Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Ohio, Volumes 17-18Robert Clark, 1887 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 72
Page 28
... common pleas . The undertaking recites that : " Whereas , on the 22d day of April , 1863 , " the plaintiff recovered a judgment , etc. In the common pleas the plaintiff moved to dismiss the appeal , on the ground that the undertaking ...
... common pleas . The undertaking recites that : " Whereas , on the 22d day of April , 1863 , " the plaintiff recovered a judgment , etc. In the common pleas the plaintiff moved to dismiss the appeal , on the ground that the undertaking ...
Page 67
... common pleas , from which the defendant appealed to the district court . That court dismissed the appeal , and the defendant brought his petition in error in this court , which reversed the judgment of the district court , dismissing ...
... common pleas , from which the defendant appealed to the district court . That court dismissed the appeal , and the defendant brought his petition in error in this court , which reversed the judgment of the district court , dismissing ...
Page 74
... common pleas for a second trial . The plaintiff below again served notice on the defendants below , to produce on the trial of the cause the written contract , and in Oc- tober , 1863 , made a motion in the court of common pleas to com ...
... common pleas for a second trial . The plaintiff below again served notice on the defendants below , to produce on the trial of the cause the written contract , and in Oc- tober , 1863 , made a motion in the court of common pleas to com ...
Page 80
... common pleas of Knox county . Reserved in the district court . The original action was commenced in the court of common 87 ] pleas of Knox county , by John McCormack , one of the * de- fendants in error , against Charles Cooper and a ...
... common pleas of Knox county . Reserved in the district court . The original action was commenced in the court of common 87 ] pleas of Knox county , by John McCormack , one of the * de- fendants in error , against Charles Cooper and a ...
Page 86
... common pleas of Hocking county had , before the filing of the original petition in this case , acquired jurisdiction over the statutory individual liability of the plaintiffs in error , as stockholders in The Five - Mile Furnace Company ...
... common pleas of Hocking county had , before the filing of the original petition in this case , acquired jurisdiction over the statutory individual liability of the plaintiffs in error , as stockholders in The Five - Mile Furnace Company ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
11 Ohio St Adm'r alleged amount answer assigned authority avers bill bond BRINKERHOFF canal company cause of action charge Cincinnati claim commissioners common pleas consideration constitution construction contract conveyance conveyed corporation court of common court of equity creditors debts decree deed defendant in error demurrer devised district court dollars entitled equity evidence ex rel executed fact fee simple filed fraud fund Hamilton county heirs held indictment intention intestate issue James Pollock John judgment jury land legacies liability lien March 29 ment mortgage Ohio St paid parties payment person petition in error plaintiff in error possession premises proceedings purchase purpose question quo warranto railroad company real estate record rendered rule Stat statute stockholders term testator thereof tion township trial trust verdict void vote Whitewater Canal wife Wood county Zanesville