Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Ohio, Volume 45Robert Clark, 1888 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 82
Page 39
... ERROR to the District Court of Hamilton County . Eugene E. Brown , the defendant in error , brought suit in the superior court of Cincinnati , against the Citizens ' National Bank of Cincinnati , the plaintiff in error , alleging in sub ...
... ERROR to the District Court of Hamilton County . Eugene E. Brown , the defendant in error , brought suit in the superior court of Cincinnati , against the Citizens ' National Bank of Cincinnati , the plaintiff in error , alleging in sub ...
Page 41
... error . T. Q. Hildebrand , for defendant in error . DICKMAN , J. The record discloses as facts established to the satisfaction of the courts below , and which we are not disposed to call in question , that the defendant in error , on ...
... error . T. Q. Hildebrand , for defendant in error . DICKMAN , J. The record discloses as facts established to the satisfaction of the courts below , and which we are not disposed to call in question , that the defendant in error , on ...
Page 49
... error that the court below allowed interest on the certificate of deposit from the 18th day of September , 1882. On that day Brown requested payment , and the bank refused . It was incumbent upon him to produce and sur- render the ...
... error that the court below allowed interest on the certificate of deposit from the 18th day of September , 1882. On that day Brown requested payment , and the bank refused . It was incumbent upon him to produce and sur- render the ...
Page 63
... ERROR to the District Court of Hamilton County . The plaintiff in error , Marmet , was convicted and fined in the police court of the city of Cincinnati , upon a charge founded on provisions of the act of April 16 , 1883 ( 80 Ohio L ...
... ERROR to the District Court of Hamilton County . The plaintiff in error , Marmet , was convicted and fined in the police court of the city of Cincinnati , upon a charge founded on provisions of the act of April 16 , 1883 ( 80 Ohio L ...
Page 64
... error brought suit to collect money claimed to have been illegally exacted by the officers of the city in compelling ... error . Coppock , Cox & Gallagher , city solicitors , and Wulsin & Perkins , for defendants in error . SPEAR , J ...
... error brought suit to collect money claimed to have been illegally exacted by the officers of the city in compelling ... error . Coppock , Cox & Gallagher , city solicitors , and Wulsin & Perkins , for defendants in error . SPEAR , J ...
Contents
388 | |
401 | |
407 | |
426 | |
439 | |
444 | |
445 | |
464 | |
169 | |
183 | |
196 | |
214 | |
239 | |
249 | |
264 | |
304 | |
333 | |
343 | |
347 | |
368 | |
377 | |
495 | |
499 | |
525 | |
535 | |
555 | |
577 | |
592 | |
625 | |
632 | |
653 | |
664 | |
678 | |
702 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
15 Ohio action agreement alleged assessment assignment authority bill bonds Burlington Railroad certificate certificate of deposit charge Cincinnati circuit court claim common pleas consolidation constitution construction contract court of common court of equity creditors crossing debt deceased deed defendant in error defendant's Delphos dower duty election entitled equity evidence ex rel executed fact filed Grand Rapids Railroad Guarnieri Hamilton county held husband indictment indorser injury interest judge judgment jury land liable lien Mahoning County ment mortgage Nancy Wallace National Bank negligence notice Ohio St owner paid parties payment person petition plaintiff in error possession probate court proceedings promissory note purchase question Railway Company real estate reason recover rendered Revised Statutes road rule sewer statute of frauds street supra surety thereof tion Toledo & Grand track trust Wabash Wabash Railway wife