 | Parliamentary practice - 1826 - 220 pages
...could not afterwards be permitted to strike out A and insert B. The mover of B should have notified while the insertion of A was under debate, that he...paragraph, comprehending A, provided the coherence to be struck out, be so substantial as to make this effectively a different proposition. For then it... | |
 | Parliamentary practice - 1826 - 228 pages
...could not afterwards be permitted to strike out A and insert B. The mover of B should have notified while the insertion of A was under debate, that he would move to insert B. In which case, those \vho preferred it, would join in rejecting A. After A is inserted, however, it may be moved to strike... | |
 | Joel Barlow Sutherland - Parliamentary practice - 1830 - 404 pages
...could not afterwards be permitted to strike out A, and insert B. The mover of B should have notified, while the insertion of A was under debate, that he...those who preferred it would join in rejecting A. * In the case of a division of the question and a decision against striking out, I advance doubtingly... | |
 | Charles Sitgreaves - 1836 - 380 pages
...insert A, it could not afterwards be permitted to strike out A and insert B : after A is inserted, it may be moved to strike out a portion of the original...paragraph, comprehending A, provided the coherence to be struck out be so substantial as to make this effectively a different proposition."—Jefferson's... | |
 | Constitutions - 1837 - 240 pages
...could not afterwards be permitted to strike out A, and insert B. The mover of B should have notified, while the insertion of A was under debate, that he...paragraph, comprehending A, provided the coherence to be struck out be so substantial as to make this effectively a different proposition. For then it... | |
 | Thomas Jefferson - 1837 - 202 pages
...could not afterwards be permitted to strike out A and insert B. The mover of B should have notified, while the insertion of A was under debate, that he...those who preferred it would join in rejecting A. * In a case of a division of the question, and a decision against striking out, I advance, doubtingly,... | |
 | Joel Barlow Sutherland - Parliamentary practice - 1838 - 456 pages
...could not afterwards be permitted to strike out A, and insert 6. The mover of B should have notified, while the insertion of A was under debate, that he...paragraph, comprehending A, provided the coherence to be struck out be so substantial as to make this effectively a different proposition. For then it... | |
 | Joel Barlow Sutherland - 1841 - 560 pages
...could not after" wards be permitted to strike out A, and insert B. The mover of B should have notified, while the insertion of A was under debate, that he...paragraph, comprehending A, provided the coherence to be struck out be so substantial as to make this effectively a different proposition. For then it... | |
 | Joel Barlow Sutherland - 1841 - 530 pages
...permitted to strike out A, and insert B. The mover of B should have notified, while the insort ion of A was under debate, that he would move to insert...paragraph, comprehending A, provided the coherence to be struck out be so substantial as to make this effectively a different proposition. For then it... | |
 | New York (State). Secretary's Office - New York (State) - 1853 - 476 pages
...could not afterwards be permitted to strike out A and insert B. The mover of B should have notified, while the insertion of A was under debate, that he...paragraph, comprehending A, provided the coherence to be struck out be so substantial as to make this effectively a different proposition. For then it... | |
| |
But if it had been carried affirmatively to strike out the words and to insert A, it could not afterwards be permitted to strike out A and insert B. The mover of B should have notified, while the insertion of A was under debate, that he would move to... 
