Page images
PDF
EPUB

pendance of their crowns, against the ora- .

tion

Secondly, "The cardinal's fpeaking as one repre"fenting the clergy and nobility."

Thirdly," Because he himself had been represented "by him as a fower of diffention, and a perfecutor, "under whom the church is hardly able to fetch her "breath; yea, for one by whom the catholics of his kingdom are compelled to endure all forts of punish❝ments."

66

Laftly," By reason that France was reduced to fo miferable terms, that it was become a crime for a "Frenchman to ftand for his king, it was a neceffary "duetie of her neighbours to fpeak in her behalf (d)." (d) King

390.

1

These are the reafons alledged by James for en- James's works, p. gaging against Perron. After this he proceeds to his defence of the right of kings, and endeavours to fhew "that what the cardinal had advanced in fupport of his "doctrine, that it was abfurd and incongruous to con

demn, or wrappe under the folemn curfe, the abetters "of the pope's power to unking lawful and fovereign "kings: he endeavours to prove that what was faid "by the cardinal in behalf hereof, was meer nullity, "matter of imagination, and built upon falfe prefup"pofitions (e)." To enter into a minute detail of (e) Id. James's arguments would be tirefome to the reader. 396. Let it therefore fuffice to say, that he quotes fathers, councils and schoolmen; and that hiftory and scripture are alledged by him, and fometimes not impertinently.

It appears from this defence of the right of kings, that James had had a correspondence with Perron for years before; that he had fent him a difcourfe in writing, to which in three years the cardinal had not replied, which is attributed not to a want of capacity, but to "well advised agnition of his own working and

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

building upon a weak foundation (f)." If one knew (ƒ) Id. p. nothing more of James than what might be gathered 470. from this book, one fhould be tempted to imagine that he was a moft zealous proteftant. For he attributes all

[blocks in formation]

tion of the most illuftrious cardinal of Per

ron.

393.

[ocr errors]

the miseries of France and Great Britain to the Romish (g) Id. p. clergy (g), whom he paints out in no very agreeable colours; and at the fame time praifes the French p:oteftants in an extraordinary manner. He tells us he could never "learn that thofe of the religion in France, took arms against their king. In the firft civil wars, fays he, they food only upon their guard; they armed not, nor "took the field before they were purfued with fire and fword, burnt up and flaughtered. They were a re"fuge and fuccour to the princes of the blood; in re"gard of which worthy and honourable fervice, the "French king hath reafon to have the proteftants in "his gracious remembrance. He then fets forth their

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

great merit with refpect to the third and fourth Henry, "to whom they flood in all their battles, to bear up

the crown then tottering and ready to fall (b).” This is a very remarkable teftimony to the fidelity and loyalty of the Hugonots, as it comes from one who hated their principle of parity in the church, looked on fuch as held it as very pets in church and commonwealth, and who spoke more bitterly of them than of the papifts (i). For the French proteftants differed nothing at all from the English and Scotch puritans, either in difcipline or doctrine. This remonftrance against Perron, was written firft in French by his majefty, afterwards by his leave tranflated into English, as alfo into Latin, anno 1616, in 4to. for I remember to have feen fuch an edition of it in that language.Perron though he had neglected James's private writing returned an answer to this public remonftrance, for in the account of the faid cardinal's writings in Perrault's characters (4), and in Collier's dictionary (1), I find a work intitled, a reply to the king of Great Britain's an"fwer." Whether this is the whole of the title I'know not, any more than I do what the answer contained, for both thefe authors are by much too fuperficial in their accounts of the moft eminent writers, and their per

[ocr errors]

formances.

ron.

This was his laft controverfial work. But befides the pieces already mentioned, he published alfo a counterblafte to tobacco (FFF), began a tranflation of the pfalms of king

formances (m).As this remonftrance is the laft pole- (m) Vid. mical work of James which we have to mention, Lord appendix. Shaftsbury's defcription of him as a prince-writer, will not improperly conclude this note. As to which, from what has been feen by the reader already, he may in a good measure be able to judge of its truth and propriety. "A prince of a pacific nature and fluent thought, fub"mitting arms and martial difcipline to the gown; and "confiding in his princely fcience and profound learn"ing, made his ftyle and speech the nerve and finew "of his government. He gave us his works full of "wife exhortation and advice to his royal fon, as well "as of inftruction to his good people; who could not "without admiration obferve their author-fovereign, "thus ftudious and contemplative in their behalf. 'Twas "then one might have feen our nation growing young "and docile, with that fimplicity of heart which qua❝lified them to profit like a scholar-people under their

royal preceptor. For with abundant eloquence he "graciously gave leffons to his parliament, tutored his "minifters, and edified the greatest churchmen and "divines themfelves; by whofe fuffrage he obtained the

higheft appellations which could be merited by the acuteft wit, and trueft understanding. From hence "the British nations were taught to own in common a "Solomon for their joint fovereign, the founder of their ❝late compleated union (n)." Whether this defcrip- () Charac tion of our author-fovereign, as his lordfhip ftyles him, terifticks, be too foft or fevere, I leave entirely to the judgment of Vol. I. p. the reader: nothing doubting but he will be pleafed to 12m0.1746. fee it, whatever he may think of it.

