Page images
PDF
EPUB

494

567

Ohio ......

333

MU'TUAL AID ASSOCIATIONS

Act April 12, 1880, does not enlarge class ;

State ex rel. vs. Moore, Supt. Ohio...... 425
Status of companies organized in other states; Ibid
Status of, defined ; State ex rel. vs. Standard
Life Ass'n, Ohio....

596 NATIOX'S (THE) SORROW ....

81 NEGLECTED (A) DISTRICT.

94 NEGLIGENCE

Burden of proof of ; Western Union Tel. Co.
V's. Griswold & Dunham. Ohio.......

246 By railroad making running switch; Phila.

& Keading R. R. va. Troutman. Pa..... 661 City responsible for, of employees; Ironton vs. Kelly. Ohio.....

486 Contributory and concurrent ; when not im

puted to plaintiff; Covington Transfer ('o.
V's. Kelly. Ohio.......

24
Effect of no evidence of; Phila, & Reading
R. R. vs. Shartel. Pa.......

109 In agent, loss of money in carriage, borden of proof; Darling vs. Younker. Ohio........

349 Inferred from fact of explosion of boiler;

Rose vs. Stephens & Condit Transportation
Co. U. S.......

463 of foreman of railroad, in protection of em.

ployees; L. S. & M. S. R'y vs. Lavalley. (). 44 Plaintiff must prove, against railroad in killing stock; P. C. &. St. L. R’y vs. McMillen.

412 Setting fire, extending to premises of an

other; Krippner vs. Biebl. Minn ...... 125 Locomotive blocking crossing, not contribu

tory to cross another place ; Phila. & Read-
ing R'y vs. Troutman. Pa.....

661 NEW BOOKS,

American Decisions, Vols. XXVII and
XXVIII.

145 American Decisions, Vol. XXIX

218 American Decisions, Vol. XXX..

289 American Decisions, Vol. XXXI American Decisions, Vol. XXXII..

432 American Decisions, Vol. XXXII

503 Ameriran Decisions, Vol. XXXIV

571 American Decisions, Vol. XXXV.

621 (ompensation for legal services .........

269 Conveyancing, the law of....

431
Corporations, a manual of the law of..... 333
Criminal law and practice of California...... 145
Digest of American Decisions, Vols. I to
XXX, inclusive....

467 Digest (A) of Revised Statutes of Ohio, relat

ing to railroad and telegraph companies..... 161 Manual for Assignees...

468 Nevada Reports, Vol. XV......

1 Oddities of the Law...

218 Ohio State Reports, Vol. XXXVI..

289 Oliver's Conveyancing

1 Pleadings, parties and forms under the Code. 571 Pomeroy's Equity Jurisprudence.....

620 Revised Statutes of Ohio, 2d edition ....

343 Sawyer's United States Court Reports.....

432 Transcript of Decisions in Supreme Court of Iowa......

467 United States Court Reports, Vol. I...

432 l'sages and Customs

209 NEW (A) METHOD OF ADVANCING CASES ON THE DOCKET

317 NEW PUBLICATIONSThe Journal of Banking Law

503 The Texas Law Journal..

503 United States Supreme Court Reporter ......... 527 NEW TRIAL

In capital cases, by reason of gross incompe

tence of counsel; State vs. Jones. Mo...... 590 When, no error in refusing; Ridenour vs. The State. Ohio ....

589 NOTARY PUBLIC

Certificate, deed or mortgage, a judicial act;

Commonwealth for use vs.Haines et al. Pa. 47 Extent of liability where imposed on by false impersonation.......

Ibid

NOTICE

Attachment, &c., on property, as husbands
fraudulently in wife's title, not; to bona

fide mortgagee; Shorten vs. Drake. Ohio...
Not to kill game on property of another;
State vs. John Shannon. "Ohio........

55 When surety or guarantor is not entitled to,

of dishonor of note; Hunter vs. Moul. Pa. 152 NOVATION-Release of party and, effect of; Bacon vs, Daniels. Ohio....

237 NUISANCE

Obstructing public road : Cin. Southern R'y
vs. Commonwealth. Ky ......

496 Slanghter house, priina fuciu. Md......

4.35 OBITUARY Banning, H. B...

259 Browning, 0, H., (I11.)..........

1 Dennison, William.

573 Ewart, Thomas W.

130 Fox, Charles.....

.363, 373 Powers, Willis W.

65 Rankin, Frank F.

203 Wilson, D. M......

363 OF COURSE HE WAS AN OHIO MAN

529 OFFICIAL BOND-Applied to duties, before as

well as after exocutivn; Dawson et al. vs.
State. Ohio.....

4e1 OHIO STATE REPORTS.

571 OHIO (AN) TICIBORNE CASE...

131 OLD TIME INSURANCE...

145 OPENING PRIVATE LETTERS. ORDINANCE

Grade of street under contract with railroad.
Cin. & S. R. R. vs. Carthage......

122
For punishinent of known thief, valid; Mo-
ran, Sup't, vs. Nolte. Ohio.....

253 Inoperative in rescision ; when; Cin. & S. R. R. vs. Carthage. Obin.....

122 ORDINARY COURSE OF THINGS-Legitimate

presumption or ; Rose vs. Stephens & Condit
Transportation Co. U. S...

463 OUSTER-Against directors of railroad company

after sale of receiver; Stato ex relve. Mer-
chant et al. Ohio..........

203 OVERDUE CHECKS.......

561 OWNER—When liable for sewer assessment; Davis vs. Cincinnati.

7 PAROLE. CONTRACT–Specific perforinance of ;

Ewing et al. vs. Ricbards et al. (Holmes Co.
C. P.) Ohio...

460 PART PERFORMANCE-A verbal trust, when

enforced ; Robbins vs. Robbins. N. Y. 619 PARTIES-Final judgment as to three; reversal

as to two; King vs. Bell et al. Ohio........... 59 PARTITION

Ambiguous deviso as to quality of land; how

enforced ; Corwine vs. Moll. Ohio......... 35 Effect Statue of limitation as against admin

istrator; Lafferty vs. Shini. Ohio............ 411 PARTNERS

Stockholders de facto corporation liable as ;

Rowland vs. Meader Furniture ('o. Ohio... 603 Where conduct of party is relied on to charge

laim as; Cook vs. Penryhn. Ohio........ 22 PARTNERSHIP-Mutual benefit society not gore

erned by same rules as ; Ash vs. Guie. Pa... 75 PASSENGER-Rights of in public conveyances... PAYMENT

Acceptance of note for antecedent indebted.
ness; not; Hunter vs. Moul. Pa......

152 Sutficient to take case out of statute of limi.

tation of principal; effect as to surety;

Glick, administrator, vs. Samuel (rist. 0. 270 PECULIAR (A) CASE...

620 PERMIT-- Distinction between, and assumption

conferring corporate powers ; Sims et al. vs.
Brooklyn Street R’y. Ohio.......

412 PERSONAL PROPERTY=Vendee liable for dam

ages in refusing to accept ; Cullen at al. rs.
Bimm et al. Ohio.......

180 PETITIOX-Facts held to be suficient on; L. S.

& M. S. R'y vs. Hutchins, guardian. Ohio... 280 PHYSICIAN

Without diploma; good moral character;

ten years' practice; Wert rs. ('lutter, Ohio. 250 When third party liable for fees of; Berry vs. Pusey. Ky.

580

Ohio ..

589

305

5

..................

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

PLEADING

Averment necessary under indictment;

Ridenour vs. State. Ohio........
Agreement inferred not to be in writing, de-

fense available on deinurrer; Howard, ad-
ministrator, vs. Brower. Ohio......
Error or defect in, how regarded on appeal ;

Bear vs. Knowles. Obio......
Allegation of new matter_uot inconsistent

with petition in reply; Fanning vs. Hiber

nia Ins. ('o. Ohio...... Supplemental, where change in rights of par

ties after issue joined; L. S. & M. S. R'y Co. vs. Hutchins, guardian.

Ohio............ When proceedings in error commenced after

deniurrer to answer sustained; Latferty vs.

Shinn. Ohio..... PLEADINGS, PARTIES AND FORMS UNDER

THE CODE.... POND (THE) LAW POSTPOWING THE STAR ROUTE GRAND

JURY PRACTICE-Effect of cleath of party during pend

ency of proceedings in error; Williams vs.

Englebrecht et al. Ohio.......... PREMIUM-('ollection of; on unearned and can

celled policies ; Little vs. Eureka Fire Ins.

Co. Ohio..... PRESUMPTIOX

Vatural result of unlawful act; Ridenour vs.

State. Ohio...........
Of modification of original contract by pay-

ment of interest, &c.; Andrew's vs. Cainp

bell. (bio...... PRINCIPAL AND AGENT_Title to chattels do

not pass by sale of alleged agent; Hainet vs.

Letcher. Ohio..... PROBABLE CAUSE-When not necessary to al

lege malice; Diebl vs. Friester. Ohio......... PROFANITY. PROFESSIONAL ADVERTISING... “ PROFITS AND BENEFITS”- When term does

not devise fee; Coilier vs. Grimesey et al. 0. PROMISSORY NOTE

Continuing security for; of collateral; Day-
ton Nat'l Bauk vs. Merchants' Nat'l Bank.

Ohio...........
Evidence as to circumstances of signing and

delivery ; Conger, adm'r, vs. Bean et al.

Iowa.......
Evidence as to payment, where pleaded;

Moran vs. Abbey & Hetfier. Cal.....
Extent liability of surety to bona fide holder;

First Nat'l Bank vs. Fowler et al. Ohio...
Fraudulently obtained, effect of; Darrow vs.

Blake. lowa
Holder not compelled to exhaust security

principal ; Second Nat'l Bank vs. Morrison

et al. (Cuyahoga Co C. P.) Ohio..... One induced to endorse fraudulently, liable

to innocent indorsee; Pitt, Graham & Co.

VS. Foglesong. Ohio......
Once paid cannot be revived by endorsement

payee; Moran vs. Abbey & Heffner. Cal... “Pay to order of myself,"two drawers; First

Våt'l Bank vs. Fowler et al. Ohio..... Rights and liability and endorser; Second

Nat'l Bank vs. D. Morrison et al. (Cuya

hoga (o, C. P.) Ohio........ PUBLIC POLICY_Contract of insurer to pay to party with

interest, contrary to; Mutual Benefit Ass'n vs. Hoyt. Mich ......... PUBLIC ROAD-Actual obstruction; dangerous

to pass; Cin. S. R'y vs. Commonwealth. Ky. PUNISHMENT (THE) DEFENSEOF INSANITY

IN CAPITAL CASES.. PURCHASER-Rights of; at void sale; Burns vs.

Ledbetter. Tex...... QUÆRE QUANTUM MERUIT-When verdict not regard.

ed us finding; Howard, administrator, vs.

Brower. Obio..... QUESTIONS OF LAW. QUI PRIOR TEMPORE POTIOR EST JURE

Distribution, bequests 'equal; Shorten vs.

Drake. Ohio........

20

QUIA TIMET

To maintain bill, plaintiff inust have clear
equitable title. U. S..........

309 Siate ex rel vs. Merchant et al. Obio............

203 QUO WARRANTO

For ouster against directors of corporation;

State ex vel. vs. Merchant et al. Ohio......... 203
Need not give name of person entitled to

oust corporation officer; State ex rel. vs.
Heinmiller. Ohio.........

273 RAILROAD

Danages to fellow employees ; P. C. & St. L.
R’y vs. Ranney. Ohio.......

+45 By accepting performance of county com

missioners bound, though defective; Ath

ens Co. vs. B. S. L. K'y Co. Ohio......... 165 Consolidation-Kights of stockholders; Ohio R’y ('o. vs. Jewett...

517 Damages against for trespass, before condem

nation ; Leber vs. Minn & N. W. R’y Co.
Minni..

650 Directors may make contract for transporta

tion at tixed future period; Cleveland and
Mahoning Railroad vs. Himrod Furnace
Co, Ohio

219 Imposing penalty by art April 20, 1874, for

overcharge, constitutional; C. S. & ('.' R'y
V's. (ook. Ohio.........

231 In action against, want of ordinary care must

be proved ; P. C. & St. L. R’y vs. McMillan
Ohio...

112
Injury by fellow employee, when not a de-
fense; P. C. & St. L. R’y Co. vs. Henderson
Ohio....

398 Liability for damages in not improving

street; Cincinnati & Springtield R’y vs.
Carthage. Ohio......

122 Liability for injuries to employees; Lake

Shore & Michigan Southern R'y vs. Laval-
ley. Ohio.......

44 Lien for material, written notice to create ob

ligation ; Scioto Valley R’y Co. vs. Dennis
Cronin. Ohio.......

515 Not entitled to compensation for cattle

guards; Sharp vs. Nettleton. Ohio............ 505 Power to regulate stoppages, subject to leg

islative control, Penn, Co. vs. John Weutz.

Ohio.........
Sued in any county through which road

passes ; Ohio R’y Co. vs. Jewett. Ohio...... 517 Superintendent's order to particular train.

reasonable or unreasonable; P. C. & St. L.
R’y Co. vs. Henderson, Ohio........

398 Real estate not tuken from another by usual method; Lake Shore & Michigan Southern

R'y vs. N. Y. C. & St. L. R’y. U. S............ 167 Real estate held for necessary uses.....

Ibid
Two), cannot consolidate, when connected by

others holding by lease; State vs. Vander-
bilt. Ohio......

306 Will be enjoined from constructing on street,

when ; Scioto Valley R’y vs. Lawrence et
al. Ohio......

451 REAL ESTATE-Effect of sale of by heir, and

payment of preferred claims; Sidener vs.
Hawes. Obio.....

402 REAL ESTATE BROKER-Right to represent

both parties, when; Bell et al. vs. McConnell

161

[ocr errors]

610

126

68

654

225

423

126

68

225

303

no

143

496

66

Ohio.
RECEIVER-Appointment of, notice required,

unless ; Ohio R’y Co. vs. Jewett. Ohio.. 517 RECORD–Refusal to allow amendment of prme

legal plaintiff, error; Patton et al. vs. P. C. &
St. L. R’y Co. Pa..........

613 RECOVERY_To bar consequences, trespass in lu

ded; Williams vs. Pomeroy Coal Co. Ohio .. 41. REPORT-36 Ohio State....

:: 75 REPORTER (THE) NATIONAL......

129 RESIDENCE-Certificate of railroad directri's

failing to show defective; Siate vs. Vander-
bilt. Obio.....

386 RIGHT OF BAIL TO ARREST PRINCIPAL...... 621 RIGHT OF COUNSEL TO REPRESENT PROK

ECUTING WITNESS IN CRIMINAL

CASES. ................324, 333, 343, 345, 363, 431, 143

.....

459 363

305 65

494

[ocr errors]

41

402

0n

270

351

003

412

162

451

When not running against administrator in

favor of heirs; Lafferty vs. Shimn. Ohio...
When, not running against specific perform-

er of parol contract; Ewirig et ai. i's. Rich-

ardis et al. . (Holmes ('0. ('. P.) Ohio........
Assigunent of claims by wife against hus.

band, less than six years, not a bar ; Sim-

merson, adın'r, vs. Temuery. Ohio..,
STEPHENS VS. ALLMEX-Qualified; McLain

vs. Summington, Ohio.........
STOCK-

Holders; vle focto corporation liable as part-

hers; Rowland vs. Meader Furniture ('o.

Ohio......
Powers of member of board of Directors to

subscribe for ; Sims et al. ix. Brooklyn St.
K'y et al. Ohio.........
Shares subject of pledge; Dayton Nat'l Bank

V's, Merilants' Vai'l Bank. Ohio..............
STREET-Railroad constructing track on; when

enjoined ; Scioto Valley R'x. vs. Lawrence

et al. Ohio.......
STREFT ASSESSMENT-When owner may en-

join collection; Stone vs. Viele, Ohio.....
STREET IMPROVEMENT-Liability of munici-

pal corporation in making; Keating vs. Cin-

cinniti. Ohio.......
STREET RAILROAD)-Powers of; and council;

Sims et al.us. Brooklyn Street R'v ('o. 0.
SUBJECTIOX (THE) OF THE STATE TO LAW.
SUBROGATION-Right of surety to all rights and

collateral ; Second Nat'l Bank is. Morrison

et al. (C'uyahoga Co. ('. P.) Ohio...........
SUBSTANTIAL DEFECT IS IMPROVEMENT-

Rev. Stat., Sec. 5289 courtrued; Stone vs.

Viele. Ohio...............
SUNDAY-

Contract for contribution made on, not void;

Dale, trustee, vs. Knapp. Pa......
Owner permitting clerk selling on, liable to

penalty imposed by statute ; Seaman vs.

Commonwealth. Pa.........
SUPREME (THE) (OURT.
SUPREME COURT COMMISSION, A.
SUPREME COURT EXAMIXING COMMITTEE
SUPREME COURT (THE) REORGANIZATION

587

555

412
115

223

587

170

RIGHT OF WAY-Owner to construct, not inter-

serring with rights of others; Pomeroy vs.
Buckeye Sali ('o. Obio........

400
RIGHT TO SELL TICKETS OX SIDEWALK IN

FRONT OF (WYER'S PREMISES—Wal-
lack vs. Ticket Speculators. N. Y.....

591
RIPARIAN OWNER Owner

navigalle
stream, at common law, ownerspip tu middle

of stream; June et al. y's, Purcell, Ohio..., 70
Right to recover from sand......

lbid
ROAD IMPROVEMENT-

Duties of commisioners to raise money for;

Ohio ex rel. vs. l'umniissoners of fayette
('outy. Onio..........

381
Where liot siulicient money from local assess-

ment, commissioners to lery general tax... Ibid
ROBBERY-('ircunstantial evidence as to ; Roby-
ertson vs. State. Tex.......

139
RULES FOR ('ITATIONS..

20.
RULES FOR PRACTICE

298
SALARY-Wrongfully dismissed municipal otti-

cer, not allowed salary for time out of posi-

tion; Terhuic vs. The Mayor. X. Y............. 470
SCENE IK (HICAGO (OLRT...

525
SELF-DEFENSE-Mere threats do not constitute

ground for taking life; Oder vs. l'ommon-
wealth. ky...

339
SEPARATE DEFENSE-Several defendants, de-

feuse of one for all ; Tod vs. Stambaugh. (.. 347
SEPARATE ESTATE OF MARRIED WOMAX

CHARGEABLE WITH HER OBLIGA-
TIOXS...

314
SEPARATE PROPERTY OF MARRIED WO-

MAX; AX AMENDMENT WANTED.. 146
SEWER ASSESSMENT_Owner, not lessee liable;
Davis vs. Cincinnati.. Ohio......

6
SET OFF-01 one judgment against another;
Diehl vy, Friester. Ohio........

337
SHERIFF-Liability for goods sold-Trespass ;
Freeman et ux. vs. Apple et al. Pa......

524
SLANDER-Words actionable per se; Barrett vs.
Ward. Ohio. (See Sodoiny)............

18
SLAUGHTER-HOUSE-prima fucia nuisance ;
Woodyear vs. Schaefer. Md......

455
SMITH SUNDAY LAW....

191
SODOMY-Words charging; allegation of special

damage necessary. Melvin vy Weiant. Ohio. 24
SOLDIERS AND SAILORS' ORPHANS' HOME.

Construction of act April 19, 1881 ; State ex

rel. vs. Trustees of Soldiers' and Sailors'
Orphan's Home. Ohio.........

234
SOLICITORS CHARGING LIEN ON MONEYS
OF CLIENT.

146
SOLICITOR (A) STRUCK OFF THE ROLLS...... 63
SPECIAL LEGISLATION-For a release of sure-

ties by a majority of votes, constitutional;

State ex rel. vs. Board of Education. Ohio. 422
SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE-

Equity will not compel, when; Marietta &

C. R. R.vy. Western Union Tel. Co. Ohio... 436
Judgment as estoppel ; Porter vs.Wagner. O.
Of parol contract; Ewing, et al. vs. Richards
et al. (Holmes Co. C. P.) Ohio.........

462
STARE DECISES—Commissioners of appeal,

law of case; Burns vs. Led better. Tex...... 459
STATUTE-

Declaration of former, same as embodied

with; State ex rel.vs. O.S. & S.O. Home. 0. 234
Stato not bound by general; Ohio ex rel. vs.
Board of Public Works; Ohio.........

01
STATUTE OF FRAUDS-See Contract.)

Verbal promise to compensate either in land

or money within; Howard, administrator,
vs. Brower.
Obio.......

305
Action for damages applies as well to under-

ground as surface; Williams vs. Pomeroy.O. 406
Effect judgment rendered before revise code

took effect; Lafferty vs. Shinn. Ohio...... 441
Effect on surety, by payment of principal;

Glick, administrator, vs. Crist. Ohio......... 270
Must be specially pleaded; State vs. McIn-
tire.

62€
Runs against township trustees holding titles

to land ; Trustees Oxford Tp. vs. Columbia
et al. Obio.......

471
Does not apply during non-residence ; State
vs. McIntire. Iowa....

628

.................

227
608
113
323

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

SURETY-

Discharged by variance of term by princi-

pal without knowledge; Boling vs. Young

Ohio..........
Name of, not appearing in body of, not affect-

ing validity; McLain vs. Simington. Ohio.
On prontissory note, released by concealment

of facts; (onger vs. Bean et al. Iowa.......
SURVEY-Effect of fraudulent; under Virginia

Military District Allotinent. C'oan vs. Flagg.

Ohio.......
TAX-License for dogs, not; Cole is. Hall, col-

lector. Ill.....
Amount treasurer of county stands charged

with under Act April 19, 1881; Ohio ex rel.

vs. Staley, treasurer. Ohio..........
TAXATION-

Offices of corporation regarded as residence

for purposes of; Pelton, treasurer, vs North-

ern Transportation Company. Ohio...........
Unequal “uniform rule" construed ; Wag-

ner, treasurer, vs. Loomis et al. Obio......
TENANT ÎN COMMOM-Where taking as, under

will; Corwine vs. Mace. Ohio......
TELEGRAPH-

Cipher messages ; Western Union Tel, Co.vs.

Griswold and Dunhain. Ohio........
Mistake in message; stipulation in printed

matter no excuse for negligence.....
Where right to exclusive business not ac-
quired;

Marietta & Cin. R’y Co. vs. West.
Union Tel. Co. et al. Ohio.......
THIEVES, PICKPOCKETS AND WATCH STUF-

FERS_Right of cities and villages to pun-

ish; Moran, Sup't. vs. Nolte. Obio......
THREATS—Mere, not defense for taking life;

Oder vs. Commonwealth. Ky .........
TITLE-Equitable only by 99 years lease, renewa-

ble forever, attested by one witness ; Abbott

vs. Bosworth. Ohio......

[blocks in formation]

655

108

559 49

297

149

538 637 655

650

inan.

661

289

648

57

577

128

336

204

TRADE MARK—Sale of factory, when it carries;

Pepper vs. Labrot. U. S................... TRIAI-Order of ; (, 'endant beginning and con

cluding, offering of testimony ; Dille vs.

Lovell et al. 'Ohio......
TRIAL BY JURY...
TRESPASS (See Statute Limitations)

Mere silence of, in presence of, waives

nothing; Leber vs. Minneapolis & N. W.

R'y Co. Minn ....... Use of path across railroad by public for years, not; Phila. & Reading R'y vs. Trout

Pa..... TRUST–Verbal, enforced when partially per

formed; Robbins vs. Robbins. N. Y.. TRUSTEES–Of wiil-Powers under; Hamilton

et al. vs. Rodgers et al. Ohio.......... TURNPIKE-Various acts relating to; Art. II,

Sec. 26 constitution ; State ex rel. vs. Ports

mouth & C. Turnpike Co. Ohio........ ULTRA VIRES

Contracts not, binding corporation for fixed

time; Cleveland & Mahoning R’y Co. vs.

Himrod Furnace ('o. Ohio..... Stipulations in consideration; void stipula

tions ; Marietta & Cin. R'y Co. vs. West.

Union Tel. Co. Ohio...... UNDUE INFLUENCE-In execution of deed;

when voluntarily executed; Cherbonpier vs.

Evitts. Md.... UNIVERSAL MARRIAGE.. USAGES—(See Trespass)

Governing contract as to delivery ; Swift's

Iron and Steel Works vs. Dewey Vance &

Co. Ohio....... USURY_Statutes of Ohio do not effect National

Banks; Huntingdon vs. Krejci et al. (Cuy

aboga C. P.) Ohio...... VALUATION_Taxation"Uniform Rule;" Wag

ner, treasurer, vs. Loomis et al. Ohio..... VERDICT—"Guilty as in manner and form in

dicted;" Eldredge vs. State, Ohio...... VENDOR AND VENDEE_Creditor of fraudu

lent vendor; title to property; Ohio ('oal Co.

vs. Davenport. Ohio.......

219

104

436

VERY IMPORTANT.
VIRGINIA MILITARY LANDS

Effect Act May 27, 1880; Coan vs. Flagg. 0.
Editorial
Patents-Evidence of record-Patents sub-

sequent to March 3, 1857, void. (Norvill's

Case.) U. S..
Informal letter to ress....

Editorial
WAGES-See Municipal Officer.)
WAIVER-

Defect in summons, by filing motion; Handy

et al. vs. Ætna Ins, Co. Ohio......... Suit against administrator before presenting

clain ; effect waiver. Pepper vs. Sidener.

Ohio....
When presumption of; Moran vs. Abbey &

Heffner. Cal...
WAREHOUSE RECEIPT—When void; execution

to creditor ; Thorne vs. First Nat'l Bank

Wilmington, Ohio.......... WARRANTY

Defeot of, known to both parties; McCormick

vs. Kelly. Minn..... Difference between and misrepresentation ; Com. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. vs. Huntzinger's

Pa... WHO IS LIABLE?... WILL

Acts of widow as acceptance of; Millikin,
administrator, vs. Welliver, administrator.

Ohio
Construction of ; Collier vs. Grimesey. Obio..
Construction of; Hamilton et al. vs. Rodgers

et al. Obio......
Dividing land into parcels, without indicat-
ing dividing line; bequest construed; Cor-

wine vs. Mace. Ohio....

Words conveying fee; Piatt vs. Sinton. Ohio WIDOW'S ALLOWANCE_$300 in lieu of home

stead; In re estate of R. Martin, Ohio........ WORD (A) TO OUR READERS... WRONGFULLY CAUSING DEATH-Action for,

abates at death of wrong doer; Russell vs.Sun

bury. Ohio........

use.

46 373

[blocks in formation]

Ohio Law Journal.

page 261.

