Page images
PDF
EPUB

PAGE

BATCHELOR v. KEITH (Secondary evidence of unstamped agreement
to a lease-When it may be given)

56

...

...

BLOYD V. HUNT (Landlord and tenant-Annual rental value above 201.—
Actual length of tenancy in question-Jurisdiction of County Court)
COLE v. WOOD (Action on lost bill of exchange)...
SALTER V. BROOKS (Receipt by bailiff to purchaser of goods taken in
execution need not be registered as a bill of sale)

[ocr errors]

BAKER v. MEIKLE (Receipt of cheque operating as accord and satis-
faction)

[ocr errors][merged small]
[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]
[ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]
[ocr errors][ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

ROYAL 8vo., PRICE 10s., FREE BY POST, 10s. 6D.

REPORTS of CASES in the COUNTY COURTS
included in Circuits Nos. 45 and 46. Heard and
determined by Henry James Stonor, Esq., Judge of the
said Courts. Edited by HENRY ANSELM DE COLYAR,
Esq., Barrister-at-Law.

This book amply vindicates the claim that ability, learning, and
industry are brought to bear in the County Courts upon the business
before the judges. The nature of the cases shows the character of the juris-
diction exercised, the difficulty of the points frequently raised, and the
labour and intelligence devoted to their decision. The work of editing has
been well done. It is a valuable record of what a County Court judge can
do, and, as such, is likely to be a useful instrument in any controversy
which may be impending."-Law Journal.

"It is difficult to say whether this valuable and practical work reflects

most credit upon Mr. Stonor or Mr. de Colyar. We commend the volume

to the notice of all those who are interested either in the history of the

County Courts or in the County Court practice of the present day."--Law

Times.

"This work shows the quantity and quality of the tasks accomplished by

the tribunals which have to do with more persons and more property than

all the other courts put together, and of which legislators and the public

are most imperfectly informed. We could select many cases from Mr. de

Colyar's book of interest and importance, but enough has been said to show

that his work deserves to be widely known and studied.”—Morning Post.

"Each division furnishes its list of disputes settled by the County Courts,

the great railway companies alone affording much litigious work concerning

the charge of luggage and goods consigned to their custody, he over-

crowding of carriages, and the unpunctuality of trains."- Daily Telegraph.

"Contracts, torts, railway cases, bankruptcy, and miscellaneous mark the

five parts into which this work is sub-divided. Throughout the book Mr.

de Colyar's notes are admirably to the purpose; and, thanks to the care

with which he has put its contents together, a really important addition has

been made to every well appointed law library."-Weekly Register.

"As a book of reference as well as a vade mecum the publication is a

most desirable acquisition. . . . The known painstaking character of the

decisions of the learned judge, and his long experience and sound logical

reasoning, will, we hope, insure a large and useful circulation for this

publication, in which the able author so well embodies Judge Stonor's

valuable judgments."-Surrey Advertiser.

· We have read Mr. Stonor's decisions with interest and profit. They are

full of sound law and good sense, and in one point, moreover, extremely

valuable. Of late years the interpretation of certain statutes has been

almost exclusively intrusted to the County Courts, and the tendency is to

carry that practice even farther. Upon such enactments as The Married

Women's Property Act and The Employers' Liability Act we must go to the

County Courts almost exclusively for information."-Western Daily Mercury.

b

...

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

...

Re LANDON (an Infant); Ex parte HODGSON (Liability of infants to
be made bankrupts under Bankruptey Act, 1869)

Re W. AND T. MILES; Ex parte MILES (Registrar has no power

before first meeting of creditors to estimate an unascertained debt

under Bankruptcy Act, 1869, s. 31)

[ocr errors]

Re THREADKELL; Ex parte SHRUBSOLE (Absolute garnishee order a
'charge" on debt attached within sects 12 and 16 of the Bank-

ruptcy Act, 1869

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

Re SWAIN; Ex parte EGGINGTON (What amounts to transfer of
growing timber sold to bankrupt-Lien for purchase money)

Re MILLS; Ex parte GILBERT (Debt due to friendly society from its

officer has no priority in bankruptcy)..

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Re COOKE; Ex parte HILDER (Bankruptcy Act, 1869, s. 92-Fraudu-
lent preference)

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

...

...

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

WORTHINGTON v. JOHNSON (Costs out of deposit made by plaintiff on
appeal refused to defendant-Solicitor has no lien on such deposit) 283

« PreviousContinue »