The Roman Clan: The Gens from Ancient Ideology to Modern Anthropology

Front Cover
Cambridge University Press, Mar 9, 2006 - History
The gens, a key social formation in archaic Rome, has given rise to considerable interpretative problems for modern scholarship. In this comprehensive exploration of the subject, Professor Smith examines the mismatch between the ancient evidence and modern interpretative models influenced by social anthropology and political theory. He offers a detailed comparison of the gens with the Attic genos and illustrates, for the first time, how recent changes in the way we understand the genos may impact upon our understanding of Roman history. He develops a concept of the gens within the interlocking communal institutions of early Rome, which touches on questions of land ownership, warfare and the patriciate, before offering an explanation of the role of the gens and the part it might play in modern political theory. This significant work makes an important contribution not only to the study of archaic Rome, but also to the history of ideas.

From inside the book

Contents

Roman gens and Attic genos
1
Modern interpretations
65
Archaeology and the gens
145
page ix
164
The Roman community
169
The Roman curiae
191
8
225
164
231
Warfare in the regal and early Republican periods
281
Explaining the gens
299
99
320
Roman history and the modern world
336
101
351
Select bibliography
363
104
365
108
384

The patricians and the land
235
10
239
xiii
251
21
260
71
272
186
385
6
390
10
391
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 110 - Democracy in government, brotherhood in society, equality in rights and privileges, and universal education, foreshadow the next higher plane of society to which experience, intelligence and knowledge are steadily tending. It will be a revival, in a higher form, of the liberty, equality and fraternity of the ancient gentes.
Page 113 - Monogamy was a great historical advance, but at the same time it inaugurated, along with slavery and private wealth, that epoch, lasting until today, in which every advance is likewise a relative regression, in which the well-being and development of the one group are attained by the misery and repression of the other.
Page 28 - ... gentiles sunt inter se, qui eodem nomine sunt.' non est satis, 'qui ab ingenuis oriundi sunt.' ne id quidem satis est. 'quorum maiorum nemo servitutem servivit.' abest etiam nunc. 'qui capite non sunt deminuti.
Page 262 - Praeteriti senatores quondam in opprobrio non erant, quod. ut reges sibi legebant, sublegebantque, quos in consilio publico haberent, ita post exactos eos consules quoque et tribuni militum consulari potestate coniunctissimos sibi quosque patriciorum, et deinde plebeiorum legebant...
Page 93 - Lex was next a collection of vegetables, from which the latter were called legumina. Later on, at a time when vulgar letters had not yet been invented for writing down the laws, lex by a necessity of civil nature must have meant a collection of citizens, or the public parliament; so that the presence of the people was the lex, or "law," that solemnized the wills 56 57 that were made calatis comitiis, in the presence of the assembled comitia.
Page 119 - The notion was that, though the physical person of the deceased had perished, his legal personality survived and descended unimpaired on his Heir or Co-heirs, in whom his identity (so far as the law was concerned) was continued.

About the author (2006)

C. J. Smith is Professor of Ancient History and Dean of Arts at the University of St. Andrews. His previous publications include Trading and Traders in the Ancient World (1998), Religion in Archaic and Republican Rome (2000) and Sicily from Aeneas to Augustus (2000). He is the editor of Fragmentary Roman Historians (forthcoming).

Bibliographic information