Page images
PDF
EPUB

deny. I wish I could, on the other hand, give a full notion of the idea which Mr. Locke had of that nobleman's merit. He lost no opportunity of speaking of it, and that in a manner which sufficiently showed he spoke from his heart. Though my Lord Shaftesbury had not spent much time in reading, nothing, in Mr. Locke's opinion, could be more just than the judgment he passed upon the books which fell into his hands. He presently saw through the design of a work; and without much heeding the words, which he ran over with vast rapidity, he immediately found whether the author was master of his subject, and whether his reasonings were exact. But, above all, Mr. Locke admired in him that penetration, that presence of mind, which always prompted him with the best expedients in the most desperate cases; that noble boldness which appeared in all his public discourses, a boldness ever guided by a solid judgment, which, never allowing him to say anything but what was proper, regulated his least word, and baffled the untiring vigilance of his enemies.".

5 Coste proceeds to ascribe to the patronage of Lord Shaftesbury that knowledge of the world and leisure for study which enabled Locke afterwards to enrich our literature and immortalize himself.

ADDENDA.

Mr. Malone, in his Life of Dryden, is very angry with Stringer for relating the anecdote inserted in p. 20, and with Martyn for copying from him. He has clearly proved that it is untrue. Erasmus-Henry, the poet's youngest son, and the only one educated at the Charter-house, was not admitted until February 5, 1682-3, a few days after Shaftesbury's death. He was ad mitted upon the nomination of Charles the Second. Malone only knew this work from the quotations from it in Kippis's article in the Biographia Britannica. The refutation is equally honourable to the Earl and the poet : to the Earl, as affording the highest proof of his judicial integrity, since it drew such admiration from an enemy; to the poet, as releasing him from that imputation of ingratitude which must have rested upon him had he written his poem of the Medal against a man from whom he had received so important an obligation.

The following paragraph was omitted in Vol. I. page 320, after line 13:

"The original article has since been published by Lord John Russell, in his Life of Lord William Russell, and the treaty at length by Dr. Lingard, in the Appendix to the seventh volume of his History of England: but although the sums stipulated to be paid by Louis were considerably less than those stated in the draft, the scope of the treaty was precisely the same."

« PreviousContinue »