecuting attorney for prosecution of fel-

ony, cannot demand from citizens ; C. S. &

C. R. R. Co. vs. Lee. Ohio..............

337

Reasonable attorney, allowed assignee; Ing-

ham Bros. vs. Lindemann, assignee. Obio 178

FEE SIMPLE-

Devise of all, a; Piatt vs. Sinton. Ohio..... 262

Lands conveyed to a Board of Education, its

successors and assigns, & ; Taylor' vs. Bin-

ford. Ohio.......

225

FELLOW SERVANT

Injuries by, as absolving master; P. C. & St.

L. R'y Co. vs. Ranney. Ohio..........

+55

When injuries caused by, not a defense as to

employer; P. C. & St. L.R’y Co.vs. Hender-

son. Ohio........

398

FELONY, COMPOUNDING A-Not available as

defense for recovery of mortgaged property ;
Williams vs. Englebrecht. Ohio.......

263

FIRE INSURANCE-

Acceptance of note waives " actual payment

of premium;" Little vs. Eureka Ins. ('o.

Ohio.......

492

Re-insurance; rights as to full amount called

for in policy; Detroit Fire and Marine Ins.

Co. vs. Commercial Ins, Co. Ohio.............. 449

Cancellation of policy; Home Ins. Co. vs.

Tighe. Penn

110

Mutual knowledge of falsity of alleged fact

warranted; Conn. Mutual Fire Ius. Co. vs.

Huntzinger for use. Pa.......

46

Open policy; Farmers' Ing.Co.vs. Butler. Ohio 506

Oral contract of agents, owners not liable;

Hower vs. State Ins. Co. Iowa.......

49

Power of receiver to bring suit to recover

asset; Gill vs Balis. Mo............................ 154

FORGERY-Signature to deed by pretended agent;

State vs, Wilsor Minn....

93

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

FORFEITURE

Life insuranco policy by non-payınent pre-
mium ; Robertson vs. Metropolitan Life

Ins. ('o. X. Y...........
Reason for clause of ; in corporation charter ;

Kilbroth, assignee, vs. Bates et al. Ohio..... FORMER RECOVERY-Against Masonic lodge

as a body. no bar to subsequent suit against

inembers as individuals; Ash vs. Guie. Pa. FRAL'D

Agent without authority to buy, title to chat.

tel does not pass; Hanet vs. Tetcher, Ohio Bona fide mortgage on fraudulent title, good;

Shorten v's. Drake et al. Ohio.........
By Board of Directors of corporation; Gill

vs. Balis, Mo...........
('reditor of fraudulent vendor; title after

sale; Ohio ('oal (o. vs. Davenport, Ohio... Distinction between msirepresentation and

opinion ; Wilkinson vs. Clawson. Minn.. Heir way by cross-petition attack sale by ad

ministrator, on ground of; Sidener vs.

Hawes et al. Ohio.....
One induced by, to endorse, liable; Pitts,

Graham ('0. 1's. Foglesong. Ohio....... FRAUDULENT (ONVEYANCES, LAW OF..... FREE TURNPIKE-Taxation of: Bowler et al.va.

Beddinger Free Turnpike ('o. (Hamilton

('o. (. P.) Ohio... GREAT LAWYER, A.... GIARDI.IX

Jurisdiction of court to appoint; minorty ;

luvacy; King vs. Bell et al. Ohio..........

Liability of stirety.. Gl’ARUSTEE-Distinction between, and original

on promissory note; Mizner vs. Shoir. Pa... GENERAL REPUTATION—(haracter of prose

cuting witness in assault and battery for

peare; Upthegrove vs. State. Ohio...... GAMBLING CONTRACTS... GAJE LAW-l'nlawful to kill wild duck against

will of owner in navigable strearn ; State vs.

John Shannon. Ohio......
GENESIS OF PERJURY ................
HABEAS CORPUS-

Enlisted minor; in re wall; V. S......
Father, unsuitable person not entitled to cus-

tody of child; ('incinnati House of Refuge

vs. Rvan. Obio....... HARBORING A THIEF-State of Ohio vs. Doug

las. (Belmont (. P.) Ohio................ HEIR

Illegitimate treated as member of family ;

Ewing et al. vs. Richards; (Holmes Co.)

Ohio... May by cross-petition protect bis vendee against sale by administrator; Sidenerf vs.

