in Charles's strong box, and in his closet,

the Monday, he was no sooner recovered of his fit, but his trusty loving brother, our now most gracious so vereign, fearing a relapse, put him in mind of his soul; which advice he immediately embraced, and desired no time might be lost in the execution of it. Where upon Mr. Huddleston was commanded to attend inces santly thereabouts. But the great affairs of the nation coming perpetually before them, time could not possibly be found till Thursday. But the king, finding his natural strength decay, commanded, of his own accord, all to retire out of the room; telling them that he had something to communicate to his brother. Then Mr. Huddleston being brought in, that great work was done, and with that exactness, that there was nothing omitted either necessary or decent: and, as Mr. Huddleston himself has told me, by a particular instance of God's grace, the king was as ready and apt in making his confession, and all other things, as if he had been brought up a catholick all his life-time: and from that moment till eight of the clock the next day, at which time his speech left him, he was heard to say little but begging Almighty God's pardon for all offences, and the like: so that we may joyfully say, God have mercy of his soul, and make him eternally participant of his kingdom of heaven."-There, probably, was no occasion for God's grace to make "the king ready and apt in making his confession, and all other things." Use and custom had rendered them habitual; and the ease he had found in them, amidst all his crimes, rendered him, we may well suppose, desirous, at this time, of performing them; that he might have the mighty

* See Appendix.

and written in his own hand.

These,

comfort of sacerdotal prayers and absolution, and, thereby a right to the kingdom of heaven.-O Superstition! thou subduer of the old, and young; of the ignorant, and men of understanding; how great is thy power, how amazing thy empire, over the minds of men! Who could have thought that a prince, so abandoned as Charles; so sensible, and penetrating; so capable of seeing the ridicule of nonsense and absurdity, and exposing them to standers-by: who could think that this man, who had consented to law which incapacitated all persons, who should affirm that he was a papist, from bearing office; and had even permitted persons to be punished very severely, for professing that mode of belief: who, I say, could think that this very man should be under its influence; and imagine, the wise and good God would be moved by tricks and fooleries, to forgive such as never strived to resemble him! But he loved not truth, or virtue. By vice, his understanding was darkened: and he had long lost the only sure guard against delusion, honesty and integrity.

9

Copies of two letters, found in the king's strong box, written in his own hand.] The first paper:

"The discourse we had the other day, I hoped, satisfied you, in the main, that Christ can have but one church here upon earth; and I believe, that it is as visible as that the scripture is in print, that none can be that church, but that which is called the Roman catholick church. I think you need not trouble yourself with entering into that ocean of particular disputes, when the main, and, in truth, the only question is, where that church is which we profess to believe in the

a Stat. 13 Car. II. c. 1.

as they may be a curiosity to many of my

two creeds? We declare there, to believe one catholic and apostolical church; and it is not left to every phantastical mans head to believe as he pleases, but to the church, to whom Christ hath left the power upon earth to govern us in matters of faith, who made these creeds for our directions. It were a very irrational thing to make laws for a country, and leave it to the inhabitants to be the interpreters and judges of those laws: for then every man will be his own judge, and, by consequence, no such thing as either right or wrong. Can we therefore suppose, that God Almighty would > leave us at those uncertainties, as to give us a rule to go by, and leave every man to be his own judge? I do ask any ingenuous man, whether it be not the same thing to follow our own phancy, or to interpret the scripture by it? I would have any man shew me, where the power of deciding matters of faith is given to every particular man. Christ left his power to his church, even to forgive sins in heaven; and left his spirit with them, which they exercised after his resurrection: first, by his apostles, in these creeds; and, many years after, by the council of Nice, where that creed was made that is called by that name; and by the power which they had received from Christ, they were the judges even of the scripture itself many years after the apostles, which books were canonical and which were not. And if they had this power then, I desire to know, how they came to lose it, and by what authority men separate themselves from that church? The only pretence I ever heard of was, because the church had failed in wresting and interpreting the scripture contrary to the true sense and meaning of it, and that they have imposed articles of faith upon us which are not to be

readers, I will give below in the note.

warranted by God's word. I desire to know who is to be judge of that: whether the whole church, the succession whereof has continued to this day without interruption; or particular men, who have raised schisms for their own advantage?

"This is a true copy of a paper I found in the late king my brothers strong box, written in his own hand.

The Second Paper:

(6 JAMES R."

"It is a sad thing to consider what a world of heresies are crept into this nation. Every man thinks himself as competent a judge of the scriptures, as the very apostles themselves: and 'tis no wonder that it should be so; since that part of the nation, which looks most like a church, dares not bring the true arguments against the other sects, for fear they should be turned against themselves, and confuted by their own arguments. The Church of England (as 'tis call'd) would fain have it thought, that they are the judges in matters spiritual, and yet dare not say positively that there is no appeal from them: for either they must say that they are infallible (which they cannot pretend to), or confess that what they decide in matters of conscience, is no further to be followed than it agrees with every mans private judgment. If Christ did leave a church here upon earth, and we were all once of that church; how? and by what authority did we separate from that church? If the power of interpreting of scripture be in every mans brain, what need have we of a church or church-men? To what purpose then did our Saviour, after he had given his apostles power to bind and

VOL. V.

F

Such was the personal character of this

loose in heaven and earth, add to it, that he would be with them even to the end of the world? These words were not spoken parabolically, or by way of figure. Christ was then ascending into his glory, and left his power with his church even to the end of the world. We have had, these hundred years past, the sad effects of denying to the church that power, in matters spiritual, without an appeal. What country can subsist in peace or quiet, where there is not a supream judge from whence there can be no appeal? Can there be any justice done where the offenders are their own judges, and equal interpreters of the law with those that are appointed to administer justice? This is our case here in England in matters spiritual; for the protestants are not of the Church of England, as 'tis the true church from whence there can be no appeal; but because the discipline of that church is conformable at that present to their fancies, which, as soon as it shall contradict or vary from, they are ready to embrace or join with the next congregation of people whose discipline and worship agrees with their opinion at that time: so that, according to this doctrine, there is no other church, nor interpreter of scripture, but that which lies in every mans giddy brain. I desire to know, therefore, of every serious considerer of these things, whether the great work of our salvation ought to depend on such a sandy foundation as this? Did Christ ever say to the civil magistrate (much less to the people), that he would be with them to the end of the world? Or, did he give them the power to forgive sins? St. Paul tells the Corinthians, Ye are Gods husbandry, ye are Gods building; we are labourers with God. This shews who are the labourers, and