prince; under whom, therefore, it is easy But we have the but consider, in who are the husbandry and building: and in this whole chapter, and in the preceding one, S. Paul takes great pains to set forth that they, the clergy, have the spirit of God, without which no man searcheth the deep things of God. And he concludeth the chapter with this verse: 'For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? mind of Christ.' Now if we do humane probability and reason, the powers Christ leaves to his church in the gospel, and St. Paul explains so distinctly afterwards, we cannot think that our Saviour said all these things to no purpose: and pray consider, on the other side, that those who resist the truth, and will not submit to his church, draw their arguments from implications, and far-fetched interpretations, at the same time that they deny plain and positive words; which is so great a disingenuity, that 'tis not almost to be thought that they can believe themselves. Is there any other foundation of the protestant church, but that, if the civil magistrate please, he may call such of the clergy as he thinks fit for his turn at that time; and turn the church either to presbytery, independency, or, indeed, what he pleases? This was the way of our pretended reformation here in England; and, by the same rule and authority, it may be altered into as many more shapes and forms as there are fancies in mens heads. "This is a true copy of a paper written by the late king, my brother, in his own hand, which I found in his closeta." * Published by his majesty's command. Lond. Printed by Henry Hills, printer to the king's most excellent majesty, for his household and chapel, 1686. to believe, popery was highly favoured, : These papers, as it may be supposed, did not long remain without answers. Stillingfleet and Burnet, able controvertists, made their remarks on them. The latter of whom expresses himself about them in the following manner:-" I pay all the reverence that is due to a crown'd head, even in ashes, to which I will 'never be wanting: far less am I capable of suspecting the royal attestation that accompanies them; of the truth of which, I take it for granted, no man doubts. But I must crave leave to tell you, that, I am confident, the late king only copied them, and they are not of his composing for as they have nothing of that free air with which he expressed himself, so there is a con"texture in them that does not look like a prince: and the beginning of the first shews it was the effect of a conversation, and was to be communicated to another: so that I am apt to think they were composed by another, and were so well relished by the late king, that he thought fit to keep them, in order to his examining them more particularly; and that he was prevailed with to copy them, lest a paper of that nature might have been made a crime, if it had been found about him written by another hand and I could name one or two persons, who as they were able enough to compose such papers, so had power enough over his spirit to engage him to copy them, and to put themselves out of danger by restoring the original". He, afterwards, takes notice of his having had the honour to discourse copiously of these matters with the late king himself, and of his majesty's having proposed to him some of the particulars he found in those papers. : * Burnet's Collection of Papers, p. 188. 4to. Lond. 1689. This is explained more fully in the "History of his own Time."- "The two papers found in his strong box," says the bishop, "concerning religion, and afterwards published by his brother, looked like study and reasoning. Tennison told me, he saw the original in Pepy's hand, to whom king James trusted them for some time. They were interlined in several places: and the interlinings seemed to be writ in a hand different from that in which the papers were writ. But he was not so well acquainted with the king's hand, as to make any judgment in the matter, whether they were writ by him or not. All that knew him, when they read them, did, without any sort of doubting, conclude that he never composed them: for he never read the scriptures, nor laid things together, further than to turn them to a jest, or for some lively expression. These papers were probably writ either by lord Bristol, or by lord Aubigny, who knew the secret of his religion, and gave him those papers as abstracts of some discourses they had with him on those heads, to keep him fixed to them. And it is very probable that they, apprehending their danger if any such papers had been found about him writ in their hand, might prevail with him to copy them out himself, tho' his laziness that way made it certainly no easy thing to bring him to give himself so much trouble. He had talked over a great part of them to myself: so that as soon as I saw them I remembred his expressions, and perceived that he had made himself master of the argument as far as those papers could carry him."Lord Halifax judges, "he might write these papers. Though," adds he, "neither his temper nor education made him very fit to be an author; yet, in this case * Burnet, vol. I. p. 614. (a known topick, so often repeated), he might write it all himself, and yet not one word of it his own, That church's argument doth so agree with men unwilling to take pains, the temptation of putting an end to all the trouble of enquiring is so great, that it must be very strong reason that can resist. The king had only his meer natural faculties, without any acquisi tions to improve them: so that it is no wonder, if an argument, which gave such ease and relief to his mind, made such an impression, that, with thinking often on it (as men are apt to do of every thing they like), he might, by the effect chiefly of his memory, put together a few lines with his own hand, without any help at the time; in which there was nothing extraordinary, but that one so little inclined to write at all, should prevail with himself to do it with the solemnity of a ca‐ suista."- Whoever was the writer, the papers have very little merit: nor will any one pay attention to the arguments contained in them, who has sense enough to perceive, that every honest inquirer after truth is infallibly sure of being right, with respect to himself. Every mans reason," says Bolingbroke, "is every mans oracle. This oracle is best consulted in the silence of retirement: and when we have so consulted, whatever the decision be, whether in favour of our prejudices or against them, we must rest satisfied: since nothing can be more certain than this, that he who follows that guide in the search of truth, as that was given him to lead him to it, will have a much better plea to make, whenever or wherever he may be called to account, than he who has resigned himself, either deliberately or inadvertently, to any authority upon earth b b." 66 a Halifax's Character of K. Charles II. p. 11. Bolingbroke's Letters on the Study and Use of History, vol. II, p. 220. 8vo. Lond, 1752, and the professors of it cherished and encouraged; contrary to the sense, and re 10 Popery was favoured, and its professors cherished and encouraged.] That this is no false accusation, will appear by the most unquestionable authorities.Father Walsh, in his "Preparation to his Apology touching the Oath of Supremacy," printed at London, 1684, tells us," that, about the year 1661, one Sunday morning, very early, being sent for by one of the first lords of the kingdom, amongst other things, this great personage spoke to him as followeth : Father Walsh, now is the time for you to reap the fruit of your long painful endeavours, your fidelity and patience, and the expectations you have had of us for many years. I can tell you, that we are now going to do what you have laboured so much for: viz. we are going to abolish all the laws which have been made in this kingdom against catholics, and procure them the public exercise of their religion; admission into all offices, civil and military; and a dispensation for taking the oath of supremacy.We shall manage so, that they shall have forty in London, where they may say mass undisturbed for the future.We are going to chuse some members of the house of lords to demand the abolition of the laws against Roman catholics, before the present parliament rises.—But because the presbyterian members will oppose such a measure, pretending that the safety of the state is incompatible with the toleration of a party that owns no other superior but the pope :-Therefore, my good father, you must without delay, in going from house to house, engage all the catholics to promise to take the oath of allegiance, which will stop the mouths of the presby |