The South Western Reporter, Volume 222West Publishing Company, 1920 - Law reports, digests, etc Includes the decisions of the Supreme Courts of Missouri, Arkansas, Tennessee, and Texas, and Court of Appeals of Kentucky; Aug./Dec. 1886-May/Aug. 1892, Court of Appeals of Texas; Aug. 1892/Feb. 1893-Jan./Feb. 1928, Courts of Civil and Criminal Appeals of Texas; Apr./June 1896-Aug./Nov. 1907, Court of Appeals of Indian Territory; May/June 1927-Jan./Feb. 1928, Courts of Appeals of Missouri and Commission of Appeals of Texas. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 1
Be it further enacted , that it shall fendant in error with unlawfully receiving be unlawful for any person , firm or corporation intoxicating liquors , and the second with un- to possess intoxicating liquors , including wine , lawfully ...
Be it further enacted , that it shall fendant in error with unlawfully receiving be unlawful for any person , firm or corporation intoxicating liquors , and the second with un- to possess intoxicating liquors , including wine , lawfully ...
Page 46
In had taken possession , the third person's con- Marshall v . Whatley , 136 Ga . 805 , 72 S. E. 244 , tract was unenforceable , and he was therefore 36 L. R. A. ( N. S. ) 552 , it was held that a suit affected by the buyer's lis ...
In had taken possession , the third person's con- Marshall v . Whatley , 136 Ga . 805 , 72 S. E. 244 , tract was unenforceable , and he was therefore 36 L. R. A. ( N. S. ) 552 , it was held that a suit affected by the buyer's lis ...
Page 49
that he was the true proprietor , and in ignorance that any other person claimed a better 1. Insane persons Em71 - Chancery court held right to the land . to have jurisdiction to cancel curator's deed . 8.
that he was the true proprietor , and in ignorance that any other person claimed a better 1. Insane persons Em71 - Chancery court held right to the land . to have jurisdiction to cancel curator's deed . 8.
Page 50
A deed was ordered , An insane person , not under guardianship , executed , approved , and delivered to the pur - can sue and be sued the same as a sane perchaser , J. W. Patton , who took possession of son . Peters v .
A deed was ordered , An insane person , not under guardianship , executed , approved , and delivered to the pur - can sue and be sued the same as a sane perchaser , J. W. Patton , who took possession of son . Peters v .
Page 72
Q. If a person states in his apa case of that sort , assuming that the applicant plication for insurance that he has been sufstated that in his application for insurance ? A. fering from indigestion , or a disease of the He would have ...
Q. If a person states in his apa case of that sort , assuming that the applicant plication for insurance that he has been sufstated that in his application for insurance ? A. fering from indigestion , or a disease of the He would have ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acres action adverse possession affirmed agreed agreement alleged amount answer appellant appellee application asked assignment authority bank bill cause charge circuit court Civil Appeals claim condition contract Court of Civil damages death deceased deed defendant directed district duty effect error evidence executed facts favor fence filed fire follows further give given ground held hold injury instruction interest issue Judge judgment jury land lien lived matter ment necessary negligence objection opinion owner paid parties payment person petition plaintiff pleaded possession present purchase question railroad reason received record reference rendered reversed rule Scott secure statement statute sufficient suit testified testimony Texas tion track tract trial court trust verdict wife witness
Popular passages
Page 217 - This entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement indorsed hereon or added hereto, shall be void if the insured now has or shall hereafter make or procure any other contract of insurance, whether valid or not, on property covered in whole or in part by this policy...
Page 7 - The true rule is, that what is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily a question for the jury. It is not a question of science or of legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending it.
Page 417 - Columbia and any of the states or territories and any foreign nation or nations shall be liable in damages to any person suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or in case of the death of such employee to his or her personal representative...
Page 187 - That every common carrier by railroad while engaging in commerce between any of the several States or Territories, or between any of the States and Territories, or between the District of Columbia and any of the States or Territories and any foreign nation or nations, shall be liable in damages to any person suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce...
Page 277 - ... 1. If the injured employee shall have worked in the employment in which he was working at the time of the accident, whether for the same employer or not, during substantially the whole of the year immediately preceding his injury...
Page 187 - ... for such injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents, or employees of such carrier, or by reason of any defect or insufficiency, due to its negligence, in its cars, engines, appliances, machinery, track, roadbed, works, boats, wharves, or other equipment.
Page 7 - In determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence; such a consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act.
Page 228 - ... the court on motion of either party, or upon its own motion, may enter the final judgment...
Page 160 - Any interested party who is not willing and does not consent to abide by the final ruling and decision...
Page 59 - Until the general assembly shall deem it expedient to establish courts of chancery the circuit courts shall have jurisdiction in matters of equity, subject to appeal to the supreme court, in such manner as may be prescribed by law.
Bibliographic information
| Title | The South Western Reporter, Volume 222 |
| Contributors | Missouri. Supreme Court, West Publishing Company, Arkansas. Supreme Court, Tennessee. Supreme Court, Texas. Supreme Court, Kentucky. Court of Appeals, Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals, United States. Court of Appeals (Indian Territory), Missouri. Courts of Appeals, Texas. Commissioners of Appeals |
| Publisher | West Publishing Company, 1920 |
| Original from | the University of California |
| Digitized | 3 Aug 2007 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |