What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights DecisionJack M. Balkin Legal experts rewrite the landmark court decision |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 37
... remedy) 135 • Catharine A. MacKinnon (concurring in the judgment) 143 • Michael W. McConnell (concurring in the judgment) 158 • Cass R. Sunstein (concurring in the judgment) 174 • Derrick A. Bell (dissenting) 185 • Comments from the ...
... remedy segregation, and it held that states should desegregate their schools “with all deliberate speed.” I asked the participants to draft an opinion that addressed the legal issues raised by all three of these opinions: Brown I (the ...
... remedy for segregated schools for another year. It issued a second opinion in Brown v. Board of Education on May 31, 1955,3 to deal with remedial issues, concluding with the order to go forward “with all deliberate speed.” This opinion ...
... remedy for previous injustices (Brown II). Brown I is venerated for declaring segregation unconstitutional, but the desegregation remedies begun in Brown II have been honored in the breach more than the observance. The shift in ...
... remedy the effects of past discrimination and help minorities gain greater opportunities in education and employment, they are acting consistent with the spirit of Brown, because the real goal of Brown was genuine educational ...
Other editions - View all
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal ... Jack Balkin No preview available - 2002 |