Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Ohio, Volumes 17-18Robert Clark, 1887 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 74
Page 17
... parties . They all bought before the mortgage was left for record , and without notice of plaintiffs ' rights . Their contracts were merely executory , giving them no present legal interest or right of possession . They obtained no ...
... parties . They all bought before the mortgage was left for record , and without notice of plaintiffs ' rights . Their contracts were merely executory , giving them no present legal interest or right of possession . They obtained no ...
Page 19
... parties holding equal equi- ties , the court will not interfere to change or affect the legal title , or the rights of the parties at law - simply because nothing is gained to equity thereby , the one having as good right in equity as ...
... parties holding equal equi- ties , the court will not interfere to change or affect the legal title , or the rights of the parties at law - simply because nothing is gained to equity thereby , the one having as good right in equity as ...
Page 38
... parties . The defendant , who acquired the title and possession of Barr in 1827 , asks to be relieved against the errors and omission in the in- denture , and that the plaintiff might be enjoined from prosecuting her claim for dower ...
... parties . The defendant , who acquired the title and possession of Barr in 1827 , asks to be relieved against the errors and omission in the in- denture , and that the plaintiff might be enjoined from prosecuting her claim for dower ...
Page 40
... parties . If relief can be granted in one case , why not in the other ? Again , all deeds must be attested by two ... parties have omitted to observe them , if the courts are satisfied that the parties intended to do the same thing as ...
... parties . If relief can be granted in one case , why not in the other ? Again , all deeds must be attested by two ... parties have omitted to observe them , if the courts are satisfied that the parties intended to do the same thing as ...
Page 90
... parties will , in general , control the inter- pretation of deeds . McAferty v . Conover , 7 Ohio St. 104 . 2. The parties intended Price should be bounded by the line and courses of Moncure's tract . This intention is entirely ...
... parties will , in general , control the inter- pretation of deeds . McAferty v . Conover , 7 Ohio St. 104 . 2. The parties intended Price should be bounded by the line and courses of Moncure's tract . This intention is entirely ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
11 Ohio St Adm'r alleged amount answer assigned authority avers bill bond BRINKERHOFF canal company cause of action charge Cincinnati claim commissioners common pleas consideration constitution construction contract conveyance conveyed corporation court of common court of equity creditors debts decree deed defendant in error demurrer devised district court dollars entitled equity evidence ex rel executed fact fee simple filed fraud fund Hamilton county heirs held indictment intention intestate issue James Pollock John judgment jury land legacies liability lien March 29 ment mortgage Ohio St paid parties payment person petition in error plaintiff in error possession premises proceedings purchase purpose question quo warranto railroad company real estate record rendered rule Stat statute stockholders term testator thereof tion township trial trust verdict void vote Whitewater Canal wife Wood county Zanesville