Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Ohio, Volumes 17-18Robert Clark, 1887 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 72
Page 48
... applied , so long and so far as the same should continue in the ownership and control of the body corporate ; and was not intended to limit or qualify the general power of mortgaging , con- ferred by the act . ERROR to the Superior ...
... applied , so long and so far as the same should continue in the ownership and control of the body corporate ; and was not intended to limit or qualify the general power of mortgaging , con- ferred by the act . ERROR to the Superior ...
Page 58
... applied to the payment of the debt created in erecting the buildings ; and section 4 repeals all acts and parts of acts conflicting with this act . 49 Ohio L. 295 . It is clear that the board of trustees , by whose authority these bonds ...
... applied to the payment of the debt created in erecting the buildings ; and section 4 repeals all acts and parts of acts conflicting with this act . 49 Ohio L. 295 . It is clear that the board of trustees , by whose authority these bonds ...
Page 62
... applied , so long and so far as the same should remain in the ownership or subject to the con- trol of the body corporate . It is a limitation on the corporate powers , in favor of what the first section denominates " regular scientific ...
... applied , so long and so far as the same should remain in the ownership or subject to the con- trol of the body corporate . It is a limitation on the corporate powers , in favor of what the first section denominates " regular scientific ...
Page 70
... applied to this case , is in harmony with the more ancient rules of equity jurisprudence . Nor would relief be refused ( where the recovery of possession is not asked ) under either the present or former systems of practice , because ...
... applied to this case , is in harmony with the more ancient rules of equity jurisprudence . Nor would relief be refused ( where the recovery of possession is not asked ) under either the present or former systems of practice , because ...
Page 73
... applied as a payment on said note on February 22 , 1854 . To this answer the plaintiff , Goodwin , replied : 1. That said defense is barred by the statute of limitations . 2. That before the execution of the deed from Goodwin to the ...
... applied as a payment on said note on February 22 , 1854 . To this answer the plaintiff , Goodwin , replied : 1. That said defense is barred by the statute of limitations . 2. That before the execution of the deed from Goodwin to the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
11 Ohio St Adm'r alleged amount answer assigned authority avers bill bond BRINKERHOFF canal company cause of action charge Cincinnati claim commissioners common pleas consideration constitution construction contract conveyance conveyed corporation court of common court of equity creditors debts decree deed defendant in error demurrer devised district court dollars entitled equity evidence ex rel executed fact fee simple filed fraud fund Hamilton county heirs held indictment intention intestate issue James Pollock John judgment jury land legacies liability lien March 29 ment mortgage Ohio St paid parties payment person petition in error plaintiff in error possession premises proceedings purchase purpose question quo warranto railroad company real estate record rendered rule Stat statute stockholders term testator thereof tion township trial trust verdict void vote Whitewater Canal wife Wood county Zanesville