Shakespeare and the Rival Playwrights, 1600-1606
David Farley-Hills argues that Shakespeare did not work in splendid isolation, but responded as any other playwright to the commercial and artistic pressures of his time. In this book he offers an interpretation of seven of Shakespeare's plays in the light of pressures exerted by his major contemporary rivals. The plays discussed are Hamlet, Troilus and Cressida, All's Well That Ends Well, Othello, Measure for Measure, Timon of Athens, and King Lear.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action All’s allegorical ambiguity Angelo Antonio’s Revenge Apemantus audience audience’s Basilikon Doron Bassiolo Ben Jonson Bertram Blackfriars Chapman character Christian Claudio clear comedy comic concerned contrast Cordelia death Dekker Desdemona divine dramatic dramaturgical Duke Duke’s earlier edition Elizabethan emotional essentially evil expression father fool foolish Gentleman Usher Globe God’s Goneril Hamlet Hecatommithi Hector Helena hero hero’s Heywood’s human Iago ibid ingratitude Isabella Jacobean James James’s Jonson judgement Killed With Kindness King Lear King’s Lear’s London Lord Lust’s Dominion male man’s Marston McIlwain Measure for Measure Middleton’s moral mythic nature Othello Pandarus pattern Paul’s Phoenix play’s playwrights plot popular presented psychological quarto reference response rivals role satire scene seems Sejanus sense sexual Shakespeare Shakespeare’s play Sir Giles Goosecap soliloquy spiritual stage story Strozza suggests theatre theatrical theme thou Timon of Athens tragedy Troilus and Cressida Trojan University Press Vincentio wife