Romance in the Ivory Tower: The Rights and Liberty of ConscienceShould the choice to engage in a faculty-student romance be protected or precluded? An argument that the right to choose a romantic partner is a fundamental right of conscience, protected by the U.S Constitution. Allen Ginsberg once declared that "the best teaching is done in bed," but most university administrators would presumably disagree. Many universities prohibit romantic relationships between faculty members and students, and professors who transgress are usually out of a job. In Romance in the Ivory Tower, Paul Abramson takes aim at university policies that forbid relationships between faculty members and students. He argues provocatively that the issue of faculty-student romances transcends the seemingly trivial matter of who sleeps with whom and engages our fundamental constitutional rights. By what authority, Abramson asks, did the university become the arbiter of romantic etiquette among consenting adults? Do we, as consenting adults, have a constitutional right to make intimate choices as long as they do not cause harm? Abramson contends that we do, and bases this claim on two arguments. He suggests that the Ninth Amendment (which states that the Constitution's enumeration of certain rights should not be construed to deny others) protects the "right to romance." And, more provocatively, he argues that the "right to romance" is a fundamental right of conscience--as are freedom of speech and freedom of religion. Campus romances happen. The important question is not whether they should be encouraged or prohibited but whether the choice to engage in such a relationship should be protected or precluded. Abramson argues ringingly that our freedom to make choices--to worship, make a political speech, or fall in love--is fundamental. Rules forbidding faculty-student romances are not only unconstitutional but set dangerous precedents for further intrusion into rights of privacy and conscience. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 11
... least according to Sherry Young , an author- ity in this field , is absolutely not . Young asserts that you'd have to stretch the analogy " to the point of absurdity " to make this fit.11 Why ? Suffice it to say that the institutional ...
... least according to Madison , the fundamental principle of the Con- stitution is to limit the powers of the government , and protect " the great and essential rights of the people . " Consensual romance , I now assert , is invariably one ...
... least according to Madison , religion and conscience were clearly distinct entities . The First Amendment evidently went through many permutations before being ratified . It is therefore perhaps more useful to examine an early draft of ...
Contents
The Romantic Conscience | 25 |
Liberty of Conscience | 81 |
Liberty of Conscience and the U S Constitutional | 121 |
Copyright | |
2 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Romance in the Ivory Tower: The Rights and Liberty of Conscience Paul R. Abramson Limited preview - 2011 |
Romance in the Ivory Tower: The Rights and Liberty of Conscience Paul R. Abramson No preview available - 2011 |