Hawes et al. Ohio......... HENRY (THE) (OLE-HARMOX ("ÅSE. HISTORY OF (THE) DEVELOPMENT OF THE

ROMAN LAW, C ........ HOMESTEAD

Allowance of 8300 in lieu of; in re estate of

Martin. (Erie ('ouxty Probato ('ourt.) To be subject of ; wife's consent according to

statute ; Blevins et al. vs. ('ameron et al.

Tex......... HOMICIDE

Evidence inadmissible as to irascibility;

Sindram vs. People. Y. Y......
Indictment, third party admits killing de-

ceased, not; Iken vs. State of Texas. Tex. Instruction to the jury “murder in the first

degree or acquital;" Knoll vs. Wisconsin.

Wis...
HOXOR (THE) OF A VOC'ATIOX..
HONORS .....
HUSBAND AND WIFE-

Competent witness for and against; Howard,

adininistrator, vs. Brower. Obio......... Husband's interest in mortgage under verbal

gift of wife ; Fay vs. Sanderson et al. Mich. ICE-Merchantable; "fairly pass ;”. Cullen et al.

55 512

IMPORTANT LIFE INSURANCE CASE............ 428 IMPORTANT PAPER-....

412 INDICTMENT–Sufficient reference without fur

ther averment; Oshe vs. State. Ohio........... 361 "INFAMOUS.".

217 INFAMOUS STAR ROUTE ROBBERY...

259 INJUNCTION

Affidavits to disclose necessities, &c., on pre

liininary henring; Lake Shore & Michigan
Southern R’y Co. vs. New York, C. & S.L.
R'y. U.S........

187 When railroad company inay be enjoined

from constructing, &c., in ciiy; Scioto Val-
ley R'y vs. Lawrence. Ohio........

451 When supreme court will allow. &c.;. Wag

ner vs. Y. Y., C. & St. L. R'y Co. Obio...... 433. IXXOC'EST PARTIES–As between, which shall

sutter; Nolte et al. vs. Wm. P. Hulbert,
trustee. Ohio..........

339 INSANE

Expense clothing patient in asylum; State
ei rel. vs. Kiesewetter. Ohio.....

408 Expense patients in state asylums; Sup't

then's Asylum vs. Frame, auditor (Aihthens ('ounty, (. P.) Ohio.....

353 Statement of, as evidence ; People vs. W’reden. (al.....

157 INSANITYJudge Davis on .....

327 In criminal cases as defense, burden proof on

defendant ; People vs. Hamilton. (al........ 653
Preponderating testimony suitlicient; People
l's. Wreden. (al............

157
Witness, not an expert, may give opinion
from conversation, ('al...

Ibid
Emotional, as defcne in homicide ; State vs.
Peter D. (ole. (Henry ('0. ('. P.) Ohio......

364 INSURANCE BENEFITS........

313 INTEREST

Excess of legal, agreement definite in terms;
Andrews is. (ampbell. Obio.....

37 Yot adjudged against state under general

statutue; State ex rel. vs. Board of Public
Works. Ohio..........

61 Mode of collection for illegal, taken by Nat'l

Bauks; Huntington vs, Krejci et al. (Cuyahoga Co. ('. P.) Obio......

183 Yational currency act as to illegal, exclusive. Ibid INTESTATE-('reditors of, entitled to have set.

tled in due course ; Sidener vs. Hawes at al.
Ohio

402 JOIST WROXG-Several parties, without concert, inflicting ; liable ; ('uddy "s. Horn. Mich...

519 JOURNALISTIC ADVANCEMENT....

17 JUDGMENT

Absence of evidence to sustain, set aside;

Western Union Tel. Co. vs. Bertram &
Voeller. Tex........

122 As determining right of parties as to fact ;

1. S. & M. S. R'. Hutchins, guardian.
Obio..

280
Error to reverse or modify, it
Stambaugh. Oliio.....

347 Just conform to verdict or jury in appropria.

tion by corporation ;. Wagner vs. $. Y.
& St, Louis R. R. Ohio......

133 Power of appellate court to modify; Cleve

land of Jaboning R. R. ('0.vs. Himrod Fur-
nace ('o. Ohio......

