Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Ohio, Volumes 17-18Robert Clark, 1887 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 71
Page 38
... prove that the deed was signed by the plaintiff and her husband , David L. Carney . The deed was admitted in evidence , subject to the exceptions of the plaintiff . The further proceedings on the trial , as shown by the bill of ex ...
... prove that the deed was signed by the plaintiff and her husband , David L. Carney . The deed was admitted in evidence , subject to the exceptions of the plaintiff . The further proceedings on the trial , as shown by the bill of ex ...
Page 43
... prove . Let it be assumed that the plaintiff signed and sealed the deed ; still there was no proof that she acknowledged such signing and sealing , except the statement of a person having no legal authority to make such statement or ...
... prove . Let it be assumed that the plaintiff signed and sealed the deed ; still there was no proof that she acknowledged such signing and sealing , except the statement of a person having no legal authority to make such statement or ...
Page 69
... prove the necessary averment , that he was kept out of the possession of such property by the other party . It is manifest that this was not the " appropriate action " for the plaint- iff , as he did not seek the recovery of real ...
... prove the necessary averment , that he was kept out of the possession of such property by the other party . It is manifest that this was not the " appropriate action " for the plaint- iff , as he did not seek the recovery of real ...
Page 72
... prove the existence of the paper , its possession by his adversary , or that it is under his control , before the latter is called on to speak , and the introduction of evidence calls upon the judge hearing it to decide upon its ...
... prove the existence of the paper , its possession by his adversary , or that it is under his control , before the latter is called on to speak , and the introduction of evidence calls upon the judge hearing it to decide upon its ...
Page 102
... prove that it was not necessary to preserve the life of the mother . ERROR to the court of common pleas of Morgan county .蘩 J. L. Berry , for plaintiff in error , cited 1 Chit . Crim . Law , 283 , 557 ; 1 Greenl . Ev . , sec . 74 ...
... prove that it was not necessary to preserve the life of the mother . ERROR to the court of common pleas of Morgan county .蘩 J. L. Berry , for plaintiff in error , cited 1 Chit . Crim . Law , 283 , 557 ; 1 Greenl . Ev . , sec . 74 ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
11 Ohio St Adm'r alleged amount answer assigned authority avers bill bond BRINKERHOFF canal company cause of action charge Cincinnati claim commissioners common pleas consideration constitution construction contract conveyance conveyed corporation court of common court of equity creditors debts decree deed defendant in error demurrer devised district court dollars entitled equity evidence ex rel executed fact fee simple filed fraud fund Hamilton county heirs held indictment intention intestate issue James Pollock John judgment jury land legacies liability lien March 29 ment mortgage Ohio St paid parties payment person petition in error plaintiff in error possession premises proceedings purchase purpose question quo warranto railroad company real estate record rendered rule Stat statute stockholders term testator thereof tion township trial trust verdict void vote Whitewater Canal wife Wood county Zanesville