Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Ohio, Volume 44Robert Clark, 1887 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 42
Page 1887
... senate , and after- ward a judge of this court . In 1852 he was admitted to the bar , and began the practice of the law at Ironton , Lawrence county , Ohio , and at once took a commanding position among the able lawyers then practicing ...
... senate , and after- ward a judge of this court . In 1852 he was admitted to the bar , and began the practice of the law at Ironton , Lawrence county , Ohio , and at once took a commanding position among the able lawyers then practicing ...
Page 111
... senate was not judicial power within the meaning of section 1 , article 4 . The following is a part of the language used by Judge White in delivering the opinion of the court : " That the senate is not a court established under the ...
... senate was not judicial power within the meaning of section 1 , article 4 . The following is a part of the language used by Judge White in delivering the opinion of the court : " That the senate is not a court established under the ...
Page 128
... senate , sitting for the purpose , as a judicial body . Similar proceedings ( for the removal of offi- cers ) in the county or other courts are held to be judicial . And we do not doubt that every proceeding for the re- The State ex rel ...
... senate , sitting for the purpose , as a judicial body . Similar proceedings ( for the removal of offi- cers ) in the county or other courts are held to be judicial . And we do not doubt that every proceeding for the re- The State ex rel ...
Page 129
... senate sitting as a court of impeachment , and that that tribunal alone can remove an officer for misconduct . This case was followed with approval in State v . Prit- chard , 36 N. J. Law , 101 , in which , although the police ...
... senate sitting as a court of impeachment , and that that tribunal alone can remove an officer for misconduct . This case was followed with approval in State v . Prit- chard , 36 N. J. Law , 101 , in which , although the police ...
Page 132
... question involved the constitutionality of the act conferring on the senate authority to try the contested election of a common pleas judge . White , J. , says : " The The State ex rel . Attorney - General v . 132 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO .
... question involved the constitutionality of the act conferring on the senate authority to try the contested election of a common pleas judge . White , J. , says : " The The State ex rel . Attorney - General v . 132 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO .
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
alimony alleged Allen County amount answer apply appointed Arcade Hotel assembly assessment Attorney-General authority averment bill bond Brewster canal cause of action charge Cincinnati claim Clark commissioners common pleas constitution contract corporation counsel court of common creditors Cuyahoga county deceased deed defendant in error demurrer district court divorce dower duty election evidence ex rel facts filed Gelhaus Hamilton county held Herron husband indorser intoxicating liquors journal judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury lands lease legislative legislature liability lien Lucas county mayor ment mortgage notice Ohio St Olive McGill owner paid party payment person petition plaintiff in error pleaded premises premium probate court proceeding question quo warranto Railroad Company Railway Company reason Revised Statutes rule Sarah Clark senate Smith supra sureties term thereof Thompson tion traffic trial Wiatt wife