(FFF) He publifhed a counterblaste to tobacco] This

K 4

was

192. edit.

(a) King James's works, P.

221.

Fœdera,

king David; and writ a few fonnets and epitaphs.

was first printed in quarto, without name or date. It is a wretched performance both for matter and manner. In it he fets forth how difhonourable 'tis in us to imitate the beaftly Indians in fo vile and stinking a custom as ufing tobacco; how unreasonable the pleas alledged in defence of it are; and the mifchievous confequences flowing from the ufe, or filthy abufe of it. Here he tells us that by ufing tobacco men are guilty of finful and fhameful luft; that 'tis a branch of the fin of drunkenness; that it enervates the body, and ruins the eftate; for, adds he, "fome gentlemen beftow three, "fome four hundred pounds a year upon this precious "ftink (a)." If this is true 'tis very amazing. Tho' 'tis certain James laid a moft heavy duty on it, in order to hinder its confumption." For there is extant his warrant to the lord, treasurer Dorset, anno 1604. "for laying a good heavy impofition on tobacco, that

[ocr errors]

lefs quantity may be brought into the realm, and "only fufficient for the better fort, who will use it "with moderation for their health; wherefore he au"thorises the said treasurer to order, that from the 26th "of October enfuing, the proper officers fhould take

of all who import tobacco, the fum of fix fhillings "and eight pence upon every pound weight, over and above the cuftom of two pence per pound usually (3) Rymer's paid heretofore (b)." Excellent policy this! to dif Tom. XVI. Courage the taking of that which has fince proved one fol. 601. of the greatest revenues of the crown, and has proapud Oldys's duced vaft benefit to Britain, and her plantations. For life of Ra- two of our colonies are fupported by it; great numbers Note d. Fol. of fhips and feamen are employed in bringing it over; Lond. 1733. and the cuftom duties of it are counted, on a medium, gia, p. 518. to amount to 169,0791. os. 10d. per annum. But 'tis Fol. Lend. no wonder " that such a philosopher, as could magnify "the power of witches, after the manner he has done "in one of his learned pamphlets, fhould be fuch a politician as to difcourage the taking of tobacco in an

leigh, p. 32.

and acta re

3734.

"other,

taphs (GGG). So fond was he of fhewing his parts, inftructing and entertaining his

good

"other, fays Mr. Oldys (c)." But those who have (c) Oldys "not admired, continues the fame gentleman, at his P. 32. "prejudice in this attempt to difpel the fumes of that

[ocr errors]

herb with greater of his own, if I may allude to the "witty title of his performance without imputation of irreverence to his memory, may yet applaud his policy, in fo far conducing to its fuppreffion, as to ex"clude it from the body of his works, when this royal "pamphleteer refolved to become an author in folio.' If I understand this paragraph aright, it is afferted in it that the counterblaft to tobacco, makes no part of James's folio volume. But this is a miftake, and could proceed from nothing but trufting, I fuppofe, too much to memory, in a thing of fmall importance. A fault, that even the most exact authors are liable to fall into.

theca angle

(GGG) He began a tranflation of the pfalms of king David, &c.] In lord Anglefey's catalogue, I find king James's tranflation of the pfalms to be fung after the old tunes, 1651 (a); and I am affured by a learned (a) Bibliofriend, from one who has feen it, that fuch a transla- fiana, article tion was published in his name, though I have not yet (divinity, in been fo fortunate as to meet with it. But this tranfla- fmall 8vo. tion was only begun by James, as we may learn from p. 19.) the following quotation. This tranflation he was in Lond. 1686. "hand with, fays bifhop Williams, (when God called 4to. "him to fing pfalms with the angels.)-he intended

ઃઃ

to have finished and dedicated it to the only faint of his devotion, the church of Great Britain, and that "of Ireland. This work was ftaied in the one and thirty pfalm." We have two fonnets of his

[ocr errors]

in

Great Britain's Salomon. A fermon preached at the magnificent funeral of the most high and mighty king James. By John lord bishop of Lincolne, lord keeper of the great feale of England. London, printed for John Bill, printer to the king's most excellent majesty. 1625. p. $2. 450.

12mo. &c.

« PreviousContinue »