Lawyers' Reports Annotated, Book 42Lawyers' Co-operative Publishing Company, 1913 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 5
... evidence on ac- count of ambiguity in the contract . The opinion in the Traynham Case does not make the ground of the admission of such evidence clear . In Hicks v . Kenan , 139 N. C. 337 , 51 S. E. 941 , and Roberts v . Burton , 14 Vt ...
... evidence on ac- count of ambiguity in the contract . The opinion in the Traynham Case does not make the ground of the admission of such evidence clear . In Hicks v . Kenan , 139 N. C. 337 , 51 S. E. 941 , and Roberts v . Burton , 14 Vt ...
Page 6
... evidence of the actual intention , the intention as derived from the instrument will govern . Bingham v . Stewart , 13 Minn . 106 , Gil . 96 . N. Y. 1 , 65 N. E. 738 ; Brockway v . Allen , | v . 17 Wend . 40 ( dictum ) ; Hood v . Hallen ...
... evidence of the actual intention , the intention as derived from the instrument will govern . Bingham v . Stewart , 13 Minn . 106 , Gil . 96 . N. Y. 1 , 65 N. E. 738 ; Brockway v . Allen , | v . 17 Wend . 40 ( dictum ) ; Hood v . Hallen ...
Page 21
... evidence might be introduced of a different intention . It is stated in Keeley Brewing Co. v . Neu- hauer Decorating Co. 194 Ill . 580 , 62 N. E. 923 , that a proposition written on the sta- tionery of a decorating company , containing ...
... evidence might be introduced of a different intention . It is stated in Keeley Brewing Co. v . Neu- hauer Decorating Co. 194 Ill . 580 , 62 N. E. 923 , that a proposition written on the sta- tionery of a decorating company , containing ...
Page 30
... evidence is not competent to explain the intention of the parties . Williams v . Sec- ond Nat . Bank , 83 Ind . 237 . Where a mortgage given by an Odd Fel- lows ' Association concluded by stating that the party of the first part ...
... evidence is not competent to explain the intention of the parties . Williams v . Sec- ond Nat . Bank , 83 Ind . 237 . Where a mortgage given by an Odd Fel- lows ' Association concluded by stating that the party of the first part ...
Page 31
Parol evidence is admissible in an action on a promissory note reading , " I promise A promissory note reading , " we promise to pay , " etc. , and signed " C. S. , J. S. Gen. to pay , " and signed “ G. H. C. , Pres . Can - Manag . and ...
Parol evidence is admissible in an action on a promissory note reading , " I promise A promissory note reading , " we promise to pay , " etc. , and signed " C. S. , J. S. Gen. to pay , " and signed “ G. H. C. , Pres . Can - Manag . and ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adverse possession agent agreement alleged amount appears appellant appellee assignee assignment assignor Asso authority Back Bay Fens Bank bind bond cause of action certificate claim contract corporation counsel County court damages deceased deed defendant defendant's demurrer duty eminent domain executed executor fact feet heirs held indorsed injury intention interest Iowa judgment jury land lease lien Linderman Mass maturing ment Minn mortgage N. Y. Supp negligence notes secured officer opinion owner paid party payment personal obligation personally liable plaintiff plaintiff in error principal priority probate promise to pay promissory note reading purchase question railroad company reason record recover rule signatures the words signed signers statute statute of frauds suit supra telegraph company tenant testify thereof tion tort tract trial trustees WARD COUNTY witness
Popular passages
Page 341 - That no man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested or burthened, in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer on account of his religious opinions or belief; but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion, and that the same shall in no wise diminish, enlarge or affect their civil capacities.
Page 156 - We may lay it down as a broad general principle that wherever one of two innocent persons must suffer by the acts of a third, he who has enabled such third person to occasion the loss must sustain it
Page 306 - That in actions by or against executors, administrators or guardians, in which judgment may be rendered for or against them, neither party shall be allowed to testify against the other, as to any transaction with, or statement by, the testator, intestate or ward, unless called to testify thereto by the opposite party, or required to testify thereto by the court.
Page 293 - That no creditor proving his debt or claim shall be allowed to maintain any suit at law or in equity therefor against the bankrupt...
Page 424 - The company will not be liable for damages or statutory penalties in any case where the claim is not presented in writing within sixty days after the message is filed with the -Company for transmission.
Page 175 - ... if any change other than by the death of an insured, take place in the interest, title or possession of the subject of insurance (except change of occupants without increase of hazard) whether by legal process or judgment or by voluntary act of the insured, or otherwise...
Page 326 - ... personal transaction or communication between the witness and the deceased person or lunatic except where the executor, administrator, survivor, committee or person so deriving title or interest, is examined in his own behalf or the testimony of the lunatic or deceased person is given in evidence concerning the same transaction or communication.
Page 266 - ... to be recovered in an action in the name of the State of Indiana on the relation of the auditor of state...
Page 293 - That nothing in this act contained shall be construed to annul, destroy, or impair any lawful rights of married women, or minors, or any liens, mortgages, or other securities on property, real or personal, which may be valid by the laws of the States respectively, and which are not inconsistent with the provisions of the second and fifth sections of this act.
Page 341 - No public money or property shall ever be appropriated, applied, or used, directly or indirectly, for the use, benefit, or support of any sect, church, denomination, sectarian institution, or system of religion, or for the use, benefit or support of any priest, preacher, minister, or other religious teacher or dignitary as such...