327 Presumed to be founded on proper proof; Sidener vs. Hawes et al. Ohio......

402 When a bar if acquiesced in; Weaver vs.Carnaban, Ohio........

265 When not released payment by surely under

duress: Boling vs. Young. Ohio............... 504 JURISDICTION

Appellate, of supreme court, to allow tempo

rary injunction; when ; Wagner vs. N. Y.,
C. &. St. L, R. R. ('o. Ohio......

483 Litigants pro rata under 'ccrued ; action for

greater amount; Bachelder & Collins ve.
Richardson et al. Va

489
State courts no, in maritime cases; Hamilton
vs. Merrill et al. Ohio..........

427 JUROR-Opposed to law under which case is tried; State vs. Nelson. Iowa.......

522

108

163

443

462

402 383

114

'Tod vs.

026

78

605

141

61+ 321 559

305

537

vs. Bimm. Ohic......
IDEAL LAWYER, THE........
IMPORTANT DIVORCE DECISION...
IMPORTANT INSURANCE DECISION.

180 525 231 619

JURY

Case taken from, in _default of evidence;

Phila. and Reading R. R. vs. Schartel. Va. 109
Em panneling in capital cases; McHugh vs.
State. Ohio.....

563 Instruction tr, onsidered in integrity; Rose vs

The Ştephens & Condit Transportation Co.
U. S.........

463
In capital case, expressing, opinion prima
facia incompetent; McHugh vs. State. Ohio 563
Judging of reasonableness of apprehended

danger; Oder vs. Commonwealth. Ky ...... 639 Special erroneous charge in addition to general; repeating general and not special; Floyd vs. Moore. Ohio...........

487 JURY TRIAS....

393 JUSTICE OF THE PEACE-No jurisdiction in

action on constable's bond; Hornbuckle vs.
The State. Ohio.........

238 KAHN (THE) KIDNAPPING ('ASE..

.607, 631 LAND-When regarded as money; distribution; Collier vs. Grimsey. Ohio......

20 LAND WARRANT-When fraudulent as against

the United States ; Coan vs. Flagg. Ohio...... 559 LAW AND LAWYERS...

658 LAWYERS AS LAW-MAKERS..

98 LAWYERS VS. LAW-MAKERS..

558 LAY OPINIONS OF A BANKRUPT LAW......... 580 LEASE

Opinion as to premises; misrepresentation ;
Wilkinson vs. Clawson. Minn ........

521 Payments for improvements after termina

tion; Elevator Co. vs. Brown. Ohio....... 124 Right to remove mineral, not of land itself;

Scioto Fire Brick Works vs. Pond. Ohio... 479
Under terms; coal; amount to be paid for;
Tod vs. Stambaugh. Ohio.........

347 LEASE FOR LIFE-Agreement constituting, not

in specified terms; Warren vs. Tanner et al.
Ohio

483 LENGTHY PLEAS.......

96 LIABILITY OF INNKEEPER FOR LOSS OF GUESTS' PROPERTY.

510 LIABILITY OF PRINCIPALS FOR USURIOUS LOAN OF AGENT.

644 LIBEL-Matter published in good faith in which

public has an interest ; Crane vs. Bostou Ad-
vertiser. U. S.........

475 LIBRARY, AN ORIGINAL........

175 LIBRARY ASSOCIATION

Such parts of building as are rented for profit,

subject to tax ; Cleveland Library Ass'n vs.
Pelton, treasurer. Ohio.......

40 When "an institution of purely public charity."..

Ibid LICENSE

Pond law, void and unconstitutional; State
vs. Hipp. Ohio.........

543 Defined.

Ibid Power to, in term “regulating management;"

Allerton vs. city of Chicago et al. U. S.... 11 LIEN-Judgment; not invalid, when; Gifford vs. Morrison. Ohio,.....

367 LIFE INSURANCE

Contrary to public policy; without interest;

Mutual Benefit Ass'n vs. Hoyt. Mich......... 143 Draft in payment of premium, effect of ; Pen

dleton vs. Knickerbocker Life Ins. Có. U.S. 168 False declarations when made part of policy;

Gormania Life Ins, Co, vs. Rudwig, Ky... 532
Forfeiture; Robertson vs. Metropolitan Life
Ins. Co. N. Y...

652
Policy & contract between assured and Insu-
rer; Robinson vs. Duvall. Ky..

77 Policy, testamentary provision as to beneficiaries......

Ibid
Right of assured to assign policy, when not; Ibid
Sobstantial truth only required in answer-

ing questions ; Union Life Ins. Co. rs. Em-
ma Cheever; Obio..........

529 LIMITED LIABILITY ACT”-Does not ap

ply, where; Cuddy vs, Horn. Mich........ 519 LIMITATION-Distinction between parties, and

time of action; Scioto Valley R'y vs. Cropin.
Obio ........

515 LIQUOR-Sec. 6942 Rev. Stat. as to, constitutional; Oshe vs. State. Obio......

361

LODGE SEA-When members bound by; Ash vs. Guie. Pa...........

75 LOSS-Re-insuring company, when to be paid in

full; Detroit Fire & Mutual Ins. Co. vs.
Commercial Ins, Co, Ohio...........

449 LOSS OF GOODS BY CARRIERS...

663 LUNACY-Jurisdiction of court to appoint guardian. King vs. Bell et al. Ohio.........

58 MALICE-Predominant motive in erecting on

struction, &c.; Gallagher vs. Dodge. Conn... 498 MALPRACTICE

479 Communication

491 MANDAMUS

Petition for, not defective; Ohio ex rel. vs.
Staley, treasurer. Ohio.......

574 Damages against State; Sec, 6753 of Code;

State er i el. vs. Board of Public Works. 0.. 61
Proceedings against municipal officer do not
abate, when;Thompson vs. U. S. ex rel.
U. S.......

8 To compel payment state' taxes by county

treasurer ; Ohio cx rel. vs. Staley, treasurer.
Ohio,

574 MANTLE OF GEO. K. NASH..

491 MARRIAGE-Established by proof of cohabitation; Badger vs. Badger. N. Y..........

592 MARRIED WOMAN

Claiın against husband after assignment;

statute of limitation ; Simmerson, admin-
istrator, vs. Tennery. Ohio.....

272 Not personally liable for services ordered for

family; Flynn vs. Messenger. Minn ........ 105 What chargeable with; Patrick vs. Littell. Ohio

2 MARINE INSURANCE-Jurisdiction Ohio courts

over foreign; Handy et al. vs. Ætna Ins. Co.
Ohio....

289 MASTER AND SERVANT-Hiring by the year ; Bascom vs. Shillito. Oiio.....

319 MAYORS OF CITIES PERFORMING MAR. RIAGE CEREMONIES...

313 MECHANICS LIEN

Charging a married woman's separate estate ;

Blevins et al. vs. Cameron et al. Tex..... 79
When precluded from asserting against com-

pany-creditors; West, trustee, vs. Klotz.
Ohio

291 MEMOIRS

568 MINOR

Federal enlistment, validity; In re wall. U.S. 108
Proceedings for commitment to House of

Refuge; notice to father; Cincinnati House
of Refuge vs. Ryan. Ohio.......

163 MORAL CHARACTER_Of criminal; State vs. McIntire. Iowa....

628 MODE OF PROCEDURE–To set aside sale under

mortgage after confirmation; Sked vs. Sedge
ley. Ohio.............

72 MORTGAGE

Exemption from sale under; military laws; Ibid
Given to compound felony; Williams vs.
Englebrecht. Ohio......

263 Indemnity, covering joint loans; Nesbit vs. Worts et al. Ohio......

286 When superior to inechanic's lien; West, trustee, vs. Klotz et al. Ohio.......

29 Bona fide on fraudulent title, good; Shorten vs. Drake. Ohio........

494 MORTGAGES..............

617 MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS

Liability for damages in street improve

ments; Keating vs. Cincinnati. Ohío........ 585 Police powers inherent, cannot be transfered;

Alderson vs. City of Chicago et al. U. S... 11 Responsibility for negligence of employees; Ironton vs. Kelley. Ohio...........

486 MUNICIPAL OFFICERS

Ad interim employee appointed by mayor on

disapproval by council ceases to be an offi

cer of; State ex rel. vs. Heinmiller. Ohio... 473 Power of mayor to appoint and suspend...... Ibid. Suspended without cause, when not entitled

to wages; Steubenville vs. Culp. Ohio...... 439 Wrongfully dismissed; salary for time out of

position; Terhune vs. the Mayor. N. Y..... 476

« PreviousContinue »