We have received from the publishers, Wil

liam Gould & Son, Law Booksellers and PubCOLUMBUS, OHIO, : : : AUGUST 18, 1881.

lishers. Albany N. Y., their Catalogue of Law

Books.
PERSONAL.

A catalogue of law books may not be deemed

an important publication, and, ordinarily, is not. -Counselor Seth Weldy, of Logan, paid us a flying

In this case, however, we find a catalogue which visit, while passing through the city a few days ago. must have required an immense amount of labor

-Judge J. S. Brasee, of Lancastor, was in the city. to prepare, and is correspondingly valuable to Monday last on professional business.

attorneys or legal writers. -J. Wheeler Lowe, of the Circleville bar, was in the

The nucleus to this extensive list was precity last week, on business connected with the Supreme Court.

pared and used by Hon. N. C. Moak in his lec

tures before the students of Albany Law School, ERRATA

Class of 1880-81, and entitled: Books, their SeBy an inadvertent head put on the “Table of lection and Use. By the request of the pubCases reported in full," during the past year,

lishers, however, the book was enlarged to its which appeared last week, the belief may obtain

present size, 400 pages, by the addition of much that no further index will be furnished. This

valuable matter prepared by .J. T. Cook, Esq. is error. We will prepare a full index of all

Fifty pages of the book are devoted to the abthings contained in the Law Journal during breviations used in citing elementary works the year ending with Aug. 11. This will be

This will be upon the law. This portion is of the greatest prepared and printed as soon as possible.

value for reference. Thirty pages follow giving We have also omitted from the table of Cases

the abbreviations used in citing English and reported in full, Buckingham v Buckingham,

American Reports and Legal Periodicals. The Also on page 536 in speaking of the

rest of the book is made up of alphabetical lists cost of obtaining copies of the opinions, we wrote

of Elementary legal works; of all American that they could only be obtained by paying Reports; of all American periodical and miscel"Copying rates&c. The fiendish compositor

laneous Reports; of all noted trials, the proceedmade it "losing rates" and steadfastly refused to

ings of which have been published; sketches of amend. Now, however, that he is no more, we

all the English courts; full lists of English Resucceed in getting it to read as we penned it.

we penned it. ports; Irish, Scotch, Indian, Canadian, Mauritius,

New Zealand and other Reports; making a volume NEW BOOKS.

of the greatest interest and value. In addition to

all this matter we note on page 3, certain "rules NEVADA REPORTS, Vol. 15, has been received

for citations," which are of such value that a from the publishers, Messrs. A. L. Bancroft & Co., simple notice will not do them justice. We will San Francisco. This volume contains fifty-publish them in full next week. eight cases decided during 1880. Many important decisions concerning, the úsual range of

OLIVER'S CONVEYANCING. matters litigated, we find therein, the more valuable and novel being as to Evidence, Libel, and

Benjamin Lynde Oliver, the author of Oliver's Partnership in Mining Rights. In Criminal Law,

Precedents in Real und Personal Actions, and of Conwe note nothing unusual. Various questions as veyancing-an earlier edition-is well known to the sufficiency of indictments, the compe, throughout the East as a recognized authority in

, tency of jurors, and the admissibility of testi- matters pertaining to the interpretation of written

instruments. Both his books have been received mony, are passed upon, but no new rules are deduced.

by the profession with favor most marked, and The mechanical execution of the book is ex

have long held an undisturbed place in the cataceptionally good. This, however, is easily ac

logue of really good works. counted for. Messrs. Bancroft & Co: produce no

When we consider that a very large part of other kind of books.

the litigation thronging our courts and filling

our reports, is the direct outgrowth of unskillful Hon 0. H. BROWNING, one of the most Distinguished

attempts at writing deeds, wills and contracts, lawyers of the State of Illinois, died at his home in Quincy, Thursday evening of last week, in the 76th year

we must be surprised that greater attention is not paid to securing a better general knowledge

of his age,

« PreviousContinue »