A roll call was demanded on the amendment. On the question, Shall the amendment be adopted? The yeas were: Senators Allyn, Arthaud, Bachman, Bishop, Brooks, Bruce, Courtright, Craig, Crawford, Crossley, Dowell, Griswold, Harper, Hartshorn, Hazelton, Lambert, Lister, Maytag, Molsberry, Smith of Des Moines, Smith of Mitchell, Spaulding, Tallman, Whipple, Winne, Young of Washington-26. The nays were: Senators Alexander, Ball, Blanchard, Fitchpatrick, Hayward, Hobart, Hogue, Hopkins, Hubbard, Junkin, Lewis, Mardis, Porter, Wilson-14. Absent or not voting: Senators Brighton, Classen, Garst, Harriman, Healy, Lyons, Moffit, Townsend, Trewin, Young of Lee-10. So the amendment prevailed. Senator Hubbard moved to amend section 4 by striking out the words and figures "twenty-five (25)," and insert the words and figures "fifty (50)" in lieu thereof. Lost. Senator Hubbard moved to amend section 5 by striking out the word "street" wherever it occurs in section 5 of the bill. Carried. Senator Crossley offered the following amendment, and moved its adoption. I move to strike out section 5 of the bill. A roll call was demanded on the amendment. On the question, Shall the amendment be adopted? The yeas were: Senators Arthaud, Crossley, Moffit, Wilson, Young of Lee-5. The nays were: Senators Alexander, Allyn, Bishop, Blanchard, Brooks, BruceClassen, Courtright, Craig, Crawford, Dowell, Fitchpatrick, Gris, wold, Harper, Harriman, Hayward, Hazleton, Hobart, Hopkins Hubbard, Junkin, Lewis, Lister, Lyons, Mardis, Maytag, Porter, Smith of Des Moines, Smith of Mitchell, Spaulding, Tallman. Whipple, Young of Washington-33. Absent or not voting: Senators Bachman, Ball, Brighton, Garst, Hartshorn, Healy, Hogue, Lambert, Molsberry, Townsend, Trewin, Winne-12. So the amendment was lost. Senator Ball offered the following amendment to section 4, and moved its adoption: Amend section 4, by inserting between the words “any” and “railway”, in the sixth line of said section, the words "such street". Senator Hazelton moved to amend the amendment by striking out the word "street". A roll call was demanded. On the question, Shall the amendment offered by Senator Hazelton be adopted? The yeas were: Senators Arthaud, Crawford, Dowell, Griswold, Hartshorn, Hayward, Hazelton, Lister, Moffit, Whipple, Wilson, Young of Washington-12. The nays were: Senators Alexander, Ball, Blanchard, Brighton, Brooks, Bruce, Classen, Courtright, Craig, Crossley, Fitchpatrick, Hogue, Hopkins, Hubbard, Junkin, Lewis, Lyons, Mardis, Maytag, Porter, Young of Lee-21. Absent or not voting: Senators Allyn, Bachman, Bishop, Brighton, Garst, Harper, Harriman, Healy, Hobart, Lambert, Molsberry, Smith of Des Moines, Spaulding, Tallman, Townsend, Trewin, Winne-17. So the amendment offered by Senator Hazelton was lost. On the question, Shall the amendment offered by Senator Ball be adopted? the motion prevailed. Senator Moffit offered the following amendment and moved its adoption. Move to amend section 5 by inserting in the eleventh (11) line of the printed substitute, after the word "consent", the words "signed by the owner." Lost. Senator Moffit offered the following amendment: Strike out of the same line the words "resident owning property," and insert in lieu thereof the words "linear front feet of the property. Lost. Senator Lewis moved the previous question on the amendment and the whole bill. On the question, Shall the main question be now put? the motion prevailed. The bill as amended, was read for information. Senator Blanchard moved that the rule be suspended, and that the bill be considered engrossed and read a third time now, as amended, which motion prevailed, and the bill, as amended, was read a third time. On the question, Shall the bill pass? The yeas were : Senators Alexander, Allyn, Bachman, Ball, Bishop, Blanchard, Brooks, Bruce, Classen, Courtright, Craig, Crawford, Dowell, Fitchpatrick, Griswold, Harper, Harriman, Hartshorn, Hayward, Hazelton, Hobart, Hogue, Hopkins, Hubbard, Junkin, Lambert, Lewis, Lister, Lyons, Mardis, Maytag, Moffit, Molsberry, Porter, Smith of Des Moines, Smith of Mitchell, Spaulding, Whipple, Wilson, Winne, Young of Lee, Young of Washington-42. The nays were: Senators Arthaud, Crossley, Tallman-5. Absent or not voting: Senators Brighton, Garst, Healy, Townsend, Trewin—5. So the bill, having received a constitutional majority, was declared to have passed the Senate and its title agreed to. Senator Garst moved that the Senate do now adjourn. A roll call was demanded. On the question, Shall the Senate adjourn? The yeas were: Senators Bachman, Bishop, Blanchard, Brooks, Bruce, Fitchpatrick, Garst, Hayward, Hubbard, Junkin, Lewis, Lister, Maytag, Porter, Smith of Mitchell, Spaulding, Wilson, Winne, Young of Lee-19. The nays were: Senators Alexander, Allyn, Classen, Courtright, Craig, Crawford, Crossley, Griswold, Harper, Harriman, Hartshorn, Hazelton, Hobart, Hogue, Hopkins, Lambert, Lyons, Mardis, Moffit, Molsberry, Smith of Des Moines, Whipple, Young of Washington-24. Absent or not voting: Senators Arthaud, Ball, Brighton, Dowell, Healy, Townsend, Trewin-7. So the motion to adjourn was lost. Senator Harriman called up the motion filed by him this morning to reconsider the vote whereby House file No. 185 was referred to the committee on Appropriations. Senator Harriman moved to reconsider the vote whereby House file No. 185 was referred to the committee on Appropriations. A roll call was demanded. On the question, Shall the vote whereby House file No. 185 was referred to the committee on Appropriations be reconsidered? The yeas were: Senators Alexander, Allyn, Arthaud, Blanchard, Brooks, Bruce, Classen, Courtright, Craig, Crawford, Crossley, Griswold, Harriman, Hartshorn, Hazelton, Hobart, Hogue, Hopkins, Lambert, Lyons, Mardis, Moffit, Molsberry, Smith of Des Moines, Spaulding, Tallman, Whipple, Young of Washington-28. The nays were: Senators Bachman, Ball, Bishop, Fitchpatrick, Garst, Harper, Hayward, Hubbard, Junkin, Lewis, Lister, Maytag, Porter, Smith of Mitchell, Wilson, Young of Lee-16, Absent or not voting: Senators Brighton, Dowell, Healy, Townsend, Trewin, Winne-6. So the motion to reconsider the vote, whereby House file No. 185 was referred to the committee an Appropriations, prevailed. On motion of Senator Hayward the Senate adjourned. |