Some Necessary Questions of the Play: A Stage-centered Analysis of Shakespeare's HamletIn "For the Purposes of Defense," historian Gene A. Smith examines the politics and ideology of the fleet of small shallow-draft vessels commissioned by President Thomas Jefferson that dominated the United States Navy during the first two decades of the nineteenth century. Designed to maneuver and fight in coastal waters, the vessels had limited ability on the open seas. They were considered defensive rather than offensive craft and have become the focus of the white-water (coastal) - blue-water (seagoing) controversy as well as the navalist-antinavalist debate of the period. When examining the fleet, scholars have charged that Jefferson opposed the navy. He did not, although his most famous quote refers to "the ruinous folly of a navy." Instead, Jefferson was an economy-minded, astute politician who viewed the gunboats as part of a political-military policy rather than a naval program in itself. Gunboats were an economic and political alternative to the exorbitant costs of a blue-water navy. Their perceived initial costs would be small, and when not in use they could be hauled up and protected under cover, eliminating costly maintenance. Staffing them by a naval militia would further lessen their costs. Additionally, they were a defensive weapon that provided few opportunities for incidents at sea that might provoke war. They were also useful in revenue enforcement, suppressing piracy along the coastal frontier, checking the illegal slave trade and smuggling, as well as other nontraditional uses. Moreover, gunboat construction provided a unique political opportunity for the Jefferson administration. Gunboats could be built throughout the country, allowing the distribution of contracts beyond the regular centers of naval activity and to those areas supporting Republican politics. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 16
Page 15
... role of such a cultural counter in contemporary struggles over cultural hegemony . In my approach to Hamlet then , whatever explicit conflicts with alter- native critical stances may appear , my primary contention remains INTRODUCTION 15.
... role of such a cultural counter in contemporary struggles over cultural hegemony . In my approach to Hamlet then , whatever explicit conflicts with alter- native critical stances may appear , my primary contention remains INTRODUCTION 15.
Page 41
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 57
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 58
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 65
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Contents
13 | |
Space and Time | 25 |
Space and Scrutiny in Hamlet | 27 |
Taking Up the Past Hamlet and Time | 47 |
Theatrical Text | 67 |
Put Your Discourse into Some Frame Hamlet and the Uses of Wit | 69 |
About My Brains Hamlets Soliloquies | 91 |
Theatrical Expectations | 109 |
Body Actor and Character in Hamlet | 111 |
Issues of Culture and Genre | 131 |
Notes | 151 |
163 | |
169 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action actor Amleth antic disposition Atheist's Tragedy audience avenger awareness becomes behavior bodily body Bucknell University Calderwood character Claudius Claudius's closet scene comedy concern conscience consciousness contemplation context crime critical cultural death of Polonius defined Denmark dialogue discourse disruption distance dramatic text dreams Elam Elizabethan Elsinore emotional evoke examines expectations experience father feeling Fortinbras genre Geoffrey Hartman Gertrude Gertrude's gesture ghost graveyard Hamlet Hamlet's soliloquies Hamlet's wit Horatio human humor joke King King's Laertes language laughter madness means Merleau-Ponty Metadrama metaphor metatheatrical mimesis mother Mousetrap play murder myth mythic narrative norms observation Ophelia past perceived performance Phenomenology of Perception philosophical play's players plot Polonius presence Princeton protagonist psychological relationship Renaissance representation response revenge tragedy rhetorical role Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Ruth Thompson seems Semiotics sense sexual Shakespeare significant soliloquy speech stage space suggests textual theater theatrical theory tion University Press